OpenAI to pay $3.2 million over allegations it favored visa holders and discouraged US job applicants

midian182

Posts: 11,798   +179
Staff member
What just happened? OpenAI may be celebrating its recent milestone of hitting more than one billion weekly active users, but the company has just received some less-welcome news. Both the ChatGPT maker and a subsidiary must pay $3.2 million to settle US Justice Department allegations that they discriminated against US applicants by favoring temporary visa holders for jobs and discouraging US applicants.

The settlement addresses allegations that OpenAI and Statsig, which makes product development software, violated the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) by preferring visa holders for jobs during the Permanent Labor Certification (PERM) process. INA bars discrimination based on citizenship.

PERM allows a US employer to sponsor workers for permanent resident status. However, the employer must prove that no qualified, willing, or able US workers are available for the jobs.

The DoJ investigation found that OpenAI did not advertise positions it sought to fill through the PERM program on its external job website. It also required applicants to mail paper applications instead of submitting electronic ones for positions.

Also read: OpenAI reaches one billion active users as it cuts GPT-5.6 prices by up to 80%

OpenAI also took other steps to discourage US workers from applying, such as advertising positions on the radio late at night.

"It is illegal to discriminate against U.S. workers by preferring temporary visa holders for jobs," said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon.

OpenAI will pay $1.2 million in civil penalties and establish a back-pay fund of $2 million to compensate victims.

The agreement also requires OpenAI to train its personnel on the INA's anti-discrimination requirements, revise its employment policies, and be subject to departmental monitoring and reporting requirements to prevent future discrimination.

OpenAI denied any wrongdoing in the settlement agreement.

The DoJ says that this is the 13th settlement since last year in cases where companies allegedly discriminated against US workers.

TSMC has faced similar accusations. In 2024, more than a dozen current and former employees sued the chipmaker, alleging that it favored Taiwanese and Chinese workers in hiring and promotions while subjecting American employees to greater scrutiny, poorer treatment, and a hostile workplace.

The case expanded in June 2025 to include 15 additional plaintiffs, bringing further claims of anti-American and racist comments, exclusion from Mandarin-language meetings, and US workers being replaced by Taiwanese visa holders.

That lawsuit remains active in California federal court and has not gone to trial or been settled. As of August 2026, the parties are still in discovery, with the judge issuing orders in late July concerning electronic records and TSMC's responses to document requests.

Permalink to story:

 
Honestly it just seems like they went for cheap ads and ironically went for an application method where people can’t just get an AI to do it
 
Cheap labor for our richest businessmen is like the sweetest candy. They are addicted to it.
And it does not matter if they have 80 millions or 80 billions. They will want it even when they become trillionaires. Well, like all unhealth y addictions, it needs to be treated. They won't do it; someone else has to.
 
3.2 million? Yeah, that slap on the wrist sounds about right. I wonder how many congresspersons own OpenAI stock. I'm guessing plenty. H1Bs should be eliminated outright.
Think it’s more the administration not liking that software engineers need the be imported
 
F*ck OpenAI!

Think it’s more the administration not liking that software engineers need the be imported

No, they don't. H1B (migrant labor in general) is just another form of corporate welfare.

What's really funny is seeing the same people who complain that big corporations aren't paying taxes, or who complain that those same corporations need to pay a "living wage", are also completely okay with H1B.
 
F*ck OpenAI!



No, they don't. H1B (migrant labor in general) is just another form of corporate welfare.

What's really funny is seeing the same people who complain that big corporations aren't paying taxes, or who complain that those same corporations need to pay a "living wage", are also completely okay with H1B.
Actually H1B recipients normally earn more than the average in the field and cost the company more to employ
 
Actually H1B recipients normally earn more than the average in the field and cost the company more to employ

You aren't considering that averages are skewed by the fact that most of these H1-B workers are concentrated in places where the wage is already significantly higher than the national average. In other words, it's not surprising that an H1-B in Silicon Valley is out-earning the equivalent domestic worker in a more rural setting. It's almost a perfect representation of Simpson's Paradox.

Nor does your position account for the fact that wages tend to stagnate when the qualified talent pools is artificially inflated... to the benefit of corporations.
 
You aren't considering that averages are skewed by the fact that most of these H1-B workers are concentrated in places where the wage is already significantly higher than the national average. In other words, it's not surprising that an H1-B in Silicon Valley is out-earning the equivalent domestic worker in a more rural setting. It's almost a perfect representation of Simpson's Paradox.

Nor does your position account for the fact that wages tend to stagnate when the qualified talent pools is artificially inflated... to the benefit of corporations.
Aside from your argument doesn’t make sense as the average of H1B visa earners earn more in the same job, we’re comparing workers in the same job in the same area as is defined in the law and ontop of that employers have to sponsor them and pay to bring them over. A H1B employee is significantly more expensive than a domestic worker. Also if there’s a labour excess you can’t bring in someone on a H1B visa.
 
Back