Also you don't just have one bullet coming at cqb ranges; chances of multiple impacts increase plate breaking chance; even sapi plates can only sustain a few rounds of 7.62 at best.Let's settle this!
Also you don't just have one bullet coming at cqb ranges; chances of multiple impacts increase plate breaking chance; even sapi plates can only sustain a few rounds of 7.62 at best.Let's settle this!
No citizen got this weapon, it was very helpful, but it was military forces who received it.And yet, when Russia invaded Ukraine, one of the Biden's first moves was to send the citizens of that country thousands of rifles, pistols, and shotguns, along with 20 million rounds of small-arms ammunition -- all of it for weapons substantially less powerful than "a bazooka". According to Kiev, it was extremely helpful.
That's why you aim for the face.If they have level 4 body armor it will stop anything less than .50 cal. Or maybe .338 Lapua.
Wrong. Velocity defeats body armor and level 4 plates can be defeated by 5.56 moving at ~3000 fps. Full power rounds out of an 16-18" barrel can easily achieve this. Additionally, plates only cover vital organs from a straight on shot and don't protect against other areas that can easily kill you. Body armor isn't some magic shield that will protect you for all lethal injury and even if it manages to stop a faster moving round, there will be a large amount of back face deformation that can still temporarily incapacitate you and leave you vulnerable to follow up fire.If they have level 4 body armor it will stop anything less than .50 cal. Or maybe .338 Lapua.
Yeah... this is why firearms really need to be illegal for private citizens - and the reason why cops are so trigger happy in the first place. Even with an entire arsenal at your disposal (which sadly, in the US is actually legal to obtain), the police, if you somehow defeat them, will simply call reinforcements.
The antiquated "I need guns in case the King of England invades" really no longer applies - if a foreign army actually does invade the US, your bazooka won't help...
That has very little to do with the legality of firearms….Tell me how Afghanistan went again?
Let me tell you if they came in my home they have a bullet waiting
.. they will give you 100 in return, without question, tough guy.Let me tell you if they came in my home they have a bullet waiting
And who says the poster's property does not have layered and lethal defense......thats why I said bullet. who says my family is unarmed?
I was extremely tempted to ask them to try it and let us know in advance so we can pop some corn before we turn on the news, but then thought better of it due to their questionable decision making skills.Ah the gun-toting "I'm invincible cause I have my gun I'm totin'' crowd just doesn't realize that they would be torn to shreds even if they were able to take down a few cops. Cops have radios and there would be an unstoppable force on the way. Just ask the Bundys about that.
But feel free to try the **** you're talking if this ever happens to you. I assure you, there's a Darwin Award waiting for you if you do.
Not only is that not true --ordinary citizens were indeed armed in Ukraine and told to repel invaders -- but it misses the fact that it neatly illustrates the lie in the original post. You claimed these small arms were "useless" in modern warfare, when the facts are quite the opposite.No citizen got this weapon, it was very helpful, but it was military forces who received it.
And that is correct way of use - trained personnel using it in a conflict.
Did you even read the article? The information Apple supplied law enforcement was correct. The issue was that the location of the stolen device did not imply the location of the perpetrator.Apple does it again! Of course you would think law enforcement would be smart enough to double and triple check ANY information they get from their phones, internet, etc, etc ....
Again, they weren't handled just to civilians, only to paramilitary groups under the army command. Volunteers, sure, but still munition were tracked and distributed to designated quickly created units. And while initial stages of invasion were very chaotic, there were never free distribution of arms to ordinary civilians.Not only is that not true --ordinary citizens were indeed armed in Ukraine and told to repel invaders -- but it misses the fact that it neatly illustrates the lie in the original post. You claimed these small arms were "useless" in modern warfare, when the facts are quite the opposite.
That has very little to do with the legality of firearms….
And I stand by that - Afghanistan is a completely different kettle of fish… terrain, armed forces, political climate - all are VASTLY different."The antiquated "I need guns in case the King of England invades" really no longer applies - if a foreign army actually does invade the US, your bazooka won't help..."
You've got nothing to stand on. If anything, the invading army would have an exponentially harder time given the greater availability of arms, training, and very large number of retired military personnel in the civillian population.And I stand by that - Afghanistan is a completely different kettle of fish… terrain, armed forces, political climate - all are VASTLY different.
Not my point - my point is that it’s apples and oranges… and who’s invading the US?!? Canada? Mexico?You've got nothing to stand on. If anything, the invading army would have an exponentially harder time given the greater availability of arms, training, and very large number of retired military personnel in the civillian population.
Wrong again!Again, they weren't handled just to civilians, only to paramilitary groups under the army command. ... tere were never free distribution of arms to ordinary civilians.
Reading is not your strong suit, amirite?Wrong again!
Politico, Mar 11, 2022: Zelenskyy is arming Kyiv residents .... the government has promised to give a gun to any Ukrainian civilian who wants one..."
![]()
Zelenskyy is arming Kyiv residents — a former rival is helping supply the rest
Just days ago, Serhiy Prytula was planning to launch a political party to challenge the Ukrainian president. ‘That was another life,’ he says now.www.politico.eu
One can quickly find thousands of similar references.
But this is America. If you dont use overwhelming unnecessary force, its considered woke.1) I do not think the definition of "peace" means what they think it means
2) the husband and children were sleeping inside a truck, perhaps talking to him to gather more information would have been helpful
3) it took them half an hour to realize the dodge charger was not on the property?
4)why do you need a SWAT team to recover a stolen vehicle? Even if "weapons" are used in the car jacking, the minute you see children are involved the situation has to deescalate and perhaps not go into the house ramming the front door down.
But this is America. If you dont use overwhelming unnecessary force, its considered woke.
They really need to have some evidence other than "find my" said it was at this address...
You only need SWAT once you're CERTAIN that there are armed criminals inside a residence.
Yeah... this is why firearms really need to be illegal for private citizens - and the reason why cops are so trigger happy in the first place. Even with an entire arsenal at your disposal (which sadly, in the US is actually legal to obtain), the police, if you somehow defeat them, will simply call reinforcements.
The antiquated "I need guns in case the King of England invades" really no longer applies - if a foreign army actually does invade the US, your bazooka won't help...