Space Force awards $13.7 billion in contracts to SpaceX and two others for national security missions

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 587   +13
Staff
Boldly going: The US Space Force has awarded $13.7 billion in contracts to SpaceX, United Launch Alliance, and Blue Origin under the National Security Space Launch Phase 3 program. The contracts run through 2029 and mark the first time three companies will simultaneously handle top-priority military satellite missions – signaling a new era of competition in defense space launches.

SpaceX secured the largest share of the contracts, landing $5.9 billion for 28 launches. Meanwhile, ULA snatched $5.4 billion for 19 missions, and Blue Origin received $2.4 billion for seven. These launches will carry sensitive payloads – such as National Reconnaissance Office spy satellites – into orbits that require advanced technical precision. As its first attempt at an NSSL award, Blue Origin's inclusion alongside veteran contractors underscores the shifting dynamics of the military launch industry.

A closer look at the financials reveals notable cost differences between providers. SpaceX's average price per launch is around $212 million – well below ULA's $282 million and Blue Origin's $341 million. These figures include not just the launches themselves but also added services like fleet surveillance and mission-specific studies.

The NSSL Phase 3 program splits launches into two tracks: Lane 1 for commercial-style missions and Lane 2 for high-stakes national security payloads. The recent awards fall under Lane 2, demanding rigorous performance and security standards to minimize risks. This structure opens the door for newer providers in Lane 1 while reserving Lane 2 for systems that can meet the program's most complex requirements.

Phase 3 represents a significant expansion over its predecessor, with an anticipated 84 missions scheduled between fiscal years 2025 and 2029 – nearly double the number conducted during Phase 2. Of these, 54 missions are allocated to Lane 2, underscoring the importance of this segment in maintaining national security.

Each provider will use its flagship rockets for these missions. SpaceX will deploy Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy, while United Launch Alliance will rely on the newly certified Vulcan Centaur, phasing out its older Delta IV and Atlas V rockets. Blue Origin will use its New Glenn, which completed its maiden flight earlier this year but still needs additional certification before handling Lane 2 missions.

The competitive dynamics of military space launches have shifted significantly over the past decade. While ULA once dominated this sector, it now faces fierce competition from SpaceX's reusable Falcon boosters, which offer a more cost-effective alternative. Since gaining eligibility to bid on military contracts in 2015, SpaceX has captured over 40 percent of NSSL missions, solidifying its role as a key partner for the Pentagon.

Blue Origin is making strides in this domain but faces hurdles. The company needs at least one more successful flight of its New Glenn rocket to achieve full certification for Lane 2 missions, with that milestone expected by late 2026. Meanwhile, ULA certified its Vulcan rocket after two successful test flights. Designed for complex orbital maneuvers and long-duration missions, ULA hopes the rocket will differentiate it from competitors.

In addition to Lane 2 missions, Lane 1 provides opportunities for newer players like Rocket Lab and Stoke Space to enter the military launch market with lower-risk payloads destined for low-Earth orbit. These less demanding missions have fewer certification requirements, fostering broader participation while maintaining cost efficiency.

Permalink to story:

 
Article has been posted for 20 minutes and no one has posted stating that Musk has his buddy Trump giving him special favours?

While I’d like to think that means more rational minds might prevail, I’m guessing it’s just cause it was posted on a Sunday…
 
Article has been posted for 20 minutes and no one has posted stating that Musk has his buddy Trump giving him special favours?

While I’d like to think that means more rational minds might prevail, I’m guessing it’s just cause it was posted on a Sunday…
I swear to god, USA is turning into Russia. If He's not Agent Orange, vel Kraznov, then He decided to become Tzar of United States of Backwater.

I've noticed most Americans read this portal at work hours.
 
Humans have invested a massive effort into ensuring we can render ourselves extinct with the press of a button.
 
I swear to god, USA is turning into Russia. If He's not Agent Orange, vel Kraznov, then He decided to become Tzar of United States of Backwater.

I've noticed most Americans read this portal at work hours.
Us citizens are about to understand what it is to be russian
say goodbye to the dreams
There we are! Was getting worried…
Have you done any research as to weather SpaceX might actually have DESERVED the contract? Or are you just a Trump/Musk hater?
 
