You are talking about something I was not relating. You should read the article and then contrast that with what I said. That is, if you were trying to make some sort of point. Hint: The article is talking about funding climate change, not studying the sun.I trust the consensus of actual scientists studying the sun over the opinions of random people on the internet. If they say that the incoming solar radiation doesn't account for the warming, then I'm inclined to defer to their results.
And BTW, people burn down mansions with cigarette lighters.
You know, "climate change" is about to happen here. We are going from winter to spring! LOL