m4a4
Posts: 3,809 +5,440
Yes and no. It's more about quality control here. MS feels that greater control would benefit the ecosystem better, and thus you have to get through hoops.Gotta agree with you there. However IMO, small developers should be able to publish their games without Microsoft towering over them. That doesnt mean MS has to completely step back.
One example of quality control I've heard about is devs paying for submitting patches (quite a bit too). Basically, test your game properly and make sure it's of good quality before release so you don't waste your money. The only problem I have with that is it's a set $$ amount (from what I've heard), so it hurts the indies that can't afford it. IMO, it should be based on income or something like that...