Researchers used AI to build groundbreaking nanomaterials lighter and stronger than titanium

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 583   +13
Staff
What just happened? Researchers at the University of Toronto's Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering have harnessed the power of machine learning to create nanomaterials that combine carbon steel's strength with Styrofoam's lightness. This development can significantly impact industries ranging from automotive to aerospace.

The research team, led by Professor Tobin Filleter, has engineered nanomaterials that offer unprecedented strength, weight, and customizability. These materials are composed of tiny building blocks, or repeating units, measuring just a few hundred nanometers – so small that over 100 lined up would barely match the thickness of a human hair.

The researchers used a multi-objective Bayesian optimization machine learning algorithm to predict optimal geometries for enhancing stress distribution and improving the strength-to-weight ratio of nano-architected designs. The algorithm only needed 400 data points, whereas others might need 20,000 or more, allowing the researchers to work with a smaller, high-quality data set. The Canadian team collaborated with Professor Seunghwa Ryu and PhD student Jinwook Yeo at the Korean Advanced Institute of Science & Technology for this step of the process.

This experiment was the first time scientists have applied machine learning to optimize nano-architected materials. According to Peter Serles, the lead author of the project's paper published in Advanced Materials, the team was shocked by the improvements. It didn't just replicate successful geometries from the training data; it learned from what changes to the shapes worked and what didn't, enabling it to predict entirely new lattice geometries.

The team used a two-photon polymerization 3D printer to create prototypes for experimental validation, building optimized carbon nanolattices at the micro- and nano-scale. The team's optimized nanolattices more than doubled the strength of existing designs, withstanding stress of 2.03 megapascals for every cubic meter per kilogram of density – about five times stronger than titanium.

The potential applications of these materials are vast. Professor Filleter envisions the aerospace industry building ultra-lightweight components for planes, helicopters, and spacecraft. The researchers estimate that replacing titanium components on an aircraft with this new material could save 80 liters per year for every kilogram of material replaced, helping to reduce the high carbon footprint of flying.

This project brought together diverse elements from material science, machine learning, chemistry, and mechanics, involving collaborations with international partners from Germany's Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, MIT, and Rice University. The next step is to improve the scale-up of these material designs. The team also plans to explore new matrices that push the material architectures to even lower density while maintaining high strength and stiffness.

Permalink to story:

 
Fairy tale until I see the product in mass production.
As is any article on "future tech"... but... this actually makes a lot more sense than "revolutionary battery tech" articles we see every week or so on here.

We already know how and why materials are strong/light/heavy/liquid/etc... instead of doing it "by hand", why not let an AI rearrange atoms and molecules?

This will almost certainly be the future of virtually all manufacturing - no reason to think nanotech would be different...
 
Artificial Intelligence still doesn't yet exist. Like the Hoverboard, it's marketing designed to fuel your imagination and open your wallet.

They used machine learning models. Machine learning models are the only thing we have. Well, that and people misusing terminology for... you guessed it! Profit.

I'll continue to drive this point home for as long as people continue to use the wrong words. It's closer to a mathematically dynamic pachinko machine than a brain.
 
Last edited:
Wish they would have scaled a bit bigger than 5mm and tested above room temperature. Reduction in strength and other useful properties is pretty likely at 1500K and above. Nobody has any idea if this stuff even can work for aerospace or if it'll have a steep decline in key parameters under real world conditions.

Either way though, this is good research unlike most of the battery garbage. The paper actually has pretty good data shared and does note that scaling up is the next step, so this is still pretty early stages.
 
Artificial Intelligence still doesn't yet exist. Like the Hoverboard, it's marketing designed to fuel your imagination and open your wallet.

They used machine learning models. Machine learning models are the only thing we have. Well, that and people misusing terminology for... you guessed it! Profit.

I'll continue to drive this point home for as long as people continue to use the wrong words. It's closer to a mathematically dynamic pachinko machine than a brain.

Yes it's the moniker used, who knows what actual researchers call these models

Think it's closer to a brain than a pachinko m/c

What is a brain, what is AI - Does a frog have a brain, is a frog intelligent , what about a raccoon?

Now if your differentiation is those are alive and must adapt like a dynamic pachinko machine

Is a one year old intelligent ? what tests could a 2 year old beat the best AI models in, Can you name one - imagine recognition , pattern recognition , classifying , logical deduction and reasoning

Thing is just making statements like yours - will be an endless patten, Every test LLM , AI , deeplearning , neural networks pass , they become trivial and not AI .

So what is your test to satisfy you , win consistently in a poker completion with imperfect info , and weirdness of human players .
Be equal to a very smart human in all areas for the same amount of power ?

What is this mythical elusive hard to define think you call IQ , is it like Art you know it when you see it.

I mean LLM models can write creatively now much netter than worse humans, we ae asking it to be defined on human terms. Ie we are judge , jury and executioners.
Would your definition work for alien lifeforms

Do you think you are glorifying humans who are not much more than dynamic pinball machines

ie if you set a AI to learn , if needed to work to get resources ( Ie find a job ) it needed , this or that info , those parts. I think if would do well enough to evolve and improve itself

 
Of course it won't get a material that is 5 times stronger than titanium in your IKEA furniture.

It would get into military, rockets, bomb shells, etc. If we are lucky it will get into aeroplanes, then if we concur is enough, it would get into your latest smartphone.
 
