If Apple included a power brick I never would have used it because I have a USBC 100W GaN Charger. Works perfectly.
If Brazil has a problem, Apple needs to hire me to properly “file” their grievances.
You clearly didn't read my post before posting a response. My post had nothing to do with demanding they include a charger. It has everything to do with Apple making a claim they are saving the environment by not including a charger saying people would have chargers from a previous phone purchase, but Apple includes a cable not compatible with previous chargers while selling one that is. Also the claims the reduced packaging saves the environment doesn't take into account the packaging from buying a seperate charger which is 40%- 50% more materials than making the phone box slightly larger for those people who would buy a charger anyway.
You bought a new charger because you wanted to use fast charging which is exactly what Apple wanted you to do, but that new charger comes with extra packing and since you didn't use their old chargers that removes the whole "we saved the environment by not including a charger" excuse.
Apple just needs to be honest. They are not saving the environment by not including chargers, since they are still manufacturing them and they aren't passing any of their savings to the customer. That's what this fine is about. An additional charger, bought separately will have additional packaging and if bought online will have to be packed in another box and then shipped separately increasing the impact on the environment even more than just putting a charger in the original box.
"Apple needs to hire me to properly “file” their grievances." What are you going to do? You don't know how to do research or use critical thinking. The reason Apple has been given a fine isn't even a slap on the wrist. $2 million for Apple is like $2 to most people.
Here is the part of the article where Procon-SP worked with Apple to get answers to their questions, but Apple stopped cooperating:
"Last November, Procon-SP announced that they were investigating Apple’s decision to remove the charger. But midway through their investigation, Apple reportedly stopped responding to requests for information. Procon-SP weren't able to get clear answers to their key queries, which sought to determine if Apple passed on their cost savings to the consumer, and if Apple slowed charger production. Without a response, the agency was forced to reach a guilty verdict."
From the 9to5Mac article:
"Now,
Procon says that Apple didn’t respond when asked if the iPhone 12’s price was reduced after removing the charger, what’s the price of the iPhone with and without the charger, and if it reduced the number of chargers produced." Seems like simple and fair questions to me, but Apple wasn't about to admit they charge the same amount or more and they still made had just as many phone chargers as they would have.
And just like another poster said if Apple really cared about the environment they would have given people the option to have a charger and a cable or not.