Synology is selling outdated "proprietary" NAS SSDs at unrealistically high prices

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 1,841   +552
Staff
WTF?! Synology recently introduced a new compatibility policy governing the drives that customers can install in some of its network-attached storage appliances. Select NAS products now only support specific Synology-branded drives, and the company appears eager to capture significant profit margins on what are, in many cases, relatively low-spec components.

Synology recently started selling a new line of branded NVMe SSDs designed to "supercharge" its latest DiskStation Manager NAS models. The SNV5420 series comes in three capacities, with the 1.6TB model currently listed at a hefty $535. Despite the price, the SSD's specifications are significantly outdated, though Synology claims the drives are optimized for data-intensive environments.

The SNV5420 offers sequential read speeds of up to 3,000 MB/s and "sustained" sequential write speeds of up to 1,000 MB/s. These are standard PCIe 3.0 speeds – unimpressive in a market that is rapidly shifting toward PCIe 5.0. Even more concerning is the 1.6TB model's endurance rating: just 2,900 TBW and 3 million hours MTBF, which falls short compared to many cheaper, higher-performance SSDs on the market.

Synology states that the SNV5420 series has undergone extensive validation for use in DSM NAS appliances. The drives' firmware and components have been tightly controlled, stress-tested, and vetted to meet the "high" quality and reliability standards set by the company.

Earlier this year, Synology began requiring customers to use its branded HDDs and SSDs in select NAS models, claiming the change would deliver improved performance, reliability, and compatibility. However, the newly introduced SNV5420 SSD series reinforces criticism that the company is attempting to overcharge users by selling older hardware with increasingly outdated specifications.

Fortunately, customers still have alternatives. Most other NAS manufacturers do not impose such restrictions on the types of drives users can install. Even Synology's own latest DSM units can be configured to accept "non-compatible" drives, as detailed by German tech site ComputerBase.

Drive compatibility in Synology NAS systems is enforced via a locally stored database. Users can bypass this restriction by running an open-source script that allows them to whitelist unsupported drives. The script also offers additional features such as disabling automatic database updates and suppressing compatibility warnings for older WD drives.

While Synology insists that customers should now rely on its proprietary ecosystem of certified storage media, the company does not manufacture these drives itself. Instead, it rebrands products sourced from established third-party vendors like Toshiba and Seagate.

Permalink to story:

 
From everything I've read about them, They are in the middle of the FAFO stage. Basically a fire sale at this point. Just check who owns majority stakes in Them, the chance is It's BlackRock, Vanguard or some other leaches That decided to squize established names to oblivion. After COVID It happens to all brands around. Future looks bleak and has a face of Xi Jinping, as Chinese will take over.
 
I agree sounds like private equity or some other change in business direction to extract short term profit at the expense of ongoing reputation.

re: "Vanguard" - I'm familiar with them in their capacity as mutual funds, ETFs, index funds, etc. none of which at least traditionally involved them dictating operational business strategy. Do you have a source for Vanguard doing this now?
 
Once a symbol of quality and performance,
now it's about high prices and everything without the above mentioned
 
I agree sounds like private equity or some other change in business direction to extract short term profit at the expense of ongoing reputation.

re: "Vanguard" - I'm familiar with them in their capacity as mutual funds, ETFs, index funds, etc. none of which at least traditionally involved them dictating operational business strategy. Do you have a source for Vanguard doing this now?
Vanuard is Umbrella, or Tyrell, or Weyland-Yutani or Arasaka if you wish, of our time-frame
 
Might have to fact check some of this… first of all, you do NOT have to use Synology brand hard drives in any of their NAS offerings. SOME NAS devices simply only list those as recommended / supported… Seagate, WD, etc work perfectly fine in all of them.
Are the NVMe drives a ripoff? Probably… but again, “name” brand drives will also work fine…
 
Vanuard is Umbrella, or Tyrell, or Weyland-Yutani or Arasaka if you wish, of our time-frame

I've seen this meme a few times now and am trying to find out where it comes from. Vanguard is not like a Berkshire Hathaway that owns controlling interests and makes operating decision (and even Berkshire/Buffett is mostly hands off.) Their biggest function is making it possible for small investors to efficiently spread their investment portfolio over dozens, hundreds, or thousands of different investments at very high cost efficiency (often less than 1/10 of 1%.) To my knowledge they do not own, control, or seek to change the direction of any of those investments.
 
Might have to fact check some of this… first of all, you do NOT have to use Synology brand hard drives in any of their NAS offerings. SOME NAS devices simply only list those as recommended / supported… Seagate, WD, etc work perfectly fine in all of them.
Are the NVMe drives a ripoff? Probably… but again, “name” brand drives will also work fine…

That's how it used to be. All the recent negative attention stems from their announcement that will no longer be possible in their new offerings (not sure if that's all or some.)
 
They're using enterprise tactics on consumer hardware. A page straight from the playbooks of HP, among others.

I hear Buffalo's offerings are pretty good.
 
That's how it used to be. All the recent negative attention stems from their announcement that will no longer be possible in their new offerings (not sure if that's all or some.)
That’s not what their announcement said though… it said hard drives must be compatible for certain features but those drives will not only be sold by Synology (but obviously they will recommend those). There will be drives verified by Synology on a case by case basis if they pass Synology’s “stringent” standards… and pretty much any drive will “work” even if not officially supported…

Not exactly customer-friendly, but not the “what are they thinking” click bait title we got…
 
From everything I've read about them, They are in the middle of the FAFO stage. Basically a fire sale at this point. Just check who owns majority stakes in Them, the chance is It's BlackRock, Vanguard or some other leaches That decided to squize established names to oblivion. After COVID It happens to all brands around. Future looks bleak and has a face of Xi Jinping, as Chinese will take over.

Don't worry, the Americans are expert doing takeovers, buying companies, ripping them apart and selling them in pieces, sending people home. Or going to other counties and make price speculation. Everything as long as they can make money. So... why would people care what others do to them? I don't.
 
Back