Anonymous goes on DDoS rampage after MegaUpload shutdown

Leeky said:
My point in the article was the timing of the FBI raid on Megaupload. It was almost perfect in respect to the timing after the events of the previous day. It is entirely possible authorities predicted the response it would receive, and therefore timed it exactly when they did as a means to provide further evidence of the legislation being required further down the line. Time will tell on that, as always.

You have a point - though I'm old enough to remember guys on my submarine putting on their Wise Voices and saying that Martin Luther King was going too far, too fast, and such changes take time. Sometimes it takes out of the ordinary events to force a rethinking of positions.

This demo that Anonymous is growing at viral rates like the Occupy non-organization did won't necessarily backfire. After all, the U.S. government is already operating in panic mode, like any centralized power system faced with a nobody-in-charge, decentralized and persistent public reaction showing that the power-wielders have lost their legitimacy among large, maybe huge, sections of the populace.

Could Anonymous have pulled this off without access to resources unsuspected by those in power? Additional panic-mode reactions by the government (like that FBI nose-thumbing at an already pissed off digital public) won't necessarily help them maintain their centralized power. Not when the populace has been screaming for policy changes, not aggressive reaction. Nonresponsive incumbents up for reelection should probably be feeling very nervous this year.
 
they need to attack select sites that generate alot of sales and cash flow that is the only way to get there attention loss off money.
 
You obviously don't understand the concept of a bot-net. There doesn't need to be a group involved in planning an attack. A single bot-net commander can have his network of virus infected computers across the world attack a site in moments, and its virtually untraceable as all of the IP addresses used to attack don't actually belong to the perpetrator of the attack.

I commend Anon for their work, but until they can take control of predator drones over the internet or break into CIA's network and dump Obama's emails, I doubt they will have a major real world effect other than showing the world why not to leave their sensitive info online.
 
Guest said:
Isnt it funny. A loose knit group of cyber-****** crashes some websites. Yea thats going to change public opinion.....not! Really the ANON ppl are pretty damn dumb in general. AT some point everything you do on a computer is tracked somehow and someway. Eventually they are going to get caught. So you crashed some websites whoopee!! ANON's actions are no more effective then
a little kid prank calling someone. If ANON wants to be taken seriously they need to take actions that do little more then inconvence ppl. It looks more like ANON is throwing a temper tantrum then doing anything radical. WAH! WAH! You arrested someone!! So im going to DDoS your websites. ANON seems to forget that the world ran non stop before the internet. And if the internet goes down...I guess ppl will have to actually do something radical....face to face communication lol.

You missed the point entirely. It wasn't ANON throwing a temper tantrum. The government wants to censor the internet and are already finding excuses to do it without SOPA or PIPA being passed. ANON was simply giving them a taste of their own medicine by effectively censoring them.
 
I am so glad that ANON. took a stand for those of us who are not hackers. I would probaby do the same thing as I think this new law is bogus. Makes me wondewr who is behind the new law???
 
Anonymous really have jumped the gun on this one: I have read the indictment and Mega* have done a LOT of things that are downright illegal and that should not have gotten away with for so long (and made a lot of money from it)…
 
awesome, Take control talented young people, its your future, we can only hope :)
 
False flag attacks by secret government agents intent to scare the sheeple into believing we all need new and draconian legislation to protect us. OR Bunch of kids with some denial of service hacker tools which is scaring the sheeple into believing we need draconian legislation to protect us.
 
Next time, they will launch assault against the United States’ government, transportation, and economy by collective computer hackers. Any and all computer-based systems are the objective and would destroy the modern day life of America. As seen in the 2007 movie “Live Free or Die Hard” or Die Hard 4.. :D
 
I was under the impression that mega upload/download are pretty quick in general to remove content that it deemed pirated/copyright infringment.

At the end of the day the site was set up as "public" file hosting, and as such those incharge can only do so much to control what content is uploaded.

The closest analogy I can think of is if a criminal used a safe deposit boxes to store stolen goods or evidence from a murder, would it then be fair to charge the bank with theft/ handling stolen goods or charge them as an accessory?
 