Yes it's the moniker used, who knows what actual researchers call these models

Think it's closer to a brain than a pachinko m/c

What is a brain, what is AI - Does a frog have a brain, is a frog intelligent , what about a raccoon?

Now if your differentiation is those are alive and must adapt like a dynamic pachinko machine

Is a one year old intelligent ? what tests could a 2 year old beat the best AI models in, Can you name one - imagine recognition , pattern recognition , classifying , logical deduction and reasoning

Thing is just making statements like yours - will be an endless patten, Every test LLM , AI , deeplearning , neural networks pass , they become trivial and not AI .

So what is your test to satisfy you , win consistently in a poker completion with imperfect info , and weirdness of human players .
Be equal to a very smart human in all areas for the same amount of power ?

What is this mythical elusive hard to define think you call IQ , is it like Art you know it when you see it.

I mean LLM models can write creatively now much netter than worse humans, we ae asking it to be defined on human terms. Ie we are judge , jury and executioners.
Would your definition work for alien lifeforms

Do you think you are glorifying humans who are not much more than dynamic pinball machines

ie if you set a AI to learn , if needed to work to get resources ( Ie find a job ) it needed , this or that info , those parts. I think if would do well enough to evolve and improve itself

Reducing fully autonomous lifeforms to philosophical parity with weighted games of chance is not a valid comparison. This is not life, it's the illusion of life, the illusion of intelligence, sold to you. I'll revisit this opinion when that changes, but not a moment before.
 
Wish they would have scaled a bit bigger than 5mm and tested above room temperature. Reduction in strength and other useful properties is pretty likely at 1500K and above. Nobody has any idea if this stuff even can work for aerospace or if it'll have a steep decline in key parameters under real world conditions.

Either way though, this is good research unlike most of the battery garbage. The paper actually has pretty good data shared and does note that scaling up is the next step, so this is still pretty early stages.
Maybe future versions will incorporate high temp ceramics designed to be heat resistant and flexible. New tech will come someday.
 
Lighter and stronger than titanium um they said in the video lighter and stronger than STEEL not Titanium there's a big friggin difference between the two
 
Lighter and stronger than titanium um they said in the video lighter and stronger than STEEL not Titanium there's a big friggin difference between the two
So many variable comparing steel to titanium. Ultra high carbon steels compare very favourably on strength to grade 5 titanium: tensile strength of UHC Steel is ~1100MPa vs 1170MPa for grade 5 titanium. Titanium though is half the density, so has a much better strength to density than UHC steel.
 
Yes it's the moniker used, who knows what actual researchers call these models

Think it's closer to a brain than a pachinko m/c

What is a brain, what is AI - Does a frog have a brain, is a frog intelligent , what about a raccoon?

Now if your differentiation is those are alive and must adapt like a dynamic pachinko machine

Is a one year old intelligent ? what tests could a 2 year old beat the best AI models in, Can you name one - imagine recognition , pattern recognition , classifying , logical deduction and reasoning

Thing is just making statements like yours - will be an endless patten, Every test LLM , AI , deeplearning , neural networks pass , they become trivial and not AI .

So what is your test to satisfy you , win consistently in a poker completion with imperfect info , and weirdness of human players .
Be equal to a very smart human in all areas for the same amount of power ?

What is this mythical elusive hard to define think you call IQ , is it like Art you know it when you see it.

I mean LLM models can write creatively now much netter than worse humans, we ae asking it to be defined on human terms. Ie we are judge , jury and executioners.
Would your definition work for alien lifeforms

Do you think you are glorifying humans who are not much more than dynamic pinball machines

ie if you set a AI to learn , if needed to work to get resources ( Ie find a job ) it needed , this or that info , those parts. I think if would do well enough to evolve and improve itself
Can an AI enjoy a flower field and deeply love its creator like a child loves his parent?
 
Can an AI enjoy a flower field and deeply love its creator like a child loves his parent?
maybe in time, enjoy the elegance of a solution or pattern.
er love probably not, that is evolution- bonding oxytocin boosted etc
A model could form attachments I would imagine given time

I'm not necessarily saying these models are intelligent, but just those who write them off, when would you be satisfied ?. I think the models use "learned intellect" to do specific things , often to a much higher level than us.
Ie I don't think the answer is binary
same for animal life - this is the cut off , these have no intelligence, these above are
There must be a gradient
Even harder to establish is consciousness - even with humans, most times we are aware or not ( deeply asleep, not dreaming , black out ) - we have very rapid movement from one state to another like a fast dimmer switch . We are not even aware of the moment we fall asleep , or can predict it exactly , even if we fall asleep in seconds . Feverish is the exception but we lose certain concepts like time, caring. We mix reality with hallucinations - so much like sleep paralysis. But with sleep paralysis you are much more aware, even if can't move body
 
Add 30 years before they make printers capable of printing it at a reasonable price (if ever). These guys basically got carried away by looking at a drawing.

Those things are as complex and expensive to produce as quantum computers. The latter have been around for over 20 years now, and we are still not any close to utilizing quantum computing in our daily life.
 
If they can mass produce this material, this will be a game changer for more than just the aerospace industry.
 
Last edited:
The airline industry might finally get lighter, but my checked baggage fees won’t.
 
Been dreaming of assembling materials atom by atom for decades, but how close are we to mass production today? 1kg of said material would take 24 hrs to print or more with said printer.
 
I remember when graphene was going to revolutionize everything from electronics to materials science. While not useless, it did not quite have the impact that was foretold.
 
Back