Europe is testing air conditioners that don't use any refrigerants at all

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,016   +59
Staff
The big picture: A new generation of cooling technology is beginning to move from lab testing into early real-world trials, as researchers and startups look for ways to cool buildings without relying on traditional refrigerants. The push comes as demand for air conditioning accelerates in Europe, where rising temperatures are exposing the limits of both existing systems and the buildings they are meant to cool.

Several of these new approaches are now being tested. Some rely on metals that cool when stretched and released. Others use semiconductors, magnetic fields, or pressure-sensitive materials to move heat without the chemical refrigerants used in conventional air conditioning. Most are still in early stages, but the activity reflects a growing effort to rethink how cooling works at a fundamental level.

The urgency reflects how quickly climate conditions are shifting beyond what much of Europe's infrastructure can handle. In late June, temperatures exceeded 40 degrees Celsius in parts of the region, triggering a surge in demand for cooling equipment. In France, shoppers forced their way into stores to grab portable air conditioners and fans before supplies ran out. The International Energy Agency estimates that by 2050, two-thirds of households worldwide could have air conditioning.

Europe remains behind other markets, with about 20% of households using air conditioning, compared with roughly 90% in the United States. In the UK, adoption is closer to 4%. But that gap is expected to shrink as heat waves become more frequent, ..particularly in countries where air conditioning has not historically been a priority.

Cooling is no longer just about comfort. It affects productivity, sleep, and public health, especially during prolonged periods of extreme heat. Research has linked access to air conditioning with lower mortality rates during heat events, including an estimate that nearly 200,000 premature deaths among people over 65 were avoided globally in 2019.

At the same time, scaling conventional air conditioning presents its own set of challenges. Most systems still rely on refrigerants that cycle between liquid and gas to transfer heat. While effective, they are energy-intensive and carry environmental risks. Cooling already accounts for about 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions, and demand for electricity used in cooling is expected to more than triple by 2050.

The refrigerants themselves are under increasing scrutiny. Fluorinated gases, widely used today, can have a global warming impact thousands of times greater than carbon dioxide if they leak. The European Union moved in 2024 to phase them out. "In the next few years, air conditioners and heat pumps using these gases won't even be able to be sold here," Fabian Voswinkel, an energy-efficiency policy analyst at the IEA, told Wired. Alternatives such as propane and ammonia are available but introduce trade-offs, including flammability and toxicity.

Those limits are pushing researchers toward solid-state cooling, a category of technologies that eliminates the need for refrigerants altogether. Instead, these systems rely on materials that change temperature when exposed to external forces such as mechanical stress, electrical current, or magnetic fields.

At Saarland University in Germany, researchers are testing nickel-titanium alloys that generate a cooling effect when stretched and released, a process known as elastocaloric cooling. Early results suggest the approach could lower indoor temperatures by 5 to 10 degrees Celsius and operate more efficiently than conventional systems.

The team, led by Paul Motzki, is working with Irish company Exergyn to develop refrigerant-free heat pumps and expects initial deployment in new buildings within the next few years. Motzki said the technology "could lead to disruption, even a paradigm shift, because the technology is so different from established cooling systems."

Other companies are testing different approaches. Mimic Systems is testing a semiconductor-based heat pump that uses electrical currents to move heat, with a prototype installed in an apartment in Vancouver. Germany-based Magnotherm is developing cooling systems that rely on magnetic fields and plans to test them in a German supermarket chain before expanding into air conditioning. In the UK, Cambridge spinout Barocal is working with plastic crystals that release heat when compressed and has raised $10 million in seed funding.

For now, most of these systems remain unproven at scale. Lindsay Rasmussen, who works with climate-tech startups at Third Derivative, said the technologies are "promising, but unproven at scale," adding that "the space can move quickly if the right capital and partnerships are in place." Their path to market may depend on whether large manufacturers adopt and scale them.

Even with new technologies, rising cooling demand cannot be addressed through equipment alone. Much of Europe's building stock was designed to retain heat, and dense urban areas tend to trap it. Researchers and policymakers are increasingly calling for a "cooling hierarchy" that prioritizes reducing heat buildup through design measures such as shading, ventilation, and reflective materials before turning to mechanical systems.

Some cities are already experimenting with broader infrastructure solutions. Paris has expanded its district cooling network, which circulates chilled river water through underground pipes to cool public buildings. Voswinkel said such efforts reflect a growing recognition that adapting to rising temperatures will require more coordinated planning.

Permalink to story:

 
As an American, I can't wait to use these! Sucks that Europeans won't be able to use them, you guys will have to keep baking in those concrete coffins at a rate higher then American pew pee deaths.
 
As an American, I can't wait to use these! Sucks that Europeans won't be able to use them, you guys will have to keep baking in those concrete coffins at a rate higher then American pew pee deaths.
Yes the rate of Europeans getting warm in buildings is higher than American pew pee deaths, that's a cold hard (or should we say WARM!!!) fact we can all get behind
 
I struggle to understand why European adoption of air conditioning has lagged other regions of the world, when air conditioning is also one of the most energy-efficient forms of heating as
well as cooling. I know air conditioners decades ago struggled to heat in sub-zero (Celsius) temperatures, but CO2-refrigerant aircon units can work efficiently down to -10C, which would cover the southern parts of Europe (Spain, Portugal, France, Italy, UK, Germany, etc), the bulk of the European population. The idea that air-conditioning is only needed for cooling is 60s/70s-era thinking.
 
