Your computers CPU Speed.. Using SuperPi

Status
Not open for further replies.
KingCody said:
you say it as if you can go out and buy a 4.7GHz chip, or that anybody can overclock the 2.9GHz stock to 4.7GHz and above.

this is simply not the case, that is an unique and very extreme overclock. the CPU is cooled with liquid nitrogen, the average overclocker could not come anywhere near those speeds.

also the 1.34v seems a little fishy for such a high clock, how do we know that is real? and not a photoshop'd screenie???
Quick response from TAM about Vcore:
cpu-z seems to be not reporting the correct Vcore as he set max 1.6V in Bios and actual was 1.56V


i got 1m31s with my Intel 550 3.4HT@3.74. 2x512mb Corsair XMS PC3200 2-3-3-6
 
1m 33s

non of them are OC :l , i want them to last like my old machine.. 5-6 years span before doing a major upgrade.
3.5ghz AMD 393 w/393 mobo which some nice poster recommend. Running every game at max included Oblivion/CSS/COD2/GRAW running flawlessly.
x1900xt
1 gig ram
2mtestbycondorrp0.jpg
 
KingCody said:
it's a socket939

maybe this will convince those who think there is no reason to upgrade from 754 to 939 ;)


I guess a bit late but to defend my processor:)
1:25 on AMD 754 3700@2.5 ghz, about the same as a 939 processor on that speed.
Maybe this will convince those who think there is a reason to upgrade from 754 to 939;-) (apart from dual core then..)
 
wow those conroes are nice but dangg.. that price is just ugh.. considering the AMD X2's just had price drop.. a massive one.. im not so sure anymore =(
 
1.33 2m

Athlon 64 3700+ 754 in laptop
1 gig of ram with 30 process's

I have a 3800 x2 at stock clock and a p4 prescott 3.0 running at 3.6 wich i will have to try it on.
 
winesuperpiag8.png


Opteron 165 @ 2.8 GHz (FSB 311 MHz)
2 GB DDR400 CAS3

I guess it would be a bit faster in Windows, but I don't care that much.

Oh, and 2M calculation time was 1m 12.515s.
 
Lazy to post a picture right now, but 33 seconds at 2729MHz on an Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (stock 2GHz). Gonna see how it fairs at 2.8GHz, which I'm going to get to... right now.

Besides, I'm a loyal AMD fan so... Even though intel has a faster processor on the market right now I still have 100% hope in AMD. The next processors will surely be AMD > intel.
 
C2D E6600 OC to 2.9

And 2 gigs of ram
47 sec for 2 mil with 42 processes
 

Attachments

  • Pi.JPG
    Pi.JPG
    93.3 KB · Views: 11
Me

Core 2 Duo e6600 @ stock (2.4
2gb PC6400
49 sec to 2mil
38 Processes running

Twit and Don's OC'd version of my CPU didnt seem to help too much with this test....Sure it would be a smack down in gaming benchmarks though :D
 
Ewww... 1:03 for 1M?? Wow thats bad even for a XP 2800. My old XP-M 2800 got like 52 if I cut down the processes to 18...
 
I had 44 processes. Its probably got a ton of unnecessary services on, and a lot more services than a home system typically would since its on a domain and some other crap that goes along with that. But it doesn't really matter, the comp does what its needed to do. Hell a 1Ghz tbird with 512 megs of ram and XP would be plenty.

Got 29 seconds I think for my 6400 at home with a ton of crap opened. I started it on 32M right before I left to come back to work.
 
Here's the outcome at 1M with my current specs (below in sig.):

untitled24fi.png


I think my old Celeron D got 1:40 or something.
 
26 minutes 29 seconds for 32M

44 processes open including a paused 40some minute flash video.

2.19Ghz Core2Duo 6400, 2 gigs ram
 
Mine-
29 Seconds @ 1.86Ghz
23 Seconds @ 2.33Ghz (IDK How I got this to work but It did once, and I have screenshot)

I only had it at 2.33Ghz once, then I had to do a CMOS reset, and since my Mobo is ****ty, i dont know how to do it again.

Run on a E6300 and 2GB DDR2-667 @ Cas-5
 
SNGX1275 said:
9 minutes 29 seconds for 1M on a K6-2 400Mhz with 112 megs of RAM
I think my system can come in about second place:

This is an AMD Sempron 3000+ socket 462 with 448MB of RAM & 47 running processes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back