More workers say they'll quit instead of going back to the office full time

midian182

Posts: 10,709   +142
Staff member
In brief: As companies aggressively force staff back into the office full-time, more employees are refusing to comply with the demands. A recent study has found that fewer than half of UK workers would agree to a full-time return-to-office (RTO) mandate, with women and parents the most likely to refuse.

The report comes from researchers at King's College London (KCL) and King's Business School. They analyzed over a million data points from the UK government's Labour Force Survey (LFS) and 50,000 responses from the Survey of Working Arrangements and Attitudes (SWAA) UK.

The biggest takeaway is the "growing worker resistance to rigid office mandates." Just 42% of workers would agree to return to the office full-time, down from 54% in 2022 – it seems the longer people work from home, the less willing they are to give it up.

Between the start of 2022 and late 2024, the number of people who said they would look for a new job rather than go back to the office full time jumped from 40% to 50%. The number of workers who said they would quit straight away went from 5% to 10%.

Women were more likely than men to quit rather than go back to the office full time – 55% said they would look for another job and 8% said they'd quit outright. Among men, 43% said they would search for other work and 8% would quit on the spot.

Parents with school-age or younger children were also more resistant to full-time RTO mandates. Just 33% of mothers of younger kids said they would return to work full time.

The study also found that black and minority workers were most likely to return to the office full-time when asked, "possibly reflecting job insecurity and workplace discrimination," KCL said.

According to the SWAA data, one in four (25%) UK workers reports working remotely at least three or more days a week, while two in five (40%) work remotely at least once weekly. It found that while employers in the country have increased the average number of work from home days since 2022 from fewer than one day per week in 2022 to about 1.3 days in 2024, employers are now less likely to allow fully remote working.

Many tech giants started introducing hybrid work following the lockdowns, requiring employees to spend at least three days in the office each week. There was plenty of pushback, but most workers reluctantly agreed rather than being forced out of their jobs.

Recently, however, companies such as Google, Intel, Amazon, Nothing, and others have decided they want to keep a close eye on workers 100% of the time they're on the clock, which means bringing them back to the office full-time. CEOs and execs like 60-hours-per-week fan Sergey Brin claim working in an office improves productivity, but studies and surveys have shown that often isn't true.

Permalink to story:

 
Oh no, people with good jobs have to do a bit more!

lucky for them they can probably afford a car with driver assist and make that drive easy as pie.
 
Ah tough guys comments have started.

News flash, nobody cares if the boss cares or not. Top tech talent dictates their work conditions. They will just go work somewhere else and companies who mandate it limit their talent pool and lose their top talent.

Its a win/win.

These articles are stupid and just here to rile up the comment section so folks can be patronizing and talk down to eachother. Its weird how as a society how so many folks wish their neighbors life to be more miserable because they are also miserable. It really stands out.
 
There is always someone out there to replace you. You don't want to go back, then don't.

No there isn't, and this is such a broad statement that it borders on being laughable. Actually, it is laughable!

Not everybody is a burger flipper who can be replaced. There are ever emerging new technologies where competent employees are not a dime a dozen (like some of the miserable commenters here): The fields of AI, Robotics, machine programming, aerospace, etc come straight to mind.

If you are a competent latest tech professional, you can tell your bosses you're working from your sailboat in the Bahamas and they will gladly accept.

I know, I have been there in the 1990s and they agreed to every demand, from 4 weeks vacation on day one to countless other perks!

Now let the miserable ones bow and agree with their overlords from their tiny cubicles....someone else is laughing at them!
 
My wife was wondering why her ladies golf team had so few members return this new season. When she encountered them at the clubhouse last weekend they said it was because they were forced to return to the office. My wife responded that she was sorry to hear that their “job” was now interfering with their early-afternoon tee-times. Can’t make this stuff up.
 
No there isn't, and this is such a broad statement that it borders on being laughable. Actually, it is laughable!

Not everybody is a burger flipper who can be replaced. There are ever emerging new technologies where competent employees are not a dime a dozen (like some of the miserable commenters here): The fields of AI, Robotics, machine programming, aerospace, etc come straight to mind.

If you are a competent latest tech professional, you can tell your bosses you're working from your sailboat in the Bahamas and they will gladly accept.

I know, I have been there in the 1990s and they agreed to every demand, from 4 weeks vacation on day one to countless other perks!