Article has been posted for 20 minutes and no one has posted stating that Musk has his buddy Trump giving him special favours?

While I’d like to think that means more rational minds might prevail, I’m guessing it’s just cause it was posted on a Sunday…
I already read that conversation and the reactions to it on Ars Technica so repeating it here seems unnecessary hahaha
 
Article has been posted for 20 minutes and no one has posted stating that Musk has his buddy Trump giving him special favours?

While I’d like to think that means more rational minds might prevail, I’m guessing it’s just cause it was posted on a Sunday…
Why state the obvious? And it is not the first time the fed helps Musk's enterprises. JD Vance should at least ask Musk to thank Trump publicly, no? And Biden for that matter.
Fair?

That's not to discount the awesome technical expertise and prowess the people working at those enterprises have which is indisputable.
 
One hand washes the other. That’s the government’s way.

…or, as Thomas Paine wrote in Common Sense: “government, at its best, is but a necessary evil…” couldn’t agree more. Corruption is beyond any remedy, and the people running government will not be “voted out” of office.
 
There we are! Was getting worried…
Have you done any research as to weather SpaceX might actually have DESERVED the contract? Or are you just a Trump/Musk hater?
At this point it doesn't matter anymore. There is a clear conflict of interest with Musk deciding what contracts are ok or not.

SpaceX could have 100% earned that contract, but now this is put into question because of how money is being allocated and spent by Trump's administration and DOGE. And frankly speaking, any normal administration would have solved this conflict of interest issue before awarding any contracts to SpaceX, but right now the law is optional in the US for rich people.

With DOGE working under complete secrecy, how do you know that SpaceX did not receive extra missions because Musk asked for it? Even 1 extra mission would be illegal. Hell, even an extra 100$ would be illegal.

The moment you start thinking that this situation is normal is the moment you become a lost cause with the US officially becoming a fascist country.
 
Last edited:
At this point it doesn't matter anymore. There is a clear conflict of interest with Musk deciding what contracts are ok or not.

SpaceX could have 100% earned that contract, but now this is put into question because of how money is being allocated and spent by Trump's administration and DOGE. And frankly speaking, any normal administration would have solved this conflict of interest issue before awarding any contracts to SpaceX, but right now the law is optional in the US for rich people.

With DOGE working under complete secrecy, how do you know that SpaceX did not receive extra missions because Musk asked for it? Even 1 extra mission would be illegal. Hell, even an extra 100$ would be illegal.

The moment you start thinking that this situation is normal is the moment you become a lost cause with the US officially becoming a fascist country.
DOGE doesn’t operate under secrecy lol, they publish everything: https://doge.gov/savings
 
SpaceX could have 100% earned that contract, but now this is put into question because of how money is being allocated and spent by Trump's administration and DOGE. And frankly speaking, any normal administration would have solved this conflict of interest issue before awarding any contracts to SpaceX, but right now the law is optional in the US for rich people.
So where are you going to get that normal administration from? Out of a hat?
Americans are stuck with either the Reps or Dems. And between these 2 difficult choices, the only way for them is to vote in one to erase the evils of the other, and hope that the evils of either party cannot infect, infest and fester much within a 4-year or 8-year cycle. Given that Biden nearly allowed illegals to vote in US elections, gave unprecedented security access to Iranians in government and tons of funding to terrorists (USAID, UNRWA), and allowed foreign agents to plan and execute demonstrations on campuses and in cities everywhere, I'd say the country came really close to disaster after 8 years of Democratic rule. The USA now has a new 4 years, let's hope the good outweighs the bad. Very good moves are being made in terms of national security, especially in the Middle East right now. On the home front, whether bloated bureaucracy is a Stage 4 cancer or can be eradicated by anti-cancer therapy (I.e. DOGE) is another story. The world is still waiting for Trump to drain the swamp, and it's been many, many years since that phrase was first coined.
 
DOGE doesn’t operate under secrecy lol, they publish everything: https://doge.gov/savings
DOGE operates only under complete secrecy. This is a known fact and it is something the courts have been trying to undo.

