This topic seems close to my problem. If anyone with sufficient knowledge can help I would be grateful.
My problem is the following.
Router A is the main VDSL router/gateway for TV and Internet. It has limited options. Wi-Fi disabled.
Router B is a DD-WRT Device. Wi-Fi enabled.
A and B are connected via a LAN cable
Here is the task:
A. One of the computers must be directly connected (wired) to main router A.
B. Rest of the computers must be connected via wireless to router B (dd-wrt) in order for me to be able to make certain access restrictions on them.
C. Computer connected to A must be able to access all the other devices on B.
D. All Devices must have internet access.
Here is what I have tried so far, for all settings router A was a DHCP Server with a range of 192.168.2.10 - 192.168.2.100 and internal ip of 192.168.2.1. Subnet mask on all devices was 255.255.255.0
1) I had router B in DHCP forwarder mode, but in this mode, the router was unable to enforce the access restrictions for the devices connected to it. Even if the router mode was set to gateway. all other tasks A) C) D) were achieved.
2) I had router B in DHCP Server mode connected through WAN port with DHCP pool from 192.168.1.100 - 192.168.1.150. Internal IP of router B was 192.168.1.1. In this case the devices on B had internet, I was able to apply restrictions. Devices on B saw Router A but my device on A was unable to see router B or any of the devices on B.
3) I had router B in DHCP Server mode again through WAN port but this time with DHCP pool from 192.168.2.100 - 192.168.2.150 to match the ip adresses of A but in a different range. Internal IP of router B was 192.168.2.2. In this case the devices on B had NO internet access. which is weird.
Is there any way I can achieve my goal? I know the easy way is to put all the devices on B including the other computer, but I rather have that computer on router A without having to pass router B. Can a certain subnet mask combination make (3) work?
Moderator note: This post moved from this thread: https://www.techspot.com/community/...use-the-same-subnet-mask.196920/#post-1378127
My problem is the following.
Router A is the main VDSL router/gateway for TV and Internet. It has limited options. Wi-Fi disabled.
Router B is a DD-WRT Device. Wi-Fi enabled.
A and B are connected via a LAN cable
Here is the task:
A. One of the computers must be directly connected (wired) to main router A.
B. Rest of the computers must be connected via wireless to router B (dd-wrt) in order for me to be able to make certain access restrictions on them.
C. Computer connected to A must be able to access all the other devices on B.
D. All Devices must have internet access.
Here is what I have tried so far, for all settings router A was a DHCP Server with a range of 192.168.2.10 - 192.168.2.100 and internal ip of 192.168.2.1. Subnet mask on all devices was 255.255.255.0
1) I had router B in DHCP forwarder mode, but in this mode, the router was unable to enforce the access restrictions for the devices connected to it. Even if the router mode was set to gateway. all other tasks A) C) D) were achieved.
2) I had router B in DHCP Server mode connected through WAN port with DHCP pool from 192.168.1.100 - 192.168.1.150. Internal IP of router B was 192.168.1.1. In this case the devices on B had internet, I was able to apply restrictions. Devices on B saw Router A but my device on A was unable to see router B or any of the devices on B.
3) I had router B in DHCP Server mode again through WAN port but this time with DHCP pool from 192.168.2.100 - 192.168.2.150 to match the ip adresses of A but in a different range. Internal IP of router B was 192.168.2.2. In this case the devices on B had NO internet access. which is weird.
Is there any way I can achieve my goal? I know the easy way is to put all the devices on B including the other computer, but I rather have that computer on router A without having to pass router B. Can a certain subnet mask combination make (3) work?
Moderator note: This post moved from this thread: https://www.techspot.com/community/...use-the-same-subnet-mask.196920/#post-1378127
Last edited: