"The Brutalist" director clarifies the usage of AI amid intense backlash

zohaibahd

Posts: 934   +19
Staff
TL;DR: The awards season frontrunner The Brutalist faces intense backlash over using AI tools during post-production. The movie's director, Brady Corbet, responded to the criticism, stating that the crew only used AI to refine the authenticity of a few Hungarian dialogues in the film and that it didn't replace the actors' hard work.

The AI tools in question come from the Ukranian company Respeecher. Corbet told The Hollywood Reporter that they only used the tools in post-production to enhance the accuracy of specific Hungarian vowel and letter sounds spoken by Adrien Brody and Felicity Jones. He maintains that the AI editing did not replace their months of work perfecting their accents with a dialect coach.

The film's editor, Dávid Jancsó, who first revealed the AI usage in an interview with Red Shark News, explained that as a native Hungarian speaker, he recognized how challenging those nuanced sounds can be for non-native actors. Since the film had a tight budget of around $10 million, they opted to use AI to make targeted adjustments at scale rather than manually editing each sound they figured could be improved. Jancsó also insisted that the work done in post was almost identical to traditional dialogue editing techniques, except aided by technology instead of human editors.

"We were very careful about keeping their performances. It's mainly just replacing letters here and there," said Jancsó. "You can do this in ProTools yourself, but we had so much dialogue in Hungarian that we really needed to speed up the process otherwise we'd still be in post."

Jancsó also revealed that the production team used some AI in background architectural renderings. Corbet clarified that they did not use it to create or render any full building designs; they only used images made to look like dated digital renders.

Critics have praised Brody's and Jones's acting performances in the WWII refugee drama. However, the mere notion of employing AI has stoked controversy, with some arguing it should disqualify the film from awards. Besides The Brutalist, other hit films from last year, including Civil War, Alien: Romulus, and Furiosa have also faced criticism for using AI. After the 2023 writers and actors strike, such sentiments reached a boiling point that demanded reassurances that technology wouldn't replace human creativity.

The Brutalist is not the first film to use Respeecher. The AI voice cloning technology became popular after adding the voice of James Earl Jones to Disney's Obi-Wan Kenobi series.

Permalink to story:

 
I'm still confused on how ai is different than the cgi that movies use?

no one built a planet sized set for pandora in Avatar, that whole movie used computers to generate everything pretty much.

like just about every movie.

For the audience / customers for the film, there really isn't much difference; very few people care exactly how the background was done, or how voices were edited, they care about how good the backgrounds are at fitting the film, and how the end voices sound.

It is a big deal for those employed to do digital backgrounds or sound editing. AI tools do have plenty of potential to reduce the number of people needed to do those sorts of tasks, and obviously no one likes having their job put at risk due to some new-fangled machine. That said, I don't see them winning in the long run; I can't think of a single time a new, useful labor-saving device has every been successfully blocked for more than a short period of time by laws or protests. Edit - now that I think about it, it should also be pointed out that the digital back ground artist & digital sound editors themselves displaced a lot of workers; movies used to use matte paintings or have much more set work done, and sound FX was a lot more laborious when you had to bang coconuts together instead selecting "Galloping_horse01.wav" in your sound editor.
 
Last edited:
These people complaining remind me of anti GE foodies, yet they scoff ultra processed junk. Genetically modified organism is nearly every living think in the world you see - we have 8-10% of the human genome coming from viral sources - endogenous retroviruses (ERVs

TBF for drama productions things started going down hill in The Restoration period when plays were allowed to have women actors

Ai is a product of Man , just as women were made from a mans rib Genesis 2:21-22

Now because the rib is close to a mans heart a women was created with emotion
Yet AI is a product of mans mind

Make of it what you will

That's enough ranting BS for one day :)
 
I mean, everyone is focusing on the art/cgi element, but the AI was (also) used to modify/clean up the actor's performances.

That, IMO, is an immediate DQ from any sort of award baiting this film has going on (and Lord does it reek of award bait).

To quote a truly great man "The line must be drawn here, no farther!"
 
Back