What they post on that website are "results". You have no idea how they reached those results and many of them are fake or exaggerated anyway. (proven to be false numbers) Those 140bil "savings" are just numbers used to fool ppl.

I'm seriously baffled on your claim that DOGE is transparent when you know that the first thing Musk did was to declare that DOGE is not subject to the public records laws and anything they do will not be made public. You have ZERO idea of how DOGE operates. They only thing you know is what Musk has been telling you.
 
So where are you going to get that normal administration from? Out of a hat?
Americans are stuck with either the Reps or Dems. And between these 2 difficult choices, the only way for them is to vote in one to erase the evils of the other, and hope that the evils of either party cannot infect, infest and fester much within a 4-year or 8-year cycle. Given that Biden nearly allowed illegals to vote in US elections, gave unprecedented security access to Iranians in government and tons of funding to terrorists (USAID, UNRWA), and allowed foreign agents to plan and execute demonstrations on campuses and in cities everywhere, I'd say the country came really close to disaster after 8 years of Democratic rule. The USA now has a new 4 years, let's hope the good outweighs the bad. Very good moves are being made in terms of national security, especially in the Middle East right now. On the home front, whether bloated bureaucracy is a Stage 4 cancer or can be eradicated by anti-cancer therapy (I.e. DOGE) is another story. The world is still waiting for Trump to drain the swamp, and it's been many, many years since that phrase was first coined.
Please don't. You are not "stuck", the US voted for laws to become optional and allowed Trump to create this mess.

"Given that Biden nearly allowed illegals to vote in US elections" - complete BS.

Seriously... where the hell are you getting all of these conspiracy theories? You have Trump... the guy who invited literal terrorists in the US and freed thousands, making a complete mockery of the US military... and then you point fingers at Biden?

Calling the illegal activities of DOGE "anti-cancer" shows just how completely insane the US is right now.

Let's all dance and clap at how breaking the law is normal now in the US. Court orders are no longer "orders". Laws are just optional. And conflicts of interest are just billionaires being "smart".

'Murica!
 
Ignorance excels in here, doesn't it?

There are currently 66 launch sites worldwide that are in use or have been in use at one time. Currently there are 14 of them in the US (according to a quick search online). Each location has a couple to many launch complexes (LC) that can be used at their facilities.

SpaceX has 4 locations they launch from:
* Cape Canaveral (LC-40)
* Vandenberg Space Force Base (LC-4E)
* Kennedy Space Center (LC-39A)
* Starbase (has 2 LC that can be used)

United Launch Alliance has 2 launch locations:
* Cape Canaveral (LC-41)
* Vandenberg Space Force Base (LC-3)

Blue Origin has 2 launch locations:
* Cape Canaveral (LC-36)
* Vandenberg Space Force Base (LC-9)

How often can Cape Canaveral launch a rocket?
- It has the potential for one launch from each of it's LC every two weeks.
How many active launch complexes does it have?
- 7 that are active.
How many LC can SpaceX launch from at Cape Canaveral?
- Technically 2, but only LC-40 is used for payloads. LC-13 is used for landing zones for Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy booster landings
How many companies are capable of launching payloads into orbit?
- SpaceX, United Launch Alliance, Blue Origin. There are newer companies coming out like Rocket Lab and Firefly Aerospace and Astra. The list is short and the options are few.
Can each rocket carry the same payload in terms of size/weight?
- No. The largest rocket is SpaceX Starship. It can currently handle a payload of 150 metric tons. Take ULA, they have rockets that can only carry payloads up to about 19 metric tons. However, these weights are specific to low earth orbit, going further reduces how much weight they can haul.

As you can see, each company has a specific location they launch from and specific amounts of weight they can handle. It's not like they can just line up multiple rockets at the many launch complexes when they want to. Also, each LC has a setup time and looks like (at least at Cape Canaveral) requires a couple weeks between launches. You can not just setup and say GO! Launches have to also take into consideration the weather. Sometimes bad weather can push a launch back weeks so having the ability to launch with multiple companies across multiple locations is ideal.

