Researchers say they've discovered a new color that no human has ever perceived

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,644   +199
Staff member
In brief: A team of researchers in the US claim to have unlocked a color that no human has ever seen before, and they did it using lasers. Not everyone, however, is convinced of the achievement or its merits.

Five individuals participated in the experiment, which involved shooting pulses of visible-wavelength laser light directly into their eyes to stimulate individual photoreceptor cells on the retina. According to the scientists, this method theoretically enables the display of colors that lie beyond the range of natural human vision.

The newly observed color, which was reportedly seen by the five subjects, is said to be a blue-green color with unprecedented saturation and has been named "olo."

One of the study's co-authors, Professor Ren Ng from the University of California, was also a participant. He said they predicted it would look like an unprecedented color signal but didn't know what the brain would do with it. The resulting visual was "jaw-dropping," he added.

Not everyone in the scientific community is convinced. John Barbur, a vision scientist at City St George's, University of London, told The Guardian that it is not a new color but rather, a more saturated green. The work, Barbur added, has "limited value."

Ng is well-respected in the field of optics. In 2006, he founded a company called Lytro that developed some of the first light-field cameras. Lytro introduced a novel technology that allowed images to be refocused after capture. Such tricks are commonplace nowadays on smartphones but at the time, the capability was fascinating.

According to the book "Inside Apple," Steve Jobs met with Ng in 2011 to discuss bringing the tech to the iPhone. Jobs died a few months after the meeting, seemingly before any sort of deal was agreed upon. Lytro eventually released a second-gen camera before pivoting to VR and eventually shutting down in 2018.

The team's work has been published in Science Advances in a paper titled, Novel color via stimulation of individual photoreceptors at population scale.

Image credit: Getty Images

Permalink to story:

 
Umm there are already humans with four different types of cone cells, leading them to see a lot more color than normal humans can 😂 Also, most likely what happened is these people were blasted with red color laser, leading to an exhaustion of the cone cell perceiving red and over stimulation of other cone cells. All of this is detailed on Wikipedia already: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cone_cell

This is the same kind of trick a magician will use, an optical illusion.
 
What is the wavelength of this "new" color? If the color is within the range of human perception, it can be seen. If outside of it, and the technique allows one to perceive a normally invisible frequency than cool. Otherwise, it's a grab for grant money by spewing nonsense.
 
Last edited:
What is the wavelength of this "new" color? If the color is within the range of human perception, it can be seen. If outside of it, and the technique allows one to perceive a normally invisible frequency than cool. Otherwise, it's a grab for grant money by spewing nonsense.
From the abstract for the paper at https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adu1052
Theoretically, novel colors are possible through bypassing the constraints set by the cone spectral sensitivities and activating M cone cells exclusively. In practice, we confirm a partial expansion of colorspace toward that theoretical ideal. Attempting to activate M cones exclusively is shown to elicit a color beyond the natural human gamut, formally measured with color matching by human subjects.
 
They're not novel. We simply can't see most of the electromagnetic spectrum. Tricks don't make it new. I still believe it's a researcher looking for private grant money, due to federal cuts.
Interesting that you appear to be the only one using the word "novel." While I see you have some knowledge of human vision, honestly, I believe what the researcher said more than I believe you.

Lasers are capable of doing some some things that the average person would not expect (take laser cooling or being tuned to nearly an exact match for the absorption bands of many elements, for example), and it sounds like the lasers are being used to stimulate human vision cones in ways that they are not normally stimulated with ordinary, randomly polarized, broadband, and incoherent light. Perhaps this results in the vision cones becoming hyper-stimulated with a net effect of broadening the frequencies of light to which the cones respond.

Not every research is a grifter, and its likely that this research was in progress long before Trump became King of the US and started attacking scientific research funding..

The research is out there and others will likely recreate it to either verify or debunk it. That's what science is all about.
 
Interesting that you appear to be the only one using the word "novel." While I see you have some knowledge of human vision, honestly, I believe what the researcher said more than I believe you.

Lasers are capable of doing some some things that the average person would not expect (take laser cooling or being tuned to nearly an exact match for the absorption bands of many elements, for example), and it sounds like the lasers are being used to stimulate human vision cones in ways that they are not normally stimulated with ordinary, randomly polarized, broadband, and incoherent light. Perhaps this results in the vision cones becoming hyper-stimulated with a net effect of broadening the frequencies of light to which the cones respond.

Not every research is a grifter, and its likely that this research was in progress long before Trump became King of the US and started attacking scientific research funding..

The research is out there and others will likely recreate it to either verify or debunk it. That's what science is all about.
Not a grifter. Just someone looking for funding. Very common. There is very little, if anything, of use with this type of research. What is their goal? It doesn't look like it improves mankind. I've worked in science for five decades. There currently is far too much silly research. Advancing knowledge is good. But, is it useful?
 
Back