I believe the pot is calling the kettle black... wahoo, you run a read-only OS that can’t actually do anything the average user would want... please explain how this is relevant to the thread?WoW dude....
Troll much?
I believe the pot is calling the kettle black... wahoo, you run a read-only OS that can’t actually do anything the average user would want... please explain how this is relevant to the thread?WoW dude....
Troll much?
Who cares if it doesn't do anything YOU want it to do?I believe the pot is calling the kettle black... wahoo, you run a read-only OS that can’t actually do anything the average user would want... please explain how this is relevant to the thread?
Again... irrelevant... I'd wager you could run Windows XP on an M1 Macbook and it would probably outperform your Sandy-Bridge dinosaur...Who cares if it doesn't do anything YOU want it to do?
It does EVERYTHING I need it to do!
So what if the average user only requires a locked down, walled garden, malware infected spyware platform?
My need are much more refined!
Sounds like a bet!Again... irrelevant... I'd wager you could run Windows XP on an M1 Macbook and it would probably outperform your Sandy-Bridge dinosaur...
This is the second article (and I’m sure there’s more) where I’ve seen you comment with frankly unbelievable claims comprising a bizarre mixture of conspiracy theory and two-decades-out-of-date marketing spiel for Windows XP. Like, what’s the deal?
I disagree. What professional does not need better batrery life?
You have now entered the Apple reality zone where the truth is what they tell you and anything else is a lie.Apple M1 beats AMD 64 core Milan in multithreaded workloads. Heard it here first.........
I agree with Linus Sebastian in that when I watched the launch video for this my BS meter was at defcon5 levels. I kept thinking, 'yeah, but it's Apple, so whats the catch, because its in there somewhere'. I also liked how he called them on their marketing slide that just said 'the competition' with a blue bar signifying Intel, which really didn't get much better when they added 'i3' to the bottom, in a footnote no less, after the fact to boot. Not even specifying which one. Nehalem maybe? NetBurst? Did they have I series then?
They did a great job on this, all things considered, but their marketing on this was so 'spun' and skewed I got dizzy watching it. In fact, it has made the opposite to its intent happen with me, it made me so overly skeptical from the used car salesman vibe I got that it's hard for me to acknowledge what really does make it good. Still looking for that catch though, it is Apple after all....
You can level the same type of claims against almost all companies. Marketing and reality rarely agree on anything. This of course applies to Apple, Intel, ARM, AMD and Nvidia. That's why independent reviews are so important. There are plenty of independent tests which show how much faster the new M1 chips are compared to Intel powered Mac's... using real world programs rather than just artificial benchmarks. Considering this is really early days for Apple silicon, it does seem rather impressive. My only experience with Mac's is retro 68K and PPC, and even that is limited. I do have a 3rd gen iPod, but iTunes on Windows is awful.You have now entered the Apple reality zone where the truth is what they tell you and anything else is a lie.