Some new Model 3 Teslas are equipped with older self-driving chip because of the coronavirus...

nanoguy

Posts: 1,355   +27
Staff member
Why it matters: Tesla's new Gigafactory in Shanghai has delivered its first batch of Model 3s to local customers, but the coronavirus crisis has forced the company to install older Autopilot hardware due to supply shortages. The good news is that owners will get their cars retrofitted once the new chips become available again.

Many tech companies have been affected by the ongoing coronavirus epidemic, with issues ranging from travel restrictions for employees to canceled conferences and reduced manufacturing output. Pretty much any company that depends on China or South Korea for its supply chain is experiencing delays and disruptions in its operations.

Now it's the turn of automakers like Tesla, who has become the latest company to see the effects with the cars it produces locally in China. According to a report from the Nikkei Asian Review, the first batch of Model 3 cars to come out of the Shanghai facility is equipped with an older self-driving control chip.

The issue became apparent when several Chinese Tesla owners found out using the part number printed on the control unit of newly-bought cars weren't the same as those in the presentation sheets. That means their Model 3s didn't get version HW 3.0 which is up to 21 times faster than the previous generation, which prompted them to band together and sue Tesla for not being transparent about it before delivering the cars.

The automaker says the new version of the chip -- which enables semi-autonomous driving by controlling steering, braking, and accelerating -- has been in short supply in China, so it chose to equip the vehicles with HW 2.5. Following the public reports, the company apologized on Weibo and explained that it would retrofit the new cars with HW 3.0 as soon as it becomes available again in the region.

The Shanghai Gigafactory is supposed to have a production capacity of 500,000 cars per year, so it's not off to a great start. Tesla noted that there's "almost no difference" in driving experience between the two hardware versions of the self-driving module, but customers still feel like they've been deceived.

It's worth noting that those who didn't purchase the Full Self-Driving package don't get HW 3.0 by default, and this is also true for customers outside of China. It's likely Tesla didn't want to delay the delivery of the new cars, but it does seem like the company could be more transparent in the future.

Permalink to story.

 
I do not want to burst this bubble but the "older chip" (which is itself years ahead of any other car) is installed to those cars where the customer did not bought autopilot anyway. So the customer is in no way affected since the car does not have autopilot to begin with. The only problem will be if he wants to upgrade later on it will not be just OTA update but he will have to take the car to the service for a few hours... bummer...
 
I wasn't aware of a self "driving" chip, but I am aware of their self-wrecking chip. We will continue to keep seeing older hardware as cars get older. People barely keep tires on their car and oil changed. They are not going to keep these maintained. Even "free", it's still a hassle.
 
I do not want to burst this bubble but the "older chip" (which is itself years ahead of any other car) is installed to those cars where the customer did not bought autopilot anyway. So the customer is in no way affected since the car does not have autopilot to begin with. The only problem will be if he wants to upgrade later on it will not be just OTA update but he will have to take the car to the service for a few hours... bummer...
All the features of Autopilot are also supported by the older chip. The only features the newer chip supports that the older one doesn't aren't Autopilot features but full self-driving features (currently displaying of cones and smart summon). And Tesla confirmed that all vehicles purchased with the full self-driving package were getting version 3.0 of the hardware (the latest) so this decision would only inconvenience owners wanting to upgrade to full self-driving. So really it was the lack of communication about the assembly decision is what people are complaining about.
 
All the features of Autopilot are also supported by the older chip. The only features the newer chip supports that the older one doesn't aren't Autopilot features but full self-driving features (currently displaying of cones and smart summon). And Tesla confirmed that all vehicles purchased with the full self-driving package were getting version 3.0 of the hardware (the latest) so this decision would only inconvenience owners wanting to upgrade to full self-driving. So really it was the lack of communication about the assembly decision is what people are complaining about.
:facepalm: Tesla should figure out how to communicate then.
 
I agree it's on Tesla to be straight forward in its communications. That said, I won't be shocked if it turns out that the successful implementation of, and governmental approval of, full Level 5 Autonomy ends up requiring something beyond either chip, and/or arrives past the useful life of the batteries now shipping.
 
Back