Scientists achieve 1,000-fold increase in solar electricity using ultra-thin layers

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 673   +15
Staff
Forward-looking: A team of German researchers from Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg has unveiled a significant advancement in solar energy technology, revealing a method to dramatically increase the amount of electricity certain materials can generate when exposed to light. Their approach involves stacking ultra-thin layers of different crystals in a precise sequence, resulting in a solar absorber that far outperforms traditional materials.

At the core of this discovery, published in Science Advances, is barium titanate (BaTiO₃), a material known for its ability to convert light into electricity, though not very efficiently on its own.

The scientists found that by embedding thin layers of barium titanate between two other materials – strontium titanate and calcium titanate – they could create a structure that produces significantly more electricity than barium titanate alone, even while using less of it.

The improvement is striking. The layered structures generated up to 1,000 times more electricity than the same amount of standalone barium titanate. The researchers were also able to fine-tune this effect by adjusting the thickness of each layer, giving them control over the system's performance.

"The important thing here is that a ferroelectric material is alternated with a paraelectric material," Dr. Akash Bhatnagar, who led the research, told The Brighter Side News. He noted that while paraelectric materials do not naturally separate electric charges, they can act like ferroelectrics under special conditions, such as at low temperatures or with slight changes to their structure.

The science behind this performance leap lies in how the layers interact. When these materials are stacked together, their ability to absorb light and manage electric charges changes. The layered structure enhances sunlight absorption and facilitates the generation of free-moving electric charges, which are essential for producing electricity.

"The interaction between the lattice layers appears to lead to a much higher permittivity – in other words, the electrons are able to flow much more easily due to the excitation by the light photons," said Bhatnagar.

To build the new material, the team used a high-powered laser to vaporize the crystals and redeposit them in layers just 200 nanometers thick. In total, they created a structure consisting of 500 stacked layers.

When tested under laser light, the current generated by this "crystal sandwich" was up to 1,000 times stronger than that of pure barium titanate of similar thickness, despite using two-thirds less of the photoelectric component. The effect proved robust, remaining nearly constant over six months.

The implications for solar energy are far-reaching. Panels made with this technology could be much more efficient and require less space than current silicon-based solar cells, making them especially attractive for urban environments where space is limited. The material is also simpler to manufacture and more durable, as it does not require special packaging.

While further research is needed to fully understand the underlying mechanisms, the results point to a promising future for solar panels and light-powered devices. By cleverly layering different materials, scientists have opened the door to generating electricity from light much more efficiently, potentially transforming the way we harness solar energy.

Permalink to story:

 
I wonder if this also means that they absorb more of the sun's spectrum?

I remember learning recently that a limiting factor for mainstream solar right now is that the materials used only absorbs certain narrow wavelengths (and using more layers can make them more efficient, but more complex)...
 
Headline is clickbait. It’s not 1000x more productive than today’s silicon solar panels, it’s a 1000-fold increase of electricity production using barium titanate: an alternative, ineffective material when used on its own.
Indeed.
Need to know two things basically performance Vs traditional panels and mass production costs.

If it's expensive it might have niche uses in space and with advancements in production might eventually be an alternative or successor.
If it's cost effective great.
If it's super cheap but not as efficient in the same area it has a use where space is cheap.
 
Let me get this straight.......by vaporizing a certain crystal of unknown cost with a high powered laser, you get a 200nm layer of unknown size. Repeat this process 500 times.and test said "solar cell" with a laser of unknown output of a single wavelength. The result is about 1000 times the output of a non standard solar cell of unknown size and unknown output with no clue as to actual performance in actual sunlight.

Another brilliant breakthrough in green science that will be ready for widespread use sometime in the next century, after we're all dead and carbon has reduced the Earth to an uninhabitable wasteland.

Can't wait. :)
 
Just like all the battery articles TS runs (seems weekly), there should be a requirement to revisit these "breakthroughs" annually for evaluation.

If even 25% of the technological energy miracles reported here had come to pass, we would be living in a post-scarcity world of free energy. And flying cars.
 
Harnessing the power of the sun is already pretty efficient. The problem is storing the energy. Storing is expensive and full of limited lifetime batteries loaded with toxic chemicals.

I have a solar backup system with a storage of about 12,000 KWH. Enough to keep important things running for about a week.

I'm not a green freak, but living in the southeast US with full sun, my 4 panels produce a lot of power.
 
Just like all the battery articles TS runs (seems weekly), there should be a requirement to revisit these "breakthroughs" annually for evaluation.

If even 25% of the technological energy miracles reported here had come to pass, we would be living in a post-scarcity world of free energy. And flying cars.
BRILLIANT IDEA FOR TS AUTHORS! I think it'd be awesome to dig back in time (TS is already known for that) and examine what exactly happened with all these "miracle" inventions and "advancements". Let's go TS, dig back 5 years into your own archives and give us updates please!
 
Harnessing the power of the sun is already pretty efficient. The problem is storing the energy. Storing is expensive and full of limited lifetime batteries loaded with toxic chemicals.

I have a solar backup system with a storage of about 12,000 KWH. Enough to keep important things running for about a week.

I'm not a green freak, but living in the southeast US with full sun, my 4 panels produce a lot of power.
It's a huge problem. I really like the idea of physical storage using potential energy. It doesn't get any greener than that. In a nutshell, you use surplus to run a motor that lifts a weight, fills a reservoir, etc. When you need the energy, you release the weight/water and collect the kinetic energy. This is popular in the EU from what I understand. I think they built one on a mountain if memory serves me.
 
It's a shame they didn't even offer potential total efficiency panel compared to current state-of-the-art solar panels that are around 23-24%. I'd like to see new panels that are far more efficient in say cloudy conditions and heck one day could even operate in the light of a full moon.
 
Back