What do Americans say about their country?... wait... oh yes, I got it, the Greatest Country in the World! Haha, yeah right, ok bye, going back to streaming on my modest, per UK standards that is, 300MB/s ;-P
Yeah, you dont have 300MB/s, you have 300Mbps, big difference.What do Americans say about their country?... wait... oh yes, I got it, the Greatest Country in the World! Haha, yeah right, ok bye, going back to streaming on my modest, per UK standards that is, 300MB/s ;-P
You dont have 1GB/s, you have 1Gbps. Its not that hard to understand difference between Gigabyte and GigabitYou forget. The USA is a far far FAR larger country then the UK. Some places the internet connections suck others it does not. I live on the east coast pay $77 a month for 1GBS down 50MPS up. Does that mean all of the UK sucks because I happen to have a faster internet connection? No of course not.
I know it's big, like, it's the US. And no, that's not my actual speedDoes Spain span across as much land as USA does? Does it have 300+ million residents?
No.
So, I am sorry for directing this at you, it's meant for everyone claiming greatness of their country's internet connection. While actually stating your personal plan speeds, most of you have no idea what rural parts, or just other parts of your country can have, have or will never have.You have no idea if your provider would install fiber infrastructure for a small community in which not everybody would even subscribe to it.
Personally I have 130/10mbit cable connection. I could get fiber, but the speeds are similar (up to "whole" 300mbit) and costs much more. A lot of people have faster connections, but even more (much more) do not. I am not going to go and say "my country has 300mbit fiber" because it's not completely true. Only ~20% of the country can apply, and even less will get it.
The web browser was invented at CERN. The internet was a DARPA project. Actually do some research before spouting off about things of which you are apparently ignorant.At, so that's why internet is so limited in US - you are even further from Switzerland where it was invented. Case closed![]()
Nope. Both were private entities to begin with. It was only later that the gov't got involved and costs went up, service went down.Power and phone where ran on the government's dime who then sold those lines to the utility companies
What do Americans say about their country?... wait... oh yes, I got it, the Greatest Country in the World! Haha, yeah right, ok bye, going back to streaming on my modest, per UK standards that is, 300MB/s ;-P
The web browser was invented at CERN. The internet was a DARPA project. Actually do some research before spouting off about things of which you are apparently ignorant.
Uuuh...am I supposed to believe they don't have cable where this guy lives? Cable has gigabit service practically everywhere now. But then again, big telecom outfits will fight tooth and nail to even keep competitors out even in areas they don't bother to serve!
I have friends who live in the boonies, miles from the nearest cable internet..but they have fast DSL. Why? Because Verizon finally sold off their control of the landline infrastructure allowing a new company to actually provide "last mile" solutions. Even so, progress has been glacial to actually get service to most of the rural areas - the company that filled Verizon's void is completely mismanaged and hasn't met any of its commitments. Several local governments finally got impatient and got the state to allow the new infrastructure provider to allow competitors to use their lines, and in no time at all you had acceptable DSL running into areas that would still be stuck with dial-up or overpriced wireless Internet. Small companies can take advantage of federal grants allowing them to still make a profit on providing service to areas beyond city limits. This is one form of socialism that actually makes sense.
Nope. Both were private entities to begin with. It was only later that the gov't got involved and costs went up, service went down.
Those laws, in many places, are at least a century old, and were intended to protect telephone companies, not ISPs. Those laws, too, are being abused by the ISPs. Unfortunately, this is why government needs to be involved - by removing these asinine laws from the equation so that consumers, in the US, get a fair shake at competition.you have states which pride themselves on independence from other states. you can run wires or fiber to those places, it's just that without government intervention it will never happen and the ISPs paid for laws that prevent that. regional monopolies defended by laws... so stupid.
To. Begin. With.Not in rural areas, my grandmother's town got power when the roosevelt administration setup power lines during the depression , she didn't have electricity until 37 or 38 same with phones
I've actually written on the topic, but since you are a know-it-all the effort is wasted on you. Short version - ARPANET established TCP/IP protocols in late 1969, part of the US defense dept.I did, and protocols defining internet we know today, came from CERN, developed for their use by few of the employees so they, employees, can get faster and easier access to data.
You can also do some research. US likes to steal than brag with portions of other people's breakthrough. Like it brags they invented nuclear fission and the bomb, not the Jew imported to US to do that.
Don't be too proud of yourself because, well, let's see... The telephone was invented in Canada by someone who is Scottish-born (so UK) which formed the original backbone framework for the internet. That means the UK and Canada both had a hand in the creation of internet because the telephone and telegraph were every bit as revolutionary then as the internet is now. They literally changed the world.Enjoy those high taxes for a service your country did not invent.
In Canada, what happened is that Bell and the cable providers were regulated monopolies. That means the Federal Government has control of the original hardware backbone networks. As a result, companies like Bell, Rogers and Shaw have no choice but to not only allow third-party ISPs to use that same network (that the government built) but to actively enable it. My third-party DSL setup was done by an actual Bell Canada technician.Uuuh...am I supposed to believe they don't have cable where this guy lives? Cable has gigabit service practically everywhere now. But then again, big telecom outfits will fight tooth and nail to even keep competitors out even in areas they don't bother to serve!
I have friends who live in the boonies, miles from the nearest cable internet..but they have fast DSL. Why? Because Verizon finally sold off their control of the landline infrastructure allowing a new company to actually provide "last mile" solutions. Even so, progress has been glacial to actually get service to most of the rural areas - the company that filled Verizon's void is completely mismanaged and hasn't met any of its commitments. Several local governments finally got impatient and got the state to allow the new infrastructure provider to allow competitors to use their lines, and in no time at all you had acceptable DSL running into areas that would still be stuck with dial-up or overpriced wireless Internet. Small companies can take advantage of federal grants allowing them to still make a profit on providing service to areas beyond city limits. This is one form of socialism that actually makes sense.
The internet was invented here in the USA. Google it.At, so that's why internet is so limited in US - you are even further from Switzerland where it was invented. Case closed![]()