Now let the miserable ones bow and agree with their overlords from their tiny cubicles....someone else is laughing at them!
It's narcissistic opinions such as these that fuel the increase in H1B visas.
 
Work from home days are OVER
I'm sitting on my doorstep taking a coffee break. WFH isn't over, it's just gotten more exclusive and the people who do it know they have a good thing and don't ID themselves as such on social media (as in ages past)... because all it does is fuel jealousy and hate.

At the highest levels of IT when it comes to executing the whims of billionaires... where you work matters even less than how much you work so long as the job gets done.
 
The best way to guarantee 100% work from home is to start your own company in your garage. Until then, you do what the people who sign the paychecks tell you to do, or go someplace else.

-If you're going to leave anyway, why not push the envelope and see if your boss bends before you do?

Real red blooded American alpha males don't just do what they're told.
 
Ah tough guys comments have started.

News flash, nobody cares if the boss cares or not. Top tech talent dictates their work conditions. They will just go work somewhere else and companies who mandate it limit their talent pool and lose their top talent.

What percentage of the people being referred to here are "top tech talent"? Probably not a lot.
 
A lot of narcissists appear to think they are top talent. Call me doubtful.
I dont need to label myself as anything. That statement stands.

My company determines my value. Top tech talent dictates where they work and when. They dont need to settle for bottom feeder roles where they are forced to commute unnecessarily to placate useless wannabe middle management managers and ineffective leadership.

Mock all you want, it reflects on you more than anyone. And not in a good light.
 
What percentage of the people being referred to here are "top tech talent"? Probably not a lot.
The studies about WFH effectiveness are based on level 1 input jobs and other roles. Not senior roles. So its a relevant point to point out. Folks in the industry dont need to pay attention to articles like this or folks like you, its irrelevant.

Im sorry you dont understand how the industry works. Perhaps some day you may learn a thing or to instead of being the patronizing person I referenced who is so miserable they want the rest of the world to be miserable with them.

If you dont want to WFH, dont do it. That's your prerogative but the assumptions folks like you make about folks who do WFH are laughable and just reflects on the character of yourself and its not in a positive light.
 
I'm sitting on my doorstep taking a coffee break. WFH isn't over, it's just gotten more exclusive and the people who do it know they have a good thing and don't ID themselves as such on social media (as in ages past)... because all it does is fuel jealousy and hate.

At the highest levels of IT when it comes to executing the whims of billionaires... where you work matters even less than how much you work so long as the job gets done.
This is exactly it. Its just folks dont get how the industry works and their egos get in the way of rational thinking.

Its why IT is one of the few professions you can get into without a college degree because it comes down to: Can you fix this problem? Do you understand this concept? Can you do this? If yes, you are hired. Nobody gives a crap about your education. They want folks who can solve problems, automate and perform technical operations with high level of competency. As a hiring people leader, I have never once looked at someones education. Solely based on the skills we are looking for.

Highly efficient IT folks are begged to stay and work at companies, not the other way around. I am guessing folks who are arguing against this have just never been in a position where they benefited from this and have no perspective (likely due to not having the skills...). They are just angry that someone's life isnt as miserable as theirs. its so odd how so many people want others to be miserable for the sake of it. Its a mental disease and brain rot through and through.
 
I dont need to label myself as anything. That statement stands.

My company determines my value. Top tech talent dictates where they work and when. They dont need to settle for bottom feeder roles where they are forced to commute unnecessarily to placate useless wannabe middle management managers and ineffective leadership.

Mock all you want, it reflects on you more than anyone. And not in a good light.
From Duke Health:
[HEADING=1]What are the symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder?[/HEADING]
Use the acronym “SPECIAL ME” to remember the nine signs of NPD.
SPECIAL ME

  1. Sense of self-importance
  2. Preoccupation with power, beauty, or success
  3. Entitled
  4. Can only be around people who are important or special
  5. Interpersonally exploitative for their own gain
  6. Arrogant
  7. Lack empathy
  8. Must be admired
  9. Envious of others or believe that others are envious of them


The readers of the comments can be the judge.
 
The studies about WFH effectiveness are based on level 1 input jobs and other roles. Not senior roles. So its a relevant point to point out. Folks in the industry dont need to pay attention to articles like this or folks like you, its irrelevant.