"The closest analogy I can think of is if a criminal used a safe deposit boxes to store stolen goods or evidence from a murder, would it then be fair to charge the bank with theft/ handling stolen goods or charge them as an accessory? "

They are looking in to paypal at the moment for knowingly handling money from the proceeds of crime......
 
"DDoS attacks likened to the virtual equivalent of a nuclear bomb "

In what F***ing way is this like a nuclear bomb going off????? Ile tell u this one 20 Megaton device detonated at 1000f above Washington DC and planet Earth would be a whole lot less corrupt. Kind of like surgically removing a tumor, well maybe not surgically but to the benefit of humanity to be sure! America already police the world, LEAVE OUR NET THE F**K ALONE!!!
 
I *want* to like Anonymous but I just can't because they aren't serious enough. You can tell by their actions that they are fairly young, probably slightly immature, group of people. These DDoS attacks are like a few mosquitoes that keep flying around your head; they're annoying and that's about it.

If you want to be taken seriously you need to do something like what Julian Assange and Wikileaks are doing. But then again, for lack of a better phrase, that takes some real balls to do.

It's actually getting tiring seeing Anonymous referred to as "hackers" when 90% (made up figure) of what they do is just DDoS attacks. I'm pretty sure the closest they came to being hackers was the Aaron Barr fiasco.
 
Leeky said:
I didn't mean to get rough. You can pass this all off if you don't consider that to be your job, or consider yourself a journalist. Maybe that is the case.

I do not feel I have caused any misinterpretation in this article, though in hindsight it is a little more "opinionated" than coverage I normally write.

I'll take your comments into consideration when writing future news coverage. Once again thank you for the feedback.

Just add an Op/Ed tag or even possible an Op/Ed section and then tag/file it under that. Problem solved.

I enjoyed reading your article, including the parts I found opinionated.
 
@ justgivemeaname.
I think your missing the point of that guests post as well. Anonymous did those DDoS attacks, not because they were trying to protest the arrests, they did it because they didnt agree with the arrest. Even if they did read the paperwork on the arrest all they did was bomb a few websites for a few hours and TEMPORARLY shut them down. Thats like running into a little kid throwing a temper tantrum because mommy didnt buy their favorite cereal. The child disagrees with the parents decision, child throws tantrum. Anonymous did pretty much the same thing.
I do want to like the rebelous nature of Anonymous, I just feel their actions are less then honest. What are they trying to protest? What are they trying to protect? They have no true north. They are just "bandwagoning" whats hot and news worthy. I want to see them become more serious in both their actions and responses. If they wanted to protest the arrests, they should have shutdown those websites on a more permanent basis. Hold the website "hostage" till their demands are met
 
@ justgivemeaname.
...[ ].... Anonymous did those DDoS attacks, not because they were trying to protest the arrests, they did it because they didnt agree with the arrest....[ ]...
That's exactly what this thread needed, somebody's bull s*** semantic interpretation of their motives...
 
captaincranky said:
@ justgivemeaname.
...[ ].... Anonymous did those DDoS attacks, not because they were trying to protest the arrests, they did it because they didnt agree with the arrest....[ ]...
That's exactly what this thread needed, somebody's bull s*** semantic interpretation of their motives...

Uh oh - where'd you come from, cap'n? I was just about to post a completely unqualified, unsupported opinion, too. I better hold off now. Nuts. :)
 
All I know is they are doing what they believe is right, not what some lobbyist told them too.
 
Guest said:
I was under the impression that mega upload/download are pretty quick in general to remove content that it deemed pirated/copyright infringment.

At the end of the day the site was set up as "public" file hosting, and as such those incharge can only do so much to control what content is uploaded.

The closest analogy I can think of is if a criminal used a safe deposit boxes to store stolen goods or evidence from a murder, would it then be fair to charge the bank with theft/ handling stolen goods or charge them as an accessory?
You should read the indictment they were served for more details (can be found in the comments of the TechSpot story about the arrest)…
 
Back