Scientists develop battery that converts nuclear energy into electricity via light emission

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 587   +13
Staff
Forward-looking: Researchers have developed a battery that converts nuclear energy into electricity using light emission. Led by a team from Ohio State University, the technology could revolutionize how we harness and repurpose nuclear waste.

A study published in Optical Materials: X outlines how ambient gamma radiation can be harvested to generate electricity for microelectronics. The prototype battery, measuring just four cubic centimeters, achieves this by combining scintillator crystals with solar cells.

The battery's design utilizes high-density scintillator crystals that emit light when exposed to radiation, which is then converted into electricity by solar cells. Researchers tested its effectiveness using two major fission products from spent nuclear fuel: cesium-137 and cobalt-60.

Experiments at Ohio State's nuclear reactor laboratory yielded promising results. With cesium-137, the battery produced 288 nanowatts, while the more potent cobalt-60 increased output to 1.5 microwatts – enough to power a tiny sensor.

Lead author Raymond Cao, a professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at Ohio State, suggests that with an appropriate power source, these devices could be scaled up to generate watts of electricity, expanding their potential applications.

The researchers envision these batteries being deployed near nuclear waste production sites, such as storage pools or in nuclear systems for space and deep-sea exploration. Notably, while the battery harnesses gamma radiation – nearly a hundred times more penetrating than a standard X-ray – it does not contain radioactive materials, making it safe to handle.

The technology offers a potential breakthrough in repurposing nuclear waste, traditionally viewed as hazardous, into a valuable energy source. "We're harvesting something considered as waste and by nature, trying to turn it into treasure," Cao said.

The study also found that the shape and size of the scintillator crystals significantly influence electrical output. A larger volume enables greater radiation absorption and energy conversion, while an increased surface area enhances the solar cell's power generation capacity.

Ibrahim Oksuz, co-author of the study and research associate at Ohio State, described the results as a major step forward in power output. He emphasized that while the two-step process is still in its early stages, the next phase will focus on generating higher wattage through scaled-up designs.

Despite promising results, scaling up the technology presents challenges, primarily related to manufacturing costs. Cao noted that further research is needed to evaluate the batteries' long-term viability, efficiency, and durability in real-world applications.

Still, Oksuz remains optimistic about the future of nuclear-powered batteries. "The nuclear battery concept is very promising. There's still lots of room for improvement, but I believe in the future, this approach will carve an important space for itself in both the energy production and sensors industry."

Permalink to story:

 
So it now generates microwatts, and "could be scaled up to generate watts of electricity". In other words, it may eventually manage to power a light bulb ... of the new efficient types. Meanwhile manufacturing the thing and making it safe (because it'll be placed near nuclear waste) would require orders of magnitude more energy.

Does that sound like a ridiculous nonsense only to me?
 
So when they say green energy, they mean it literally...

8f01b6b901ca2fdb71aad7351fa2c338.jpg
 
This is more of a generator than a battery. Wouldn’t its lifespan be limited by the solar cell used in the conversion process?
 
While this idea itself doesn't look like it'll amount to much, it's an interesting area of study trying to up cycle nuclear waste. I figure this idea will spur other areas of research, and eventually something really practical will come from it (as science does).

I think a lot of people are figuring out that we walked away from nuclear energy a bit too quick and it's actually one of the more reliable "green" energy sources.

If we could harness power even from the spent fuel (and then less power from that spent fuel and so on) it could serve to make nuclear not only a fantastic energy source but far more economical too.
 
The concept of "base load" seems to have escaped the clever minds of green zealots.
And since when it is up to politicians to decide a technical architecture?
 
Everyone keeps saying nuclear is the solution, but I don’t trust the maintenance here. If we can’t even handle basic infrastructure, how do we ensure a nuclear plant runs safely for decades?
 
Back