Messaging app Signal will block Windows Recall from taking chat screenshots

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 1,750   +524
Staff
WTF?! Recall is shaping up to be a security and privacy nightmare – and one of the most popular messaging platforms is already trying to patch the hole. Signal's developers are now resorting to a "weird trick" involving Windows DRM to shield users from unwanted Microsoft surveillance.

The desktop version of Signal now includes a new "Screen security" feature designed to block external programs – and even Windows 11 – from capturing screenshots of the app window. Enabled by default, the setting is Signal's direct response to Microsoft's push to turn Windows into a powerful surveillance tool through Copilot's Recall feature.

Signal's official blog states that the Screen Security option protects message privacy from Microsoft Recall. Redmond recently relaunched its AI-fed, perpetual screenshot feature for Copilot+ PCs – claiming to have added new controls to address concerns about privacy violations and unwanted data collection.

None of this matters to Signal. Microsoft built Recall to capture desktop and app window screenshots every few seconds, store them in a local database, and shamelessly feed that data to an onboard large language model.

"It's a one-year anniversary that nobody wants to celebrate, but Recall is back and Signal is ready," the company said.

Microsoft's adjustments to Recall fall short, as the feature still risks exposing content from "privacy-preserving" apps like Signal. The desktop app now has an extra layer of protection to maintain its security, even if it means accepting some usability trade-offs.

Windows 11 currently offers no official APIs to prevent Recall from capturing screenshots of an app. As a result, Signal's developers had to get creative, leveraging Windows' native DRM technology to make the app's window impossible to capture.

"Apps like Signal shouldn't have to use 'one weird trick' just to protect their users' privacy and maintain service integrity without proper developer tools," the frustrated developers said.

Millions worldwide rely on Signal to keep their communication safe and encrypted – though government abuse remains a risk when no responsible oversight exists. In recent years, Signal Foundation President Meredith Whittaker called AI technology a pure surveillance tool, describing it as a platform driven by relentless data harvesting with little regard for privacy or security.

Signal's developers are urging Microsoft to provide tools that block OS-level AI access to sensitive data. The "move fast and break things" mantra won't work here – Signal might have to drop Windows support if the platform turns hostile to privacy-focused apps.

Permalink to story:

 
This is how complicated things can become when there's no freedom (AKA closed source software) combined with a monopoly.
 
If only we had one distro of Linux that would be able to simply kill Windows stone dead, we wouldn’t have this problem.

But we can’t have that. Too much infighting, too many cooks in the kitchen, nobody wants to work together towards one common goal.

Oh, but they say in the Linux community that they want to give the user choice. Listen… most people don’t want choice, they just want it to work.
 
If only we had one distro of Linux that would be able to simply kill Windows stone dead, we wouldn’t have this problem.

But we can’t have that. Too much infighting, too many cooks in the kitchen, nobody wants to work together towards one common goal.

Oh, but they say in the Linux community that they want to give the user choice. Listen… most people don’t want choice, they just want it to work.
This fundamentally misunderstands Linux and end users simultaneously.
 
This fundamentally misunderstands Linux and end users simultaneously.
And you misunderstand most users. Again, most users don’t want to have to choose—they just want it to work. It’s why Android has been so wildly successful. Why? Because for the most part, it… just… works.

I like to think of Android as Linux for the unwashed masses.
 
What is the solution for those of us who use our systems for work and gaming?

I have installed Linux various times, but my vice is the odd COD Zombies session, and it’s one of the games that doesn’t work well on WINE emulation.

Do we need to resort to a stripped down Windows distribution? Is there something better?
 
One of my fears with all this data harvesting stems from a similar viewpoint to DNA testing like 23andme:

Today it’s used to train LLMs, but in the future it could be used in any number of ways we can’t even imagine.
 
And you misunderstand most users. Again, most users don’t want to have to choose—they just want it to work. It’s why Android has been so wildly successful. Why? Because for the most part, it… just… works.

I like to think of Android as Linux for the unwashed masses.
Again, you fundamentally misunderstand Linux and it's users. Users who want a "it just works" UNIX distro have an option: MacOS. And their userbase has been rapidly growing.

Users who choose Linux want Linux BECAUSE there is no dominant singular choice. We want options, flexibility, ece. And I can install and run Steam, Chrome, Firefox, ece from Fedora, OpenSUSE, debian, or arch distros without issue. Almost like "there's so many" is cope from those unable to manage a linux installer.

Also, the majority of distributions "just work" out of the box for 99% of users. Windows users being too stubborn to learn a new UI because "Linux scawwy UwU" wouldn't switch if there was a dominant form of linux, because its still not windows.

And it's interesting you highlight Android, when A) it's a mobile operating system with a totally different target audience (nobody is running android on a desktop, cmon now) and B) There are multiple different distros, from every manufacturer, with different installed apps and storefronts. Android is not a monolith like iOS, and yet end users have no issue using different apps on mobile. For some reason, only the desktop users cant figure that out. Hmmmm............
What is the solution for those of us who use our systems for work and gaming?

I have installed Linux various times, but my vice is the odd COD Zombies session, and it’s one of the games that doesn’t work well on WINE emulation.

Do we need to resort to a stripped down Windows distribution? Is there something better?
Run linux, and find another FPS to occupy your time, set up a windows VM with hardware passthrough, or maintain a separate windows PC for the purpose of gaming. Or get COD on a console instead.
 
If only we had one distro of Linux that would be able to simply kill Windows stone dead, we wouldn’t have this problem.

But we can’t have that. Too much infighting, too many cooks in the kitchen, nobody wants to work together towards one common goal.

Oh, but they say in the Linux community that they want to give the user choice. Listen… most people don’t want choice, they just want it to work.
It's called Mint. Not every Linux Distro is designed to satisfy the ego of the user.
 
Back