Yes, some people can be trusted to work from home and there are cases where working from home is more efficient and good for moral. I'm just saying some cannot and they will always ruin it for those who can successfully.
Some COVID policies hurt everybody in the long run. Too much disagreement on how it should have been handled. It positively opened up WFH policies but there still needs to be balance as people have to learn to socialize in person. Some much more than others.
"Have fun wasting your time on colleagues or employees you can't trust."
I'm truly sorry that you have had such a negative experience with coworkers. I don't trust all but I certainly don't feel I'm wasting time with any...
Some people cant do WFH. No doubt this is true. They simply cannot stay focused.
On the flip side, some folks will absolutely not be productive in an office setting because they prefer to work and do their job instead of faking, pretending and gossiping with tons of distractions. Its a two way street.
I perform better in a quiet environment where someone isnt walking up to my desk every 5 minutes and trying to ask me how my weekend was.
My company was WFH prior to COVID. We are still WFH. Its a hybrid as in if you want to go to an office if its near you, you can but most of them are closing because its wasted real estate and just costing money. The huge offices, and mind you folks have a CHOICE if they want to go or not, have like 4 people in them. The offices can hold 1000s of employees.
Thats how many choose to go in and its mostly just a once a week kind of thing which I get. If I was near an office, I probably would go in once in awhile just for some facetime.
When your company evaluates employees it needs to be objective based, not staring over shoulder based. We are supposed to be professionals and adults working at these companies. In my field (Cyber Security) anyone not completing objectives assigned to them becomes very painfully obvious and they are put on a PiP. If they dont improve, they are removed from the organization and replaced until we find someone who can complete their assigned objectives.
Its that easy managing folks remotely. It comes with challenges for sure, but its a different approach than trying to manage someone in an office by staring over their shoulder (which wouldnt help the evaluate me in my work scenario tbh).
Our company doesnt actually care if you need to go pick your kid up in the middle of the work day. Have a headache? Go take a nap and let folks know. Need to fill the laundry, do it. They embrace that. We have over 25k employees and this company touches ever persons here data in some way. It wins great place to work awards every year.
They treat us like humans, not robots. Hell we are even getting an extra day off on 4th of July as a BONUS. Its now a 2 day holiday this year for us in the USA (we are global).
And you know what? We have no issues putting in a 10-12 hour day when needed. We have no issues working weekends or getting up late because of an incident. We are happy to do so and dont mind based on how they treat us.
Many companies approached WFH with a hammer and never implemented systems, processes to be successful while empowering employees to be resourceful.
Mind you, we have been profitable every year for the past 20 years (probably more but this is my limit of knowledge) and never once missed our EBIT. The only year we didnt get a raise was first year of COVID under Trump (but they did pay our bonus). Bonus's and raises every single year and embracing remote work.
If WFH meant you are lazy and cant be successful, our company would have smashed and burned years ago instead of thriving and growing significantly (Billions).
Our talent pool is also worldwide and not limited to 50-100 miles from an office. Thats huge! Some of my folks that are not near an office are the best workers we have! If we forced office mandates, we would lose some of our best folks. They would just go somewhere that allows it and they would be hired instantly.