I would have to offer a very mild push back on the value gamer rig: While the 3050 can be had for around 380 or so at least some of the times, the 6600 can usually be found for just 20 bucks more. So even without access to DLSS 2.0 (Which is being alleviated more and more everyday with FSR 1.0 and soon 2.0) It's still like 15 to 20% more performance for what, 5% more money upfront and sometimes the same price tag?
Past that point however I recently made an argument about how I would rather have a 3060 instead of a 6600 xt even though the AMD card wins most test the 3060 isn't as far behind. The 3050 is just not a good card at the current pricing it needs to reach 6500 xt level prices of under 200 before it becomes a really good value proposition but right now, I don't think anybody should be buying a 3050 over a 6600.