nickslick74
Posts: 550 +4
Wonder what ramifications this will have in the graphic card and chipset arena's?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14008460/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14008460/
Didou said:Why would Intel or nVidia have an official press release concerning two other companies ?
We must admit to being a bit shocked to learn that ATI made eighty per cent of its chipset revenues from its Intel chipset deal. Now Intel is withdrawing and doesn't want ATI's chipsets anymore. At least, it doesn’t need it for the entry-level integrated chipset market, as its own 865G chipset can project a Vista premium compliant graphic.
Microsoft originally put Intel in misery by deciding that vertex shading has to be done in hardware for Vista. This was too much for Intel's integrated graphics to cope with. That’s why you will get some Intel integrated graphics chipset with full Shader Model 4.0 support at some point in 2007.
The executives, Ruiz and ATI CEO Dave Orton, along with Dirk Meyer and chief AMD bean counter Bob Rivet were agreed the deal would provide better value to customers and shareholders in both companies. Bob said the merged company would be better positioned to achieve AMD's stated objective: to "break the monopoly".
The new company will achieve "cost synergies" worth $75 million by the end of 2007, increasing to $125 million by the end of 2008, the executives claim. By then, the company will be well into its "integration plan", more details on which it promised to deliver soon.
you'll have to excuse my "apple ignorance" , but why does it affect apple? does ATI make the MAC'c chipset for Intel models?Rick said:Apple is now in a pickle too, since Intel is abandoning ATI