The use of one company to do all this work would greatly hinder the government's ability to get their necessary satellites into orbit. If you only had one company doing this you're pretty much F'ed if they run into problems and you can't launch things in the timeframe you need it done.

Everyone on here saying "They can't give it all to Elon because it would look bad!" or "DOGE needs to look into this!" or "Trump's buddy is getting all this because they're friends!" - you are all ignorant.

The company I work at, we have a few really big named customers that gets raw material from us. They also get the same raw material from multiple other companies because they'd be ignorant to rely on one sole company to provide them with materials....because what happens if that one company runs into problems and they can't get material to them? They're F'ed. What does happen in these situations, not every company has the same prices for material. I hear that the company I work for has some of the lower costs for material that goes out to one of our big customers and that other suppliers have a higher cost - it just comes with the territory. Sometimes you'll pay more from one supplier over another, but you need a constant supply from multiple locations to make sure you have material to stay in business, so that's what you have to do.

TL;DR:
A lot of companies utilize more than one vendor for materials and this is exactly what the government is doing. Just because Elon is tied to one of them you're all quick to point fingers because that's what the media tells you to do. Grow up.
 
There are currently 66 launch sites worldwide that are in use or have been in use at one time. Currently there are 14 of them in the US (according to a quick search online). Each location has a couple to many launch complexes (LC) that can be used at their facilities.

SpaceX has 4 locations they launch from:
* Cape Canaveral (LC-40)
* Vandenberg Space Force Base (LC-4E)
* Kennedy Space Center (LC-39A)
* Starbase (has 2 LC that can be used)

United Launch Alliance has 2 launch locations:
* Cape Canaveral (LC-41)
* Vandenberg Space Force Base (LC-3)

Blue Origin has 2 launch locations:
* Cape Canaveral (LC-36)
* Vandenberg Space Force Base (LC-9)
You forgot to mention that SpaceX charges the government about 30% less than ULA and Blue Origin. Well, and the fact that were it not for private space companies, NASA would be shut down.
 
Ignorance excels in here, doesn't it?

There are currently 66 launch sites worldwide that are in use or have been in use at one time. Currently there are 14 of them in the US (according to a quick search online). Each location has a couple to many launch complexes (LC) that can be used at their facilities.

SpaceX has 4 locations they launch from:
* Cape Canaveral (LC-40)
* Vandenberg Space Force Base (LC-4E)
* Kennedy Space Center (LC-39A)
* Starbase (has 2 LC that can be used)

United Launch Alliance has 2 launch locations:
* Cape Canaveral (LC-41)
* Vandenberg Space Force Base (LC-3)

Blue Origin has 2 launch locations:
* Cape Canaveral (LC-36)
* Vandenberg Space Force Base (LC-9)

How often can Cape Canaveral launch a rocket?
- It has the potential for one launch from each of it's LC every two weeks.
How many active launch complexes does it have?
- 7 that are active.
How many LC can SpaceX launch from at Cape Canaveral?
- Technically 2, but only LC-40 is used for payloads. LC-13 is used for landing zones for Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy booster landings
How many companies are capable of launching payloads into orbit?
- SpaceX, United Launch Alliance, Blue Origin. There are newer companies coming out like Rocket Lab and Firefly Aerospace and Astra. The list is short and the options are few.
Can each rocket carry the same payload in terms of size/weight?
- No. The largest rocket is SpaceX Starship. It can currently handle a payload of 150 metric tons. Take ULA, they have rockets that can only carry payloads up to about 19 metric tons. However, these weights are specific to low earth orbit, going further reduces how much weight they can haul.

As you can see, each company has a specific location they launch from and specific amounts of weight they can handle. It's not like they can just line up multiple rockets at the many launch complexes when they want to. Also, each LC has a setup time and looks like (at least at Cape Canaveral) requires a couple weeks between launches. You can not just setup and say GO! Launches have to also take into consideration the weather. Sometimes bad weather can push a launch back weeks so having the ability to launch with multiple companies across multiple locations is ideal.

