New Flyby11 tool bypasses Windows 11 hardware restrictions

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 579   +13
Staff
Editor's take: The emergence of tools like Flyby11 highlights the ongoing tension between Microsoft's vision for Windows 11 and what its user base wants. As the operating system matures, it will be interesting to see how Microsoft responds to these unofficial workarounds and whether it adjusts its stance on hardware requirements.

A new tool has emerged to help bypass the strict system requirements for Windows 11. The application, spotted by Neowin, is called Flyby11, and it offers a simple way to install Microsoft's latest operating system on computers that don't meet the official hardware criteria.

Developed by Belim, a creator of several Windows customization tools, Flyby11 builds on the success of existing workarounds like Rufus, and offers a fresh approach that may appeal to users looking for alternatives.

Flyby11 sidesteps Windows 11's compatibility checks by taking advantage of a feature in the Windows Server installation process, which typically skips many of the hardware checks found in the standard Windows 11 setup.

Flyby11 provides users with two methods for circumventing Windows 11's system requirements. The first is a native method that leverages the Windows Server setup approach, allowing for an in-place upgrade to Windows 11 without the usual hardware checks. This technique takes advantage of the more lenient installation process for server environments. The second method employs a registry tweak, similar to the approach used in recent versions of the popular Rufus tool. This tweak modifies system settings to bypass compatibility checks during installation.

While Flyby11 opens up Windows 11 to a wider range of hardware, there are some important points to keep in mind. First, the tool is still in its early stages, having been released on GitHub on October 19, 2024. Also, as an unsigned application, it may be flagged as suspicious by Microsoft Defender. Finally, older CPUs lacking SSE4.2 and PopCnt instructions are still incompatible, even with this bypass.

Initial feedback from the tech community has been cautiously positive. Users appreciate the simplicity of Flyby11, though some still prefer the more established Rufus method. As one commenter noted, "No doubt this coder will get a lot of feedback and it will get polished, until then I think I like Rufus."

Microsoft's strict hardware requirements for Windows 11 have been a point of contention since the operating system's release. It requires a processor with a speed of at least 1 GHz, featuring two or more cores on a compatible 64-bit processor or system on a chip (SoC). In terms of memory, a minimum of 4 GB of RAM is necessary. Storage requirements dictate at least 64 GB of available space. The display should be high definition, at least 720p, and larger than 9 inches diagonally, supporting 8 bits per color channel. These requirements have left many machines unable to upgrade officially. As Windows 11 continues to evolve, it's likely we'll see further developments in bypass tools and techniques.

Those interested in trying Flyby11 can find it on the official GitHub repository.

Permalink to story:

 
I really don't think this guys software needs to be advertised. All he does is make new projects and abandons them every 6 months and they're all the same program. The software is buggy in all aspects most of the time, the anti telemetry settings the software sets can actually enable telemetry and this has been documented throughout all of his projects changelogs, issue reports etc. This person clearly has no dedication and makes far too many mistakes to be credible.
 
Why would you want to install an OS, that isn't designed for the hardware? Just sounds like a recipe for BSOD's down the road.
 
Why would you want to install an OS, that isn't designed for the hardware? Just sounds like a recipe for BSOD's down the road.

I've been keeping OLD Intel Xeon cpu's running for a long time on Win11 using things similar to this, why throw a perfectly good dual quad core cpu pc, that's a total of 16 cpu cores thru HT, that can still run calculations much faster than alot of the current cpu's that are both expensive and less capable.
 
Airport taxi services offer comfort and punctuality. For travelers heading to the ferry, Heysham ferry terminal taxi services provide timely rides, ensuring you arrive at the terminal or your airport smoothly without worrying about missing any connections.
 
My PC natively supports windows 11 and I don't run it, still on 10. Why would anyone want to get 11?

Long ago I tried for a month Hackintosh (installing MacOS on a normal PC), was fun as an experiment, but had many issues when there were updates. I feel this is the same, maybe now a bypass trick to put Win11 on an unsupported PC works, but who knows if MS will release some patch that breaks it. I don't like the idea of being of the edge of loosing my boot OS.
 
Why would you want to install an OS, that isn't designed for the hardware? Just sounds like a recipe for BSOD's down the road.
Well, there are two very good reasons. The first, as jzetterman said:
Those requirements are completely arbitrary and dumb, that's why.
Windows 11 is just windows 10. They are very similar operating systems. They use the same drivers. There is no logical reason why windows 11 cannot run on the same hardware. Why can a core i7 7700k not run windows 11, but a core i3 8100 can? They are the SAME architecture, they are both skylake based. Hell, Windows 11 supports the i7-7820HQ and 7820X/7800X, but not the rest of the 7000s. Why? They are the SAME.

Nothing in windows 11 requires TPM 2.0, nor Bitlocker, nor a windows account. You can easily runt he OS without any issues with all this garbage turned off. This stuff exists to get you to spend money on new computers (and make money for MS via new licenses) and for MS to have more control over your PC. The hardware restrictions are because MS wants you to spend money. They are totally nonsensical, as is proven by all the people who have previously used rufus to bypass requirements and run 11 without issues on much older hardware.

The second: there are LOTS of people out there, who are on fixed or low income, who were convinced to finally upgrade their aging pentium4 or early core 2 rigs after windows 7 had been sufficiently outdated, so they could run windows 10, the "last OS" microsoft would ever make. These people bought haswell, skylake, and kaby lake hardware. Now, MS is coming in with windows 11 and saying that this hardware, which is perfectly functional and plenty powerful enough to do anything 99% of people need, must eb thrown away and replaced.

These people dont have $700+ for a new PC just laying around. Time are tough, for a LOT of people. So you can understand how a simple tool to force 11 to install on hardware it runs fine on but isnt official, would be very appealing. It's better than staying on 10, with no security updates, for years on end like we saw with XP and 7.

As a bonus: the environmental aspect. PC manufacturing is dirty. Why should we throw away tens of millions of PCs that still work fine just so MS can play green? ACTUALLY being green would mean supporting this hardware with the new OS that runs fine on them, but MS wants to make money, not actually be green, because corpos gonna corpo.
 
Back