Musk merges startup xAI and Twitter, betting on AI to revitalize social media

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 584   +13
Staff
What just happened? Elon Musk has orchestrated another move in his sprawling business empire, announcing on Friday that his artificial intelligence firm, xAI, has acquired X (formerly Twitter). The all-stock transaction values X at $33 billion, including $12 billion in debt, and xAI at $80 billion, creating a combined entity Musk says will "unlock immense potential" and provide "smarter, more meaningful experiences" for users.

In a post on X, Musk stated, "The futures of xAI and X are interconnected. Today, we officially take the step to merge our data, models, computing power, distribution, and talent."

This deal marks a significant moment for both companies, which have been on divergent trajectories since Musk acquired Twitter in 2022 for $44 billion. Following his takeover, X faced a series of challenges, including plummeting advertising revenue, mass layoffs that reduced its workforce by 80 percent, and controversial policy changes that alienated major advertisers.

Also see: Fear and favor are bringing advertisers back to X under Musk

By late 2024, Fidelity had slashed X's valuation to just $12 billion. However, the platform's fortunes began to improve after Donald Trump's reelection and Musk's appointment to lead the Department of Government Efficiency in the new administration. These developments rekindled advertiser interest and helped stabilize X's financial outlook.

Meanwhile, xAI has been on a rapid ascent since its founding in 2023. Originally established to explore the nature of the universe through AI research, xAI has become a player in the rocketing artificial intelligence space. Its chatbot, Grok – designed as an "unfiltered" alternative to rivals like OpenAI's ChatGPT – has been integrated into X since late 2023.

The company also boasts one of the world's most powerful supercomputers, Colossus, located in Memphis, Tennessee. This infrastructure positions xAI to challenge tech giants such as OpenAI and Google.

The merger consolidates the two companies' resources, which already overlap. xAI has been using data from X posts to train its AI models since 2023, following a change to X's privacy policy. This integration allows xAI to refine its algorithms using real-time data while deploying new models directly on X for immediate user feedback.

Despite Musk's optimism, the deal raises concerns about transparency and potential conflicts of interest. Both companies are privately held and controlled by Musk, prompting questions about how investors in each entity will be compensated.

For example, Columbia Law School professor Eric Talley told The New York Times that while merging the companies resolves some issues related to resource allocation, it could leave some investors feeling shortchanged if the terms favor one side disproportionately.

Social media platforms like X are increasingly being repurposed as data-rich training grounds for AI development rather than standalone businesses.

Financial analysts have also pointed out that by folding X – a company with declining value – into xAI – a rapidly growing enterprise – Musk effectively boosts the overall valuation of his holdings while leveraging synergies between social media and AI development.

This strategy mirrors Musk's 2016 acquisition of SolarCity using Tesla stock – a move that drew scrutiny at the time but ultimately aligned two businesses under a shared vision.

For users of X, immediate changes may be subtle. Paying subscribers already have access to Grok, and xAI has long used user data for AI training. However, Musk's comments suggest deeper integration is on the horizon. Enhanced AI-driven features – such as personalized content recommendations and more advanced chatbots – could redefine how users interact with the platform.

While Musk presents the merger as a game-changer for both companies and their users, it also highlights broader trends reshaping Silicon Valley. Social media platforms like X are increasingly being repurposed as data-rich training grounds for AI development rather than standalone businesses. As Musk consolidates his ventures under a unified strategy, he positions himself at the forefront of this shift – but not without controversy or skepticism.

Permalink to story:

 
Musk bought Twitter for $44B and now it's worth $33B. Maximum efficiency.

Musk: "I've only done productive things."

Also Musk, 100 tweets per day on average, and a top 20 worldwide Diablo 4 player, oh and top Path of Exile player, and present at every major social event, and finding spare time to golf at Trump's Florida palace every other day. I reckon that 56 billion bonus is seriously undervaluing our magic boy wonder's work.
 
Imagine being the world's richest man and people still posting about how you're stupid and don't understand finance. You'd have to hire someone to laugh all the way to the bank for you.

Imagine having a daddy who owned emerald and diamond mines in South Africa and gave you a fortune to buy your way into the US, to buy other companies and finally to buy his way into the government. He didn't become a billionaire by being smart, just being born lucky.
 
If you can’t grow the user base, just code one.

X, now a place where tweets can gaslight you back.

I can't resist, one more. It's too easy ;)

Elon’s always wanted a platform that talks about him, to him, by him.

Seriously though, it’s clear Elon’s plan is to use his gronk AI to fake users, fake engagement, and maybe even fake that X still matters.
 
