Intel shows how a 10nm processor goes "from sand to silicon"

onetheycallEric

Posts: 192   +26
Staff member

The subtle art of giving a pile of sand a brain is, well... complicated. As you'll see in the video, a chip travels "hundreds of miles" along Intel's automated lines as it goes from one tool to another. A processor (or wafer, rather) goes through more than 1,000 steps building up and forming transistors before it even heads off to die packaging.

Recommended read: How CPUs are Designed and Built

Intel briefly goes over some of the technology that underpins its FinFET process, such as "Gate-Last" and High-K Metal Gate formation. There's also a section that mentions Intel's COAG (contact over active gate) technology, which has been rumored to have been a contributing factor in Intel's troubles with 10nm yields.

The video then moves to the portion where dozens of interconnected wires are added to complete the circuit. To greatly over-simply things, resistance increases as transistors decrease in size, and scaling the wires to the transistors introduces other problems, like issues with electromigration. To combat this, Intel moved away from copper wiring to cobalt for interconnects.

Again, this is another move that has been rumored to have been problematic for Intel's 10nm process.

Intel recently outlined how it believes it will be behind its competitors (primarily TSMC) in terms of process leadership for some time to come. It will take Intel until the end of 2021, when it rolls out its 7nm process -- barring any problems -- to reach process parity with TSMC. Intel doesn't expect to gain process leadership again until 5nm, which as far as anyone can tell, will be 2023 at the earliest.

Permalink to story.

 

Irata

Posts: 636   +836
TechSpot Elite
Thanks for sharing those rumours. I admit I didn't look into the specifics before today, but I will now.

I'm not worried. Intel will be back. They've been here before. And if AMD can do it, so can Intel. 5nm vs 7nm will be a good fight.
Intel has all the resources but handling failure / being kicked down is much harder to handle if all you know is being on top and in control.
 

havok585

Posts: 226   +67
Video does not play :

An error occurred. Please try again later. (Playback ID: rOXB1uiuczkM-0Ya)
Learn More

...
 

captaincranky

Posts: 16,065   +4,867
All this sounds like Intel making excuses. If TSMC can put out a 7 nm product, why doesn't the biggest CPU manufacture in the world, at least have a 10 nm product on store shelves?

I'm not a fanboy of either Intel or AMD. Just an interested party who thinks that Intel's "road map" timetable, was just a bunch of know nothing corporate blowhards, yammering a bunch of "Moore's Law" doggerel at stockholders.

(I'm still waiting for the whole "Moore's Law" nonsense, to be appropriately renamed to, "Moore's Best Guess")