Most Popular
| Top Stories | Commented | Featured |
Weekend Open Forum: Google Chrome OS and the future of cloud computing featured
Tech Tip of the Week: Unearth Region-Specific Windows 7 Themes featured
Google previews its upcoming Chrome OS
Mozilla reveals 2008 revenue, rumors say Firefox coming to PS3
Xbox Live bans prompt class action lawsuit
Sony: PlayStation 3 to be 3D-capable via firmware update
TS Community
| User Gallery | Recent Discussion |
1st house by RGLover641 | SevenMCE for 2009 by tipstir |
My Gaming Rig by Moltar | My Setup by Adhmuz |
Information Technology
Image linking requires licensing, says Vuestar
If you ever needed more proof on how broken the U.S. patent system is, take a look at this interesting newsbit. Another company hell-bent on making a profit by reselling IP has apparently started invoicing other companies for linking to pages through images. Yes, as simple as it sounds, that's what they are attempting to do. “Vuestar” as they call themselves was awarded a patent in 2006 that is terribly generic, claiming ownership over a method of “locating web pages by utilizing visual images”.
As the article brings out, Google Image Search would be a blatant example of patent infringement, along with millions of other pages on the Internet, automated or not. They incorporate along with the patent a claim over locating pages using distributed computing, which is what the basis of modern search is based upon – from Yahoo to Microsoft to Google and more. With many high-profile companies (such as SCO) trying to bleed the world of cash by abusing IP, it's no surprise that small fry companies think they can do the same. Their site even goes so far as to say that even the telephone companies providing Internet access must pay for licensing simply for providing access. It's ridiculous, and I hope that as time goes on the utter absurdity of claims like these will force a new look at a patent system that seems more prone to abuse than anything else.
As the article brings out, Google Image Search would be a blatant example of patent infringement, along with millions of other pages on the Internet, automated or not. They incorporate along with the patent a claim over locating pages using distributed computing, which is what the basis of modern search is based upon – from Yahoo to Microsoft to Google and more. With many high-profile companies (such as SCO) trying to bleed the world of cash by abusing IP, it's no surprise that small fry companies think they can do the same. Their site even goes so far as to say that even the telephone companies providing Internet access must pay for licensing simply for providing access. It's ridiculous, and I hope that as time goes on the utter absurdity of claims like these will force a new look at a patent system that seems more prone to abuse than anything else.
User Comments (2)
Post a comment| canadian on May 28, 2008 9:28 PM | I hate how even with all this stuff happening, the US still has way better technology and services than Canada
|
| nic on May 29, 2008 6:25 AM | Another good reason not to have software patents ...
|
TechSpot RSS