Imagine being the world's richest man and people still posting about how you're stupid and don't understand finance. You'd have to hire someone to laugh all the way to the bank for you.
It's quite naive to assume someone is smart simply because they have a lot of money. Trump and Musk are both prime examples of this. They inherited huge amounts of money they never earned. It's easy to make a lot of money when you START with a lot of money. But do a Google search for their failed businesses and you'll be surprised. Trump for example has a list of failed businesses a mile long.

That is not to say Musk is stupid, far from it. But just being the richest man in the world doesn't automatically make you some kind of genius as so many right-wingers seem to think. A lot of it has to do with luck and timing as well.
 
It's quite naive to assume someone is smart simply because they have a lot of money. Trump and Musk are both prime examples of this. They inherited huge amounts of money they never earned. It's easy to make a lot of money when you START with a lot of money. But do a Google search for their failed businesses and you'll be surprised. Trump for example has a list of failed businesses a mile long.

That is not to say Musk is stupid, far from it. But just being the richest man in the world doesn't automatically make you some kind of genius as so many right-wingers seem to think. A lot of it has to do with luck and timing as well.
If all the cronies were backing half the political niche market he decided to carve the the other half all to himself. I guess that is dumb.
 
I think this site has found the ticket to get clicks. The lefties just can't control themselves when they see these topics.
 
Musk bought Twitter for $44B and now it's worth $33B. Maximum efficiency.
Musk bought Twitter to save democracy, not to profit. It was perfectly clear that short and even mid term profit was not in the cards. Well, Musk being Musk, he will make it profitable - it's already happening, much faster than anyone anticipated. Merging it with xAI will accelerate it even further.
 
I think this site has found the ticket to get clicks. The lefties just can't control themselves when they see these topics.

-Then demonstrate agency and leave instead of participating and providing more clicks. Your participation here emboldens and entrenches the leftism you claim to eschew.

Techspot still needs to make money and the writers still need to eat. Political stuff drives more engagement and gets more clicks from righties and lefties.
 
Musk bought Twitter to save democracy, not to profit. It was perfectly clear that short and even mid term profit was not in the cards. Well, Musk being Musk, he will make it profitable - it's already happening, much faster than anyone anticipated. Merging it with xAI will accelerate it even further.

-Rightwingers lose money it was all part of the master plan to save America. Lefties lose money "get woke go broke".

Can't make this **** up.
 
To suggest that Elon is a stupid person is comical. People may not like him but he's no *****

-I dislike the notion that human intelligence (along with, you know, all the other traits that make a person) are static.

Musk clearly was a driven and capable person at some point, but I think things started going off the deep end in 2018-ish when that bizzare spat with the cave diver began with Elon calling the guy a pedophile and sicking a private investigator on him to ruin his life.

That was sort of the first real public inkling that Musk was starting to lose his grasp on reality and getting high on his own farts. Having a Trans kid probably broke the guy's mind.

At this point what Elon was and what he is seem to have diverged pretty heavily and acting like the Elon who built these companies and the Elon who is high on his own ego today are the same person is disingenuous, regardless of which side of the argument you're coming from.
 
-Then demonstrate agency and leave instead of participating and providing more clicks. Your participation here emboldens and entrenches the leftism you claim to eschew.

Techspot still needs to make money and the writers still need to eat. Political stuff drives more engagement and gets more clicks from righties and lefties.
Sure it gets more traffic. Sure they make money on that traffic. I think the question is at what point does the site start to feel different for it.
Completely disagree that there is more traffic from the right though. The vast majority of comments on I see on these types of articles are left leaning trashing Trump and Elon. Can't say I see where you're coming from at all with comment.
 
-Rightwingers lose money it was all part of the master plan to save America. Lefties lose money "get woke go broke".

Can't make this **** up.
I was commenting on this particular case, you're making the generalizations.

You're probably correct about the woke - broke relationship though, at least I can't recall a case of profitable wokism.
 
Sure it gets more traffic. Sure they make money on that traffic. I think the question is at what point does the site start to feel different for it.
Completely disagree that there is more traffic from the right though. The vast majority of comments on I see on these types of articles are left leaning trashing Trump and Elon. Can't say I see where you're coming from at all with comment.

- So go woke... don't go broke? Money is money and as we've seen with everyone taking the knee to Tariff Man business don't have a moral compass that points away from "make money".

So what are you even complaining about? Either argue the topic or hit Techspot where it hurts (to be blunt, it's their wallet).
 
Back