The FTC is going after Big Tech "mob bosses"

midian182

Posts: 10,634   +141
Staff member
What just happened? The FTC is going after Big Tech, and it doesn't just want the henchmen; it wants the "mob bosses." Those are the words of agency Chair Lina Khan, who wants to target those in the industry who are causing the most harm, rather than increasing the number of cases.

Khan made the mafia analogy while speaking at TechCrunch's Strictly VC event in Washington, D.C., earlier this week. "One thing that's been important for me is to make sure that we're actually looking at where we see the biggest harm."

"Where do we see players that are systematically driving these illegal behaviors? Being able to go after the 'mob boss' is going to be more effective than going after the henchman at the bottom," the FTC Chair added.

Khan's comments come at a time when the FTC is going after tech giants like never before. It was reported by the Wall Street Journal last week that the commission is investigating Microsoft's deal with AI startup Inflection. Microsoft hired Inflection's CEO and co-founder Mustafa Suleyman in March to become CEO and EVP of Microsoft AI. The Windows maker agreed to pay Inflection $650 million to license its AI software.

The FTC is looking into whether the Redmond firm structured the Inflection partnership to avoid a government antitrust review of the transaction.

The FTC has also taken an interest in the AI market. It recently struck a deal with the Department of Justice to investigate Microsoft, OpenAI, and Nvidia. Team Green, which has gained a $3 trillion valuation thanks to its advanced AI hardware sales, is being scrutinized to discover if it broke antitrust laws. OpenAI and its biggest investor, Microsoft, are also under the FTC spotlight.

Other tech giants have been the target of FTC investigations over the years, including Meta, Google, and Apple. Its antitrust investigation into Amazon started in 2019. The suit's main allegation is that Amazon abuses its dominance in the market to reward merchants who use its logistics (warehousing, shipping) and advertising services, punish those who don't, and block lower prices on competing websites.

Khan said if it is successful in the cases it brings against Big Tech, it can have a beneficial impact on the marketplace. It can also act as a deterrent for other companies as they might reconsider taking part in any potentially law-breaking deals over fears of an FTC probe.

"Five or six or seven years ago, when you were thinking about a potential deal, antitrust risk, or even the antitrust analysis, was nowhere near the top of the conversation," Khan said. "And now, it is up front and center. And so, for an enforcer, if you're having companies think about that legal issue on the front end, that's a really good thing, because we're not having to spend as many public resources taking on deals."

Khan said there are up to 3,000 merger filings reported in the US annually, but just 2% of them get a second look from the government. She added that it's safe to assume 98% of these deals go through, and that even for startups looking for an acquisition, it would be better to have six or seven or eight potential suitors rather than one or two as it would promote competition and ensure they get a better valuation.

Permalink to story:

 
If they take the same approach as they did with Standard Oil and they eliminate the special protections that Internet companies have, that will fix about 95% of the problems .... then just let the courts pick them off one at a time until it gets resolved .....
 
If they take the same approach as they did with Standard Oil and they eliminate the special protections that Internet companies have, that will fix about 95% of the problems .... then just let the courts pick them off one at a time until it gets resolved .....
This might seem a bit out there, but such a tactic has worked in the past. Sounds good to me.
 
I like the idea of business being held accountable for operating in the grey in business law. However; I am not sure how much power the FTC really has now against big business. Despite what they say, I feel like it is getting worse, not better.

We need better campaign finance laws so big business will have less control over government (and over small/medium business).

Then we need better privacy laws so big business can't spy on us as much.

Then these mob bosses can be held accountable, for both business and privacy law.

But until then the foxes are running the chicken coop. And our chances to stop it are dwindling, especially with the rise of AI.

Do not accept that our loss of freedom and privacy are inevitable. Fight back.
 
So Nadella, Cook, fElon Musk, Fcukerberg, Pichai are all going to jail. Hooray.

I can't remember the last time one of these Big Business executives was put in jail. They have the money to bribe whoever they need to in order to stay out of the crowbar hotel, sadly. Pharmaceutical execs are extremely crooked, as well. 🤨
 
If they take the same approach as they did with Standard Oil... that will fix about 95% of the problems.
Oops! When the US broke up Standard Oil, the price of oil rose sharply, and didn't return to the level that Standard sold oil for twenty full years -- and even then, only did so because of technological improvements in drilling and new oil field finds, not because of "increased competition".

I can't remember the last time one of these Big Business executives was put in jail. They have the money to bribe whoever they need to in order to stay out of the crowbar hotel, sadly. 🤨
Or instead of posting tinfoil-hat disinformation, you could simply acknowledge they're not breaking the law.
 
Oops! When the US broke up Standard Oil, the price of oil rose sharply, and didn't return to the level that Standard sold oil for twenty full years -- and even then, only did so because of technological improvements in drilling and new oil field finds, not because of "increased competition".


Or instead of posting tinfoil-hat disinformation, you could simply acknowledge they're not breaking the law.
No one but perhaps extreme right wingers believe that! Pharmaceutical companies are the most prosecuted corporations in the entire US legal system.
 
No one but perhaps extreme right wingers believe that! Pharmaceutical companies are the most prosecuted corporations in the entire US legal system.
I'm not sure why you moved the goalposts from tech companies to pharmaceuticals, but your statement is only true if by "prosecute", you include civil lawsuits for drug side effects and the like. Not criminal cases.
 
I'm not sure why you moved the goalposts from tech companies to pharmaceuticals, but your statement is only true if by "prosecute", you include civil lawsuits for drug side effects and the like. Not criminal cases.
The last details that I saw were that the pharmaceuticals were the most prosecuted corporations by the US DOJ. Corporations in general, but the big and obscenely wealthy ones in particular, tend to be the most problematic. That tech corporations would be under the DOJ microscope does not surprise me. If that seems too objectionable to you then how old are you? Do you live on the same planet as the rest of us? Or are you just a contrarian by nature? In any event, have a good day.
 
Back