Sign up for a new account or log in here:
Not to to sound grumpy or anything, but why publish this if these issues were already fixed? Chrome is very secure, but not invulnerable; that's a given with pretty much any software. How is this any different than publishing an article about 2 bugs Microsoft found in Firefox, which have been fixed a year ago, for example? In that example, and in this case, I just don't see the... how should I put it? Well, relevance.
Now let's talk about IE...
So bugs from 2 release cycles ago make news...?
Are they aware this will eventually backfire at them?
Nonetheless, fair competition is always welcome and will benefit everyone in the end.
This news article makes me think I'm reading a tabloid...
I think the point is that both exploits were reported as fixed but MVR is saying they are working with the exploits *now*, not that they are messing with exploits from old builds (as doing so is more or less pointless since chrome auto-updates all the time). But there is a bit to be desired regarding the explaination of what they're actually saying.
If if serves no other purpose, it lets people know that flaws were actually found. M$ is good about the open remediation of its vulnerabilities. Other business models may vary, such as fixing flaws, and not telling users they were ever there.
The fact that Microsoft is willing to spend time looking into exploits on a competitors browser, while still having one of the most easily exploitable browsers of their own, is pretty sad.
How about fixing your own software first Microsoft?
@Captain
Exactly, you said 'others' but I always suspect Google 'silently' patches up its baby, and tell us 'it has released a new version' ...... how convenient !
| Trending | Featured |
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.