The use of one company to do all this work would greatly hinder the government's ability to get their necessary satellites into orbit. If you only had one company doing this you're pretty much F'ed if they run into problems and you can't launch things in the timeframe you need it done.

Everyone on here saying "They can't give it all to Elon because it would look bad!" or "DOGE needs to look into this!" or "Trump's buddy is getting all this because they're friends!" - you are all ignorant.

The company I work at, we have a few really big named customers that gets raw material from us. They also get the same raw material from multiple other companies because they'd be ignorant to rely on one sole company to provide them with materials....because what happens if that one company runs into problems and they can't get material to them? They're F'ed. What does happen in these situations, not every company has the same prices for material. I hear that the company I work for has some of the lower costs for material that goes out to one of our big customers and that other suppliers have a higher cost - it just comes with the territory. Sometimes you'll pay more from one supplier over another, but you need a constant supply from multiple locations to make sure you have material to stay in business, so that's what you have to do.

TL;DR:
A lot of companies utilize more than one vendor for materials and this is exactly what the government is doing. Just because Elon is tied to one of them you're all quick to point fingers because that's what the media tells you to do. Grow up.
The ones who need to grow up are those who are still defending Elon and Musk after all that they've done so far. You talk about "ignorance", but willfully closing your eyes is just criminal.

We don't need the media to tell us anything, all you need to do is listen and look at what Trump and Elon are saying and doing.
 
You forgot to mention that SpaceX charges the government about 30% less than ULA and Blue Origin. Well, and the fact that were it not for private space companies, NASA would be shut down.
Not the point. Being cheaper doesn't excuse Musk and his obvious conflict of interest.

Did you like it when the White House turned into a Tesla car dealership? I still don't understand how anyone with some common sense could say: "yeah, that's normal".

Did you like it when the National Labor Relations Board was dismantled? It was Musk's pet peeves for years.

Did you like it when Musk clearly interfered with the FAA and its Starlink deal?

Did you like it when Musk fired the FDA staff investigating Neuralink?

Did you like it when Musk fired inspectors general investigating his companies?

and I can go on and on...
 
Not the point. Being cheaper doesn't excuse Musk and his obvious conflict of interest.

Did you like it when the White House turned into a Tesla car dealership? I still don't understand how anyone with some common sense could say: "yeah, that's normal".

Did you like it when the National Labor Relations Board was dismantled? It was Musk's pet peeves for years.

Did you like it when Musk clearly interfered with the FAA and its Starlink deal?

Did you like it when Musk fired the FDA staff investigating Neuralink?

Did you like it when Musk fired inspectors general investigating his companies?

and I can go on and on...
Some of us can separate the "larger issues" with the current article's point... I'm no Trump or Musk supporter - I believe they're both terrible people who are ruining the US... but...

THIS article, about awarding Space contracts, really has little to do with that. NOT awarding any of the launches to SpaceX would be far more egregious than doing so. I know people love the Left/Right debates that have polarized your country but... maybe we can leave those for political websites/articles and stick to the relevant facts here?
 
Some of us can separate the "larger issues" with the current article's point... I'm no Trump or Musk supporter - I believe they're both terrible people who are ruining the US... but...

THIS article, about awarding Space contracts, really has little to do with that. NOT awarding any of the launches to SpaceX would be far more egregious than doing so. I know people love the Left/Right debates that have polarized your country but... maybe we can leave those for political websites/articles and stick to the relevant facts here?
But ignoring the issue completely is disingenuous considering the context.

As soon as somebody mentions "conflict of interest" you have trump and elon defenders who ignore reality and talk as if we've attacked them directly.

What exactly are you separating? What are the facts?

I've written some facts in the post you quoted.

"NOT awarding any of the launches to SpaceX would be far more egregious than doing so." - people want transparency, and when Elon says NO then you cannot escape the accusations. How was the money allocated? Was Elon involved in the "negotiations"? These are perfectly legit question in the context of Elon interfering in other matters that involved his companies.

Ignoring the law and defending an obvious conflict on interest is not normal. Any other person would have been asked to step down from his position before any of these contracts were made. And this is what you would have normally demanded up until now. What changed?
 
Back