Computer mice are often inexpensive and basic, but some of them boast all kinds of extras. In this Anatomy feature we'll dig into the guts of one inexpensive mouse and one Logitech MX model to see how the two compare on the inside.
Computer mice are often inexpensive and basic, but some of them boast all kinds of extras. In this Anatomy feature we'll dig into the guts of one inexpensive mouse and one Logitech MX model to see how the two compare on the inside.
Thanks for the feedback - I should have done a proper autopsy and pulled all of it apart (which I've just done so!), and you're right: it's a rotary encoder.Small correction: I am pretty sure that is not a potentiometer ("pot", for short). Pots usually have hard limits on their rotation, and they are usually less than 360 degrees apart. Instead, it is more likely to be a simple, non-addressable rotary encoder: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotary_encoder, more specifically, its probably an incremental encoder https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incremental_encoder. These don't have hard stops on them usually, and can rotate more than 360 degree. I supposed you could do the trick with a pot, but I am not sure why you would since it would probably be easier to do with an encoder since that would likely already be digital (and a pot would require an ADC somewhere in the system).
Yeah. Just remembered. What about the balls?Not complete until you cover roller-ball mice!
Having to pop the ball out occasionally to clean off dirt on the rollers. The performance boost thereafter was so satisfying. Nowadays? Mice working consistently all the time? Unacceptable!Yeah. Just remembered. What about the balls?