Most Popular
| Top Stories | Commented | Featured |
ATI Radeon HD 5570 Review featured
AMD's six-core Thuban to have feature like Turbo Boost?
Google to launch Twitter-like service for Gmail
Intel Core i5-based MacBook Pros coming soon?
Intel unveils Itanium 9300 series enterprise processors
Netflix to roll out 1080p streaming later this year
TS Community
| User Gallery | Recent Discussion |
Contest by Bruun | Ubuntu Desktop by tw0rld |
Google will... by Julio | 666 GB left on my 1TB HDD by dustin_ds3000 |
Industry News
Image linking requires licensing, says Vuestar
If you ever needed more proof on how broken the U.S. patent system is, take a look at this interesting newsbit. Another company hell-bent on making a profit by reselling IP has apparently started invoicing other companies for linking to pages through images. Yes, as simple as it sounds, that's what they are attempting to do. “Vuestar” as they call themselves was awarded a patent in 2006 that is terribly generic, claiming ownership over a method of “locating web pages by utilizing visual images”.
As the article brings out, Google Image Search would be a blatant example of patent infringement, along with millions of other pages on the Internet, automated or not. They incorporate along with the patent a claim over locating pages using distributed computing, which is what the basis of modern search is based upon – from Yahoo to Microsoft to Google and more. With many high-profile companies (such as SCO) trying to bleed the world of cash by abusing IP, it's no surprise that small fry companies think they can do the same. Their site even goes so far as to say that even the telephone companies providing Internet access must pay for licensing simply for providing access. It's ridiculous, and I hope that as time goes on the utter absurdity of claims like these will force a new look at a patent system that seems more prone to abuse than anything else.
As the article brings out, Google Image Search would be a blatant example of patent infringement, along with millions of other pages on the Internet, automated or not. They incorporate along with the patent a claim over locating pages using distributed computing, which is what the basis of modern search is based upon – from Yahoo to Microsoft to Google and more. With many high-profile companies (such as SCO) trying to bleed the world of cash by abusing IP, it's no surprise that small fry companies think they can do the same. Their site even goes so far as to say that even the telephone companies providing Internet access must pay for licensing simply for providing access. It's ridiculous, and I hope that as time goes on the utter absurdity of claims like these will force a new look at a patent system that seems more prone to abuse than anything else.
User Comments (2)
Post a comment| canadian on May 28, 2008 9:28 PM | I hate how even with all this stuff happening, the US still
has way better technology and services than Canada
|
| nic on May 29, 2008 6:25 AM | Another good reason not to have software patents ...
|
TechSpot RSS



