Security researcher reveals Trump's email servers are out of date and insecure

Of course Trump is NOT the Secretary of State, not receiving and sending government secrets, did not attempt to wipe his hard drive, get caught lying multiple times under oath or attempt the weak excuse of nobody told her this was illegal. Because this evidently is no big deal.
 
This is hardly the first time this sort of tech site did something like this. can't recall what that last thing was now, but I commented on here about how it was a nothing story. yet when the the story of the day is private servers, hard drive wiping, and the like, all pointing to a democrat, this site was silent. but they would certainly speak up in outrage if say, trump (a private citizen by the way, not handling gov secrets) was to say unix instead of linux.
 
Yup, extremely sickening to see this political bias against Trump (I hate both candidates) but you have no parity when it came to Shillary's server. Who in the big establishment owns Techspot?
 
Yup, extremely sickening to see this political bias against Trump (I hate both candidates) but you have no parity when it came to Shillary's server. Who in the big establishment owns Techspot?

What you won't be seeing on ANY tech websites:

Hillary Clinton leaking top-secret nuclear intelligence on the debate livestreams provided on YouTube and various news websites:

http://bit.ly/2en9jGP
 
What you won't be seeing on ANY tech websites:

Hillary Clinton leaking top-secret nuclear intelligence on the debate livestreams provided on YouTube and various news websites:

http://bit.ly/2en9jGP

This is probably common knowledge at the Kremlin, I would imagine... Not saying it is ok, but... they have spies and are quite good at gathering this type of information.
 
This is probably common knowledge at the Kremlin, I would imagine... Not saying it is ok, but... they have spies and are quite good at gathering this type of information.

This comment misses the point. Entirely.

When a Navy sailor violates secrecy laws, he is thrown in prison.

When a Marine general violates secrecy laws and lies to the FBI, he is prosecuted.

When a CIA contractor violates secrecy laws, he is criminally charged.

When Hillary Clinton lies to the FBI, violates secrecy laws, destroys evidence, and endangers national security, James Comey can't find reasonable intent and she gets to run for POTUS while media people (on average) don't bat an eye.

It would be hilarious comedy if not for the magnitude of the consequences.

But let's talk about The Donald's corporate server security. A+ This is the stuff we need to know. (y)
 
davislane1, only people who haven't been brainwashed will understand what you're saying; everyone else is interested in stories of who else has Donald Trump been grabbing.
At least now we know for a fact that it was Hillary starting up violence at Trump's rallies - and if she's been inciting violence there...I wonder about the violence at black lives matters movements.
...and if she has no issue with inviting violence, what will happen when she has access to "the button"?
 
This comment misses the point. Entirely.

When a Navy sailor violates secrecy laws, he is thrown in prison.

When a Marine general violates secrecy laws and lies to the FBI, he is prosecuted.

When a CIA contractor violates secrecy laws, he is criminally charged.

When Hillary Clinton lies to the FBI, violates secrecy laws, destroys evidence, and endangers national security, James Comey can't find reasonable intent and she gets to run for POTUS while media people (on average) don't bat an eye.

It would be hilarious comedy if not for the magnitude of the consequences.

But let's talk about The Donald's corporate server security. A+ This is the stuff we need to know. (y)

True... but I was just making an interesting side point. I too feel Hillary should be in prison but there is so much corruption in the US government that the powerful can get away with anything. Unfortunately pointing this out isn't doing anything (yet) so I wanted to point out something different, that maybe people haven't thought about.
 
True... but I was just making an interesting side point. I too feel Hillary should be in prison but there is so much corruption in the US government that the powerful can get away with anything. Unfortunately pointing this out isn't doing anything (yet) so I wanted to point out something different, that maybe people haven't thought about.
And when Humpty Trumpty contracts people to do work for him and then decides he is not going to pay them, that is stealing. But being also among the powerful elite, he gets away with it. The common person feels parity with him? If the common person gets caught stealing they go to jail.

But wait. Humpty Trumpty facts according to the fact checkers at each of the debates are largely embellishments and falsifications. Personally, I do not view that as ethical behavior in the least.

Oh, wait, again. Humpty Trumpty says the fact checkers are FOS. Now I understand. ;)
 
And when Humpty Trumpty contracts people to do work for him and then decides he is not going to pay them, that is stealing. But being also among the powerful elite, he gets away with it. The common person feels parity with him? If the common person gets caught stealing they go to jail.

But wait. Humpty Trumpty facts according to the fact checkers at each of the debates are largely embellishments and falsifications. Personally, I do not view that as ethical behavior in the least.

Oh, wait, again. Humpty Trumpty says the fact checkers are FOS. Now I understand. ;)

I believe there is more to that story but for the sake of argument, I'll argue that inappropriately handling top secret classified information is far worse that skipping out on paying people for their work. Not that either is OK, but Trump didn't risk the risk the country like Hillary did. Perhaps they should both be in prison.

I vote for a reset of the US government. Remove ALL people working for the federal government, and lets start over by electing new people. Anyone who has worked for the federal government in the past is not eligible to be elected.
 
Back