Home › News › Industry News
Comcast discloses network management practices
The FCC launched an investigation into Comcast’s network management practices earlier this year following accusations that the company is blocking access to certain file sharing applications on its network. Looking to gather additional information on the situation, the agency opened a public comment period on whether “degrading peer-to-peer traffic” violates FCC rules for reasonable network management.
Today is the deadline for that comment period and Comcast has responded with a filing with the FCC admitting it messes with certain P2P protocols, but only “in a minimally intrusive way, and only when necessary, based on purely objective criteria.”
Comcast explains that its P2P throttling is not based on the content of the files users are sharing or the identity of the users who are doing the sharing, and that its techniques: only affect the protocols that have a demonstrated history of generating excessive burdens on the network, only manage those protocols during periods of heavy network traffic, and only manage uploads (when the customer is not simultaneously downloading) with the goal of stopping unattended machines from using significant upload bandwidth.
The company maintains that this network management is “reasonable” and that it is fully consistent with the FCC’s 2005 Internet Policy Statement. Consumer groups and some Internet companies, however, argue that blocking or slowing users’ access to the web collides with the very principles of a fair and open Internet.
Today is the deadline for that comment period and Comcast has responded with a filing with the FCC admitting it messes with certain P2P protocols, but only “in a minimally intrusive way, and only when necessary, based on purely objective criteria.”
Comcast explains that its P2P throttling is not based on the content of the files users are sharing or the identity of the users who are doing the sharing, and that its techniques: only affect the protocols that have a demonstrated history of generating excessive burdens on the network, only manage those protocols during periods of heavy network traffic, and only manage uploads (when the customer is not simultaneously downloading) with the goal of stopping unattended machines from using significant upload bandwidth.
The company maintains that this network management is “reasonable” and that it is fully consistent with the FCC’s 2005 Internet Policy Statement. Consumer groups and some Internet companies, however, argue that blocking or slowing users’ access to the web collides with the very principles of a fair and open Internet.
Related Stories
User Comments (1)
Post a comment|
thejedislayer
on February 13, 2008 3:50 PM |
Then why not just have come clean in the first place then? Yeah, sure, I remember them saying something like that awhile back, but this really has caused a lot of customers on their network to be personally ****** off. I mean why wait until the deadline? Maybe I'm not seeing it from all angles and I know I'm not.[Edited by thejedislayer on 2008-02-13 16:01:56][Edited by thejedislayer on 2008-02-13 16:02:39] |
Most Popular
| Trending | Featured |
-
iOS 5.1.1 untethered jailbreak tool released, supports 4S, iPad 3
-
After five days, Facebook ranks as worst IPO flop of the decade
-
Rumor: Windows 8 RC will launch June 1, will ship with Adobe Flash
-
Rumor: AMD "Piledriver" FX CPU production to begin Q3 2012
-
Diablo III becomes the fastest-selling PC game in history
Editors' Storage Picks
Subscribe to TechSpot
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and tech breaking news.