Russia to investigate Microsoft, Kaspersky says Windows Defender is anti-competitive

[ATLVM]

<p>Kaspersky also wants Windows to inform users that their security software is incompatible and will be removed <strong>before</strong> an upgrade takes place, rather than after the upgrade is complete - which is the case now.</p>

<p>Even when a program is compatible, warnings will appear informing users that Defender is off &ndash; along with a button to turn it back on. Once it is activated, third-party products are disabled. Kaspersky says that both developers and Windows users suffer because of this behavior.</p>
<

OK this is clearly wrong. As a developer you don't LET windows do you anything you test, and change settings.. defender can be controlled by API.

So if you install a competing product you are SUPPOSED to disable the offending product FIRST and make sure it's off, disable, etc.. BEFORE you continue installation..

So if they KNOW Windows sends notification that Defender is off.. then turn off the DAMN notifications for Defender Once its disabled.. again something you CAN do via API..

Kaspersky notes things that are wrong yet they are too lazy to fix it? LOL wow.. deplorable company, I can see why their products suck out loud

 

[mailpup]

ATLVM, no need to repeat yourself in multiple posts. One time should be enough.

 

[Raoul Duke]

Hmmm, if Microsoft wrote the code for the product that needs Defender or Anti-virus or Internet Security or whatever, instead of coding Windows Defender why don't they fix the product so that much of what these programs do is unnecessary

 

[Odium]

Blah blah blah

Are you not ashamed to lie? Kaspersky is one of the best AV. Just google "top 10 antivirus software" and you will always see Kaspersky in the list. I hate people who don't know a damn thing and still are acting like they are pro in something.