Im sorry you dont understand how the industry works. Perhaps some day you may learn a thing or to instead of being the patronizing person I referenced who is so miserable they want the rest of the world to be miserable with them.

If you dont want to WFH, dont do it. That's your prerogative but the assumptions folks like you make about folks who do WFH are laughable and just reflects on the character of yourself and its not in a positive light.
Wow. You sure got a lot out of my two sentences.
 
No there isn't, and this is such a broad statement that it borders on being laughable. Actually, it is laughable!

Not everybody is a burger flipper who can be replaced. There are ever emerging new technologies where competent employees are not a dime a dozen (like some of the miserable commenters here): The fields of AI, Robotics, machine programming, aerospace, etc come straight to mind.

If you are a competent latest tech professional, you can tell your bosses you're working from your sailboat in the Bahamas and they will gladly accept.

I know, I have been there in the 1990s and they agreed to every demand, from 4 weeks vacation on day one to countless other perks!

Now let the miserable ones bow and agree with their overlords from their tiny cubicles....someone else is laughing at them!

Perhaps you're employer thinks that highly of you, in which case, you are lucky. But you're blanket statement is absolutely ridiculous. First and foremost, there are many managers, owners, and CEOs who, for better or worse, look at dozens of metrics that have little to do with actual productivity. You'll find if you give them such and ultimatum, their egos, as well as the general bad idea of setting the precedent, will say goodbye as and example to prevent mass mutiny, will send you packing. Not to mention, I've worked for several owners/managers who do not understand what goes on in their area, that think they'll find another one that "looks just like you" to take your place. I've had it happen (not over work from home), just to wind up hiring me back (in one case). Not to mention, If you're expensive, they'll jump at the chance to save a buck (shareholder value, anyone?).

The only reason this has gone as far as it has, is because there are shortages in a lot of areas, and it's hard to find people. I doubt that will last forever. Of course, with the work ethic of the current crop of graduates, maybe it could.........
 
As technology advances, this work in the office/work from home argument will become mute. We're already starting to see it and probably in another 30 years half of everything that humans do will be done by AI or robots.
 
I really don't understand why one would WILLINGLY give up their free time to travel for 60-120 minutes a day not even accounting for delays/traffic jams.

In a 5 day workweek you wasted 5-10 hours on doing nothing productive, in a year with 260 workdays you wasted 10-22 days(!!) on traveling, in my country that's about the same amount of vacation days you get annually.

You can sleep longer, you don't need to force yourself to shower in the morning before work but can do that during your breaks, later or not if you want to.

You don't have to take a few hours off for appointments at home, you can have packages delivered at practically any time and if you're feeling under the weather you can still work rather than take up sick leave.

The same companies that want to see to every single day probably boast about how great work they're doing for the environment, yet they force their employees to travel hours a day in traffic for zero benefit. Employees are unhappier, are more prone to call in sick and don't see any benefit from working at the office.

My previous employer had like 20 offices, they could've easily closed 19 of them, saving both in costs and the locations could be used for something else. Perhaps they could build more houses in those districts to combat the housing crisis.

A car generally pollutes more electricity/gas one uses at home, with 39% of the EU being office employees that would perhaps actually "save the climate". But these companies want to pretend they're "green" yet they are not.
 
I work for a large engineering company and last October was the deadline to return to the office full time. The vast majority of the employees just ignored the edict and the company never mentioned it again. I work in office when necessary otherwise I'm not traveling 60 miles a day for no good reason.
 
From Duke Health:
[HEADING=1]What are the symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder?[/HEADING]
Use the acronym “SPECIAL ME” to remember the nine signs of NPD.
SPECIAL ME

  1. Sense of self-importance
  2. Preoccupation with power, beauty, or success
  3. Entitled
  4. Can only be around people who are important or special
  5. Interpersonally exploitative for their own gain
  6. Arrogant
  7. Lack empathy
  8. Must be admired
  9. Envious of others or believe that others are envious of them


The readers of the comments can be the judge.
Thanks for describing yourself. I never once talked myself up but you really seem to put high value on yourself.

Also, I like words!

jealous - adjective
hostile toward a rival or one believed to enjoy an advantage : envious
His company gave him the ability to work from home at his job which made random guy on Techspot jealous.

You are right, the readers of the comments can be the judge.
 
Back