Sign up for a new account or log in here:
Without further ado, let's see what the latest rumors are saying, and add our own thoughts about each:
To add to the excitement, Nvidia recently released its Quadro 265 driver, which specifically references a new kernel with a version number 6.2 (Windows 7 is 6.1), according to WinRumors. Furthermore, it includes references to Windows 8:
; NVIDIA Windows Vista / 7 / 8 (64 bit) Display INF file
DiskID1 = "NVIDIA Windows Vista / 7 / 8 (64 bit) Driver Library Installation Disk 1"
NVIDIA_WIN8 = "NVIDIA"
There have been many leaks related to Windows 8, but all we really know for sure is what Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said less than two months ago. When asked about the riskiest product bet that the software giant is currently developing, he answered "the next release of Windows" without so much as a second of hesitation.
eww... I like my NT interface. ![]()
The only good news to me that I care about is the last two, since I intend to use SSDs in the very near future, and I hibernate my computer all the time.
Rumors of course, but either way...
2 interfaces = double headaches for the tech support and sys admins
The interface of Windows NT will be abandoned.
Could be going the direction of google chrome.
Windows 8! Microsoft hasn't even let Windows 7 finish taking root in the market.
Who is going to buy a Windows 8 license, when they just spent $100 to buy a Windows 7 license, less than a year ago?
Nothing so special about this list of leaks. The best one is improved SSD management. What is 2 interfaces? Is it similar to desktop switching in Ubuntu, switching from one desktop to another? or Is it just a simple theme change? I hope Windows 8 would make your life easier, faster and more enjoyable.
I call BS on most of these rumors for the following 3 reasons.
2012 is too soon.
3d interface has no business value right now
microsoft have never forced consumers to make any types of hardware changes
Mike
http://www.windows8update.com
32-bit should be killed
Teamwork guy has a point... I'm thankful though that my university has a strategic alliance with MSDN and I get free of charge OS (Only a license... dont dream too much xD) =D
sure glad ive mostly migrated to linux, i sure wont be using windows again other than gaming on xp anytime soon it appears. ill abandon my aging hardware when its dead and/or too slow to be useful on the modern internet, not because microsoft wants me to.
im praying linux gains alot more traction,microsoft needs to be taught a lesson
Let's hope they just stop with their Home/Pro/Ultimate versions non-sense.
I'll delay any of my comments on the rumors, simply because I don't like to criticize too much before seeing an idea in action, but I will comment on anyone arguing the release date.
Aside from the gap between Windows XP and Windows Vista, it is common for new versions of the product to be released at a regular (three or so year) interval.
Release dates of consumer versions of Windows:
1990 - Windows 3.0
1992 - Windows 3.1
1995 - Windows 95
1998 - Windows 98
2000 - Windows Me (yikes!)
2001 - Windows XP (phew...)
2006/2007 - Windows Vista
2009 - Windows 7
*2012* - Windows 8? ... not at all unbelievable.
Why are they still on x86, its time to kill it and force the market to go x64 >_>, bad Microsoft! bad Microsoft! no food for you today.
I think a 2 interface option might be fine, if one is optimized for standard desktop use and the other is a true optimized touchscreen UI. It would definitely make it easier to cover the gamut of desktop/laptop/tablet hardware, and give users flexibility options.
But if it's just 2 different interfaces that are similar, but one has bells and whistles, and the other is utilitarian... What's the point? Make it possible to dial up/down features in that kind of situation, so you have some convergence.
Really, Windows 8? ... Bah! ... Bla Bla Bla!
6.2 = 6.1+0.1 = 6.0+0.2
or
Windows 8 = Windows 7 + 0.1 = Windows Vista + 0.2
That is a fraud!
It sounds like it is going to feel heavy on PCs like running Vista was, and won't feel "light" like windows 7.
I believe it is necessary to return Windows XP to the market!
Microsoft change the number of versions, just as soon as Fedora does with its version of Linux.
![]()
No other Linux changes so fast!
(sarcasm)
what happens when they get to version 95.0?
Is that mean the death of Linux once for all and let Microsoft re-control totally so a few will get filthy rich?
i don`t need 3D or 64 bit.
^ what he said!
I don't need to be forced into hardware i don't require or bells and whistles bloat. I need my computer to fulfill a set of requirements that don't change on a 2 year cycle. If I need to run linux to do that, it's no sweat off my brow.
You people that want to 'abolish' my computer because it's not 64 bit can just kiss my backside.
@vipor231, I have been hearing about Linux gaining traction for so many years now, but still less than 1%. It has it's uses It's a great operating system but, it's not a mainstream OS. The available programs are not ready for prime time. And they never will be. The mainstream user does not want to compile anything, nor do they even know what compile means. Nor do they want to know. The typical PC user is worried and confused when an install wizard pops up. Linux is an operating system for geeks, who don't game. So accept it and move on. As long as you have Linux, and you enjoy it, why do you even care? Something else to consider, if some developer ever dums down Linux enough for the typical PC user, you will really be upset. Because it will no longer be the geeky OS that you know and love.
I consider myself an 'enthusiast', I know quite a few enthusiasts, I don't know anyone who wants to "abolish" your computer....except a few of the fellas in the black helicopter, but...they're kind of weird...ya know how they are.
| Trending | Featured |
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.