I struggle to understand why European adoption of air conditioning has lagged other regions of the world, when air conditioning is also one of the most energy-efficient forms of heating as
well as cooling. I know air conditioners decades ago struggled to heat in sub-zero (Celsius) temperatures, but CO2-refrigerant aircon units can work efficiently down to -10C, which would cover the southern parts of Europe (Spain, Portugal, France, Italy, UK, Germany, etc), the bulk of the European population. The idea that air-conditioning is only needed for cooling is 60s/70s-era thinking.
 
I feel there is a reason why most air-conditioners are still using gas/ refrigerant that makes it the most popular option. The reason is likely cost. Replacing it sounds like a great idea, until it hits the market and nobody buys it over conventional refrigerant based air conditioners due to high price.
 
Meanwhile AI data centers around the world are burning through huge amounts of energy and turning the planet into a furnace forcing a technology down peoples throats that nobody wants. Will Sam Altman, Elon Musk, Jensen Huang and Mark Zuckerberg be made personally accountable and be forced to make reparations for the climate catastrophe they are knowingly bringing down on the rest of us?
 
I feel there is a reason why most air-conditioners are still using gas/ refrigerant that makes it the most popular option.
No, the primary reason is efficiency. Solid-state Peltier cooling, for example, is generally about 1/3 the efficiency of refrigerant-based systems, meaning it would require triple the electricity to operate. Conversely, evaporation systems (aka "swamp coolers") are more efficient than refrigerant systems, but only in hot, arid regions. They also consume large amounts of fresh water, and have other drawbacks as well.

But rest easy, if and when one of the alternatives discussed in the article is developed to the point it actually does win on efficiency, it'll be widely adopted. The fear, though, is that the myopic authoritarian regimes in Europe will simply mandate adoption outright, whether or not it makes sense.
 
Meanwhile AI data centers around the world are burning through huge amounts of energy and turning the planet into a furnace forcing a technology down peoples throats that nobody wants.
You are becoming increasingly detached from reality. Total power consumption by AI is some 0.5% of total world electric use, and infinitesimal compared to what the planet receives from that large fusion reactor we call the sun -- more solar heat strikes the planet in 10 seconds than is generated by AI in an entire year.

As for the asinine absurdity of claiming that "no one wants AI", that's rather than a 1890s pig farmer claiming no one wants that new-fangled electricity in their homes.
 
You are becoming increasingly detached from reality. Total power consumption by AI is some 0.5% of total world electric use, and infinitesimal compared to what the planet receives from that large fusion reactor we call the sun -- more solar heat strikes the planet in 10 seconds than is generated by AI in an entire year.

As for the asinine absurdity of claiming that "no one wants AI", that's rather than a 1890s pig farmer claiming no one wants that new-fangled electricity in their homes.

So... basically you are saying:
- AI farms (mainly in the US and eventually China) are ok because they "just" consume as much power as 415 million people. So... That makes it ok lolol

- the same but as 10 seconds of the sun's solar energy... So it's ok...despite we can't "capture" even a tiny fraction of it ... Big LOLOL

- so, the AI which can and is already making: water, pollution, energy costs, unemployment rise despite not being truly necessary, you compare it with the electricity which was really necessary for about everything.

Great comparisons you make LOLOL
 
Yes the rate of Europeans getting warm in buildings is higher than American pew pee deaths, that's a cold hard (or should we say WARM!!!) fact we can all get behind
Pew pew has a lot more indirect effects.

At the same time, global warming is causing this new reality for Europeans, they can't be blamed for something new that is happening in their region.
And those refrigerants are a real problem, the generations after us still need to live here, we can't poison the air and soil for them.
Growing airco usage might even be the reason that climate change is accelerating. (Due to refrigerants).

Personally I don't envy Americans, they have lots more problems with their food quality, forbidden substances, pew pew, unaffordable education or healthcare, crazy cheetoh leading them, etc
 
I struggle to understand why European adoption of air conditioning has lagged other regions of the world, when air conditioning is also one of the most energy-efficient forms of heating as
well as cooling. I know air conditioners decades ago struggled to heat in sub-zero (Celsius) temperatures, but CO2-refrigerant aircon units can work efficiently down to -10C, which would cover the southern parts of Europe (Spain, Portugal, France, Italy, UK, Germany, etc), the bulk of the European population. The idea that air-conditioning is only needed for cooling is 60s/70s-era thinking.
Easy answer, the general populace in a lot of the European countries have bought into the climate change hysteria and think that mass adoption of A/C will doom the world! And their leaders push the hysteria pretty hard, even though you can easily find instances of blatant hypocrisy. Rules for thee, but not for me.

They would rather have their old and vulnerable people die from heat-related causes (very preventable) than dare defy the climate change cult.
 
Back