Spot the flaws in this review?

[red1776]

Alright everyone, its time to play "whats wrong with this review?"

http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1461/1/

 

[Matthew DeCarlo]

I am terrible at these kinds of games.

 

[LNCPapa]

Me too Matthew - I did try though.

 

[Leeky]

Nopes, but I'm sure your gonna tell us Red!

 

[captaincranky]

I don't need, and can't possibly afford this video card. Is that it? Did I figure it out? What do I win?

 

[Leeky]

I don't need, and can't possibly afford this video card. Is that it? Did I figure it out? What do I win?

A free one-way bus ticket to get you out of the countryside... :haha:

 

[dividebyzero]

1.Typo in the first para:

"but you'll see it is a while new beast"

-whole?
2.Query on the Just Cause 2 bench. Bokeh filter/GPU water sim enabled for nvidia cards only? (AMD cards are capable of neither)
3.Disparity between the visual graphic showing the IQ settings for Metro 2033 (4x multisample AA/16xAF + PhysX) and text description (Adaptive AA and presumeably PhysX disabled).
4. Typo in the text for HAWX 2

" using this benchmark to check out the performance of the GeForce GTX 580 versus the GeForce GTX 470"

5. Temp testing using OCCT is probably invalid. As stated in the previous page of the review, power regulation will throttle the GTX 580's performance and subsequent heat output when using this power virus. As stated by Anand "FurMark and OCCT are indeed throttled" -I assume that Anands "Program X" is Kombuster or EVGA's OC Scanner.
6. LIkewise the power consumption figures are also skewed since the card was tested under Furmark. Peak load should be around +2% (engineering sample) to - 5 to 10% (retail card) of the GTX 480.