Meta, Spotify, and others unite to challenge the Apple-Google app store duopoly

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,447   +1,585
Staff member
A hot potato: App developers frustrated with Apple's and Google's "unfair" walled-garden policies have a new champion. Meta and several other organizations have formed a coalition to challenge the "duopoly" these two mobile platform giants have built. Initial efforts focus on age verification reform, but the alliance also plans to tackle several other restrictive policies maintained by both companies.

Meta, Spotify, Garmin, Match Group, and others have joined forces to form a lobbying partnership targeting the control Apple and Google exert over their mobile app ecosystems. Bloomberg notes that the Coalition for a Competitive Mobile Experience will focus on platform fairness, with its initial priority being a push to shift age verification responsibilities from apps to app stores.

The group argues that platforms – not individual developers – should handle the process of confirming user age before downloads. Utah passed a law last year requiring app stores to conduct age verification, so it's not without precedent. Meta has already made that case to lawmakers, and the coalition plans to support similar legislation at the state and federal levels. Google unsurprisingly opposes the effort, claiming that Meta is just trying to offload its responsibility under current COPPA (Children's Online Privacy Protection Act) regulations.

The group's broader mission goes beyond age gates. It wants app store operators to play fair with rival software and hardware, stop favoring first-party products, and give developers more freedom to direct users to alternative payment options. It also plans to support the Department of Justice's antitrust cases against Apple and Google.

Coalition for a Competitive Mobile Experience Director Brandon Kressin, a seasoned antitrust attorney, said the group aims to amplify concerns that smaller app makers struggle to raise alone.

"There's power in numbers, especially when going up against companies as powerful as the duopoly," Kressin told Bloomberg.

The coalition formed on the same day Apple lost a major round in its legal fight with Epic Games. A federal judge ruled that Apple can no longer block developers from steering users to external payment options or charge fees on purchases outside the App Store. That decision undercuts one of Apple's most tightly controlled policies, giving the new coalition extra momentum.

With lawmakers cracking down and courts chipping away at the status quo, the coalition is betting that collective pressure – not individual complaints – has the best shot at breaking the current walled-garden model wide open. The group is well-positioned to become a key player in reshaping the future of app store policies. Whether or not it can challenge the dominant duopoly remains to be seen, but with increasing bipartisan support, the coalition's efforts are already gaining traction.

Image credit: Yuri Samoilov

Permalink to story:

 
TechSpot applying those engagement insights with a followup article...


I'll bite.

It's a free market economy so if you don't like a company, don't so business with them. Circumvent. Produce alternatives yourself. If they don't want to give the platform its cut, then make a new one. Either way... Age verification improvments? Okay buddy.
 
TechSpot applying those engagement insights with a followup article...


I'll bite.

It's a free market economy so if you don't like a company, don't so business with them. Circumvent. Produce alternatives yourself. If they don't want to give the platform its cut, then make a new one. Either way... Age verification improvments? Okay buddy.
Monopolies are illegal in the US, and a duopoly is not much different when they both operate the same way. It's supposed to be a free market, which is why monopolistic control over a market need to be prevented.

It also make sense that app stores should handle age verification. Why have every single app have its own system when there could just be one system for the entire app store.

"Make a new one" lol. Such a fully ignorant take.
 
Monopolies are illegal in the US, and a duopoly is not much different when they both operate the same way. It's supposed to be a free market, which is why monopolistic control over a market need to be prevented.

It also make sense that app stores should handle age verification. Why have every single app have its own system when there could just be one system for the entire app store.

"Make a new one" lol. Such a fully ignorant take.

Especially when the existing market leaders will throw their weight around to block you from making a new one; for example, a few years ago Epic Games tried to partner with Oneplus to launch some "Fortnite Phones" with Fortnite preinstalled - Google caught wind of that, and threatened to pull Google Play support from all of Oneplus's products. Big part of why Google lost one of its anti-trust cases.
 
Especially when the existing market leaders will throw their weight around to block you from making a new one; for example, a few years ago Epic Games tried to partner with Oneplus to launch some "Fortnite Phones" with Fortnite preinstalled - Google caught wind of that, and threatened to pull Google Play support from all of Oneplus's products. Big part of why Google lost one of its anti-trust cases.

Yes, but why force existing entities to alter the platforms they built and own to facilitate other business instead of just focusing on the problem of anti-competitive behavior outside of those ecosystems? In other words, instead of suing Google or Apple to share their bed, why not sue Google or Apple for their methods of blocking new beds? Perhaps anti-competitive practices are now so commonplace that lawyers can only find footing in the terms of the platform itself?
 
Monopolies are illegal in the US, and a duopoly is not much different when they both operate the same way. It's supposed to be a free market, which is why monopolistic control over a market need to be prevented.

It also make sense that app stores should handle age verification. Why have every single app have its own system when there could just be one system for the entire app store.

"Make a new one" lol. Such a fully ignorant take.

Sure, monopolies are illegal, but duopolies are the American way, so far. Nothing wrong with ignorance unless you mix it with stubborness to create genuine stupidity.
 
Sure, monopolies are illegal, but duopolies are the American way, so far. Nothing wrong with ignorance unless you mix it with stubborness to create genuine stupidity.
It's not about monopolies or duopolies, it's about anti competitive behavior, which is illegal. It's not a free market, it's a relatively free market with some restrictions/protections.

Why anyone would be pro monopoly is hard to imagine.
 
Yes, but why force existing entities to alter the platforms they built and own to facilitate other business instead of just focusing on the problem of anti-competitive behavior outside of those ecosystems? In other words, instead of suing Google or Apple to share their bed, why not sue Google or Apple for their methods of blocking new beds? Perhaps anti-competitive practices are now so commonplace that lawyers can only find footing in the terms of the platform itself?
Setting aside the strange bed metaphor, you don't seem to understand what is happening. No one is suing.

The coalition of companies is lobbying lawmakers to better regulate the market. Their first effort is completely understandable: laws are being passed to verify age, fine, let's pass such laws such that the platform verifies the age once for the entire app store rather then every app doing.

This is a) more efficient for businesses, b) less hassle for customers, and c) allows for better privacy for customers (obviously more in Apple's case).

So if you want to rail against making changes at least point your angst at the entity doing said changes (the government) rather than companies trying to make the best of the new regulations.
 
Back