I still say the sex offenders can be labeled as such for petty incidences. The incidences may not even be true just believable. I could never stand behind such restrictions as long as there is only one classification for sex offenders. When people see the term sex offender they visualize the worst, because there is no differentiation between offenses. Here they are trying to restrict the worst cases but yet its all of them that would pay regardless of the offense they committed or was accused of.
Indeed. Perhaps me, and many of my contemporaries would have never made it out of the 60's and 70's without lengthy criminal records.
We like to think we're "enlightened", but the US Supreme Court didn't officially end anti-sodomy laws until 1993.
So, that means the pretty much any male over 40, who is now petitioning for "gay rights", and "gay marriage", should have "sex offender" tacked onto his criminal jacket.
Also keep in mind, that depending on jurisdiction, adultery and sex out of wedlock were at one time felonies.
And then we currently have "age of consent issues", that overeager prosecutors trying to make a name for themselves are pursuing. Not to mention minors "sexting" being prosecuted as "adult child pornographers". That means every boy currently dating his slightly younger high school sweetheart, has to stop having sex with her, the minute he turns 18, or faces having "sex offender" tacked onto his criminal jacket. And keep clean undies on girls, you never know when you'll wind up on somebody's iPhone.
So straighten up kids, the only things left for you to do are; abandon any sexual contact with others, take up masturbating with great vigor and determination, and give all your money to the Apple corporation.
If you buy online, you can masturbate emphatically while you're making the purchase (*). Have yourselves a nice day, and a better "Applegasm".
(*) Whoops! It seems I may have accidentally stumbled onto the reason Apple product owners act the way they do...
