Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 reveal trailer released
- Thread starter Emil
- Start date
princeton
Posts: 1,674 +1
Obvious troll is obvious. Crysis 2 looks mediocre. Not CoD awful(seewhutididthar?) but it was pretty bad.
Yah doing the recycling is pretty intense huh?
princeton
Posts: 1,674 +1
red1776 said:
I saw...
Hey don't one-up my smart-assery....:stickout:I still have the bad taste of Cervat....or it might be this $12.00 Shiraz.
Meh. I knew from the minute they announced that xbox 360 MMO(Just like the Crysis 2 demo I was universally flamed) that it would be the end of great crytek games.
red1776
Posts: 5,124 +194
The problem is:
1) I think your correct..
2) I think the entire industry is watching Crytek/EA's little stunt to see if it will fly (port everything) and it may be the beginning of the end of Great/good/decent PC games period. Xbox and 3-D glasses, and that will be about it.
IAMTHESTIG
Posts: 1,868 +902
Yeah its the same as previous games... appears to be the same engine and a lot of the same models and textures. No way in hell i'm paying $50 - 60 for an "expansion pack" which is kind of what it really is.
I've never been a big fan of CoD and this isn't helping it. The games have always been the same old boring action action action, no time to think or use strategy. The same boring, linear gameplay. I prefer sandbox games... but I know most people prefer the linear, set story gameplay. Hence why they sell so many copies of this game.
Everyone is a robot.
I've never been a big fan of CoD and this isn't helping it. The games have always been the same old boring action action action, no time to think or use strategy. The same boring, linear gameplay. I prefer sandbox games... but I know most people prefer the linear, set story gameplay. Hence why they sell so many copies of this game.
Everyone is a robot.
fpsgamerJR62
Posts: 489 +0
That's a nice action-packed trailer, like something out of a Jerry Bruckheimer / Michael Bay movie. Crappy game or not, come November 2011, I bet they'll sell another zillion copies of this latest COD sequel. For me, I treat each Call of Duty game like an interactive action movie which is the best way to enjoy this type of game. When I want the realistic military stuff, I break out my copy of ARMA 2. If you have the patience and can live the bugs and wonky AI of BI's creations such as ARMA, ARMA 2 and the coming ARMA 3, then you'll be rewarded with a game play experience that COD, in its present form, cannot give you.
princeton
Posts: 1,674 +1
I'll never give up PC gaming. Someone on the EA forum made a great analogy about game development for PC/console. Check out the post.
http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/l...nid=0D93DF9E93E71E2FD75EDB5991BDB466#12321754
This is completely correct. The only excuse is lack of talent in the artistic department of a studio and or laziness when it comes to texture and model work.
princeton
Posts: 1,674 +1
To be honest I predict a video game market crash in the future, just like in 1983. The 1983 crash was mostly due to over saturation of poor quality rushed games resulting in a loss of consumer trust.
Now I know many of the *****s on consoles will still buy MW3 like sheep, but soon consumers are going to stop buying because games like Crysis 2 and any of the past three CoD games have left a bad taste behind.
Now I know many of the *****s on consoles will still buy MW3 like sheep, but soon consumers are going to stop buying because games like Crysis 2 and any of the past three CoD games have left a bad taste behind.
example1013
Posts: 263 +0
Black Ops is only a bit different than MW2, because the Black Ops engine is a modified WaW engine (which was a modified CoD 4 engine) while MW2 was a modified CoD 4 engine itself. MW3 is likely a modded MW2 engine, so now we've basically got 2 CoD 4 engine mods, one for Treyarch and one for IW.
Also, I'm not going to say anything about Black Ops' poly count. If anything, it should've been lower, because that game breaks to sub-30 FPS on a console with just a napalm strike. Honestly the Black Ops engine isn't all that great since it can't even handle the multiplayer (nevermind the awful netcode) on a console.
MW3 looks like the engine will be different, but I think they've been working on physics modifications, rather than graphical ones. Which I'm fine with, to be honest. Looking pretty is great, but I don't require it as long as the game looks decent. And honestly, I'd rather just have it be really playable, which Black Ops is not.
Unfortunately most people who play MW3 won't even be able to take advantage of better textures and higher polys, because PC gaming is starting to become sort of a niche due to the barrier of entry that is the cost of purchasing a gaming rig. It's why they don't put Crysis graphics in CoD games--no one's going to see them!
Honestly, though, the whole thing is going to need a new engine soon. The entire MW line of games is running on essentially Quake 3 right now, and it'll only last for so much longer.
This is the first time where I am more excited to play a Battlefield game than a Modern Warfare game. Battlefield 3 seems more realistic and dramatic than the new MW3. I hope the new MW team is up to the task, but I can at least say graphically Battlefield 3 has this game whipped.
example1013
Posts: 263 +0
How can you say that when you haven't seen a single frame of battlefield 3 on a realistic machine?
I'm not arguing that BF3 won't likely have amazing graphics, since it's likely going to be PC-optimized (also MW has **** textures regardless of anything else), but we still haven't gotten to see what it looks like on even a top-range gaming PC. The gameplay footage has been recorded on a $6000 workstation, which nobody here has, I'd imagine.
I know this is primarily a PC board, but I was referring to the console versions, but I think PC-wise the comparison still holds. When Game Informer had their exclusive first look at Battlefield 3 I was thoroughly impressed and those were still pictures. When I saw the "Faultline" trailer, I knew the pictures didn't do the game justice. The lighting, poly count, and frame-rate is impressive. Compared to the "Reveal" MW3 trailer, Battlefield 3 is years ahead. Also, as Princeton said, the Battlefield 3 was demoed on a capable PC. At the beginning of the "Faultline" trailer it states it is actual in-game footage.
example1013
Posts: 263 +0
There must be a BF3 trailer I didn't see.
G
Guest
PC gamers are always trash talking console gamers. It just goes to show how big their self esteem is.
G
Guest
First of all whoever said Crysis 2 graphics were good, they suck in comparison to previous Crysis games. The game was an obvious port from console to PC which completely ruined the graphics. Graphics really shouldn't be in discussion anyways, we're taking about console games from 5 year old consoles running 5 year old hardware.
Do you still have the same laptop from 5 years ago? Why would you have the same gaming platform? Technology gets updated, unless you're a console gamer.
Do you still have the same laptop from 5 years ago? Why would you have the same gaming platform? Technology gets updated, unless you're a console gamer.
example1013
Posts: 263 +0
To be fair, console technology gets updated too. Console updates happen much less frequency, and for a much lower premium.
princeton
Posts: 1,674 +1
Then you have bad eyes and you should probably have them examined. Look at the hands for ****s sake. Literally at the beginning of the video you already see recycled textures and models.
G
Guest
u guys dont know what u r talking about
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
AI Agents Explained: The Next Evolution in Artificial Intelligence- ITH School replied
