also @ TechSpot: Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Review

The Best Sub-$100 SSDs Tested, Reviewed

By

On November 13, 2012, 9:52 PM Breaking News

Computers relying solely on age old hard disk drive technology should be deemed a thing of the past. Mechanical devices suffer from slow response times, so if and when performance matters, spending a small amount of money on upgrading a PC's boot drive could pay off enough to render other potential upgrades useless.

But of course, the major issue with SSD adoption over the past few years has been price, the astronomically high price when you are counting in hundreds of gigabytes. In today's comparison review we are going to look at 8 popular SSDs that cost $100 or less and feature capacities of up to 128GB.

The contenders include the OCZ Vertex 4 128GB, Samsung 840 120GB and Crucial m4 128GB. The most affordable high-capacity SSD featured in our roundup is the Kingston SSDNow V+200 120GB, while the OCZ Vertex 4 64GB, Crucial m4 64GB and Samsung 830 64GB should all offer stellar performance for under $80.

Read the complete review.

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

User Comments: 28

Got something to say? Post a comment
  1. Staff

    , post: 1252166, member: 169488"]I don't think this is quite fair on the price/GB chart; I'm not entirely familiar with how the manufacturers configure the drive and how much space you actually have to use but... .

    You are right I don't think you are entirely familiar with how it works. It's no mistake that some drives are called 120GB and others 128GB, there is believe it or not an 8GB difference in capacity once formatted.

    However you are right about the Vertex 4 pricing, it should be 90c rather than 89c, can't believe I am having my balls busted over 1c I will fix that now.

    , post: 1252166, member: 169488"]Secondly the chart treats 120GB ssds as though they are 120GB, and AFAIK they are 128GB but are called 120GB as a manner of subtracting out a bit to make a round number and to compensate for space lost with TRIM. IMO it is unfair to calculate the values like this, it should be 128GB for all 128GB drive, 96 for the Kingston HyperX 3K and 64 (as it is) for all 64GB drives.

    So the Samsung 840 should actually be 86c.

    That's not at all how it works :S

    Anyway call it unfair if you want but I think it's irrelevant whether the stated capacity or formatted capacity is used for the cost per gigabyte calculation.

  2. I'm not sure either ? I thought that it was that they should show a capacity difference when formatted because some manufactures allocate space for RAISE or TRIM or something and it's unusable and doesn't show up as available space... but that they're all in fact 128GB drives. I think it'd be very weird logistically to only have a 120GB drive?

    Anyway I suppose it doesn't really matter and formatted capacity may be better if you're not able to adjust the trim/raise space (if it exists).

    I have good confidence that the $90 Samsung 830 128GB is the best choice and would have won though

  3. My laptop drive is 135GB formatted. One 128GB won't do it as I need to move around files to get the image down to 70-80GB, which I am not in the mood for. The Sammy 128GB 830 has been under $90 for the last month or so. I have thought of using two 90GB's or 128GB's in RAID 0 on the laptop but I really didn't want to spend more than $100.

    I want a 256GB but I fear getting even an Agility 4 for about $100 isn't going to happen so we'll see come next week.

Recently commented stories

Post a new comment

Social Login & Guest Posting TechSpot Members
Login here or sign up for free,
it takes about a minute.
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.
TechSpot on:

Subscribe to TechSpot

Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.