pcaceit said:
So what is the Command/Syntax/Process called for executing the recovery process when you replace a failed member?
If the drive is hot-swappable, usually nothing has to be done. You remove the failing drive and insert the replacement drive. The controller will automatically add the drive to the array. Using the parity information stored on the other two or more working drives, the controller will rebuild the data accordingly. This process takes at least a few hours usually. For non HSCs, it may be necessary to enter the controller setup utility, but this utility is usually menu driven.
I'm unfamiliar with software-based RAID 5 (Under Linux) for example, so I'm unsure what commands you'd use. But you could probably get more details by brining up the man page for the RAID utility: man raid
Windows Server has software RAID 5 as well. You can rebuild an array using Disk Manager through the GUI (Start / Run / diskmgmt.msc )
and if recovery tools can recover the data on the other Disks in the set, will michelle2 be able to get back the data when the failed member is replaced?
RAID 5 is designed to still work while one drive has failed. One failed RAID member should be more of a nuissance in RAID 5 than an actual emergency and since this is the case, (thankfully) Michelle's data should be completely accessible at the software level. There is the
potential to recover all of Michelle's data with only two drives, although the third one should definitely be replaced.
and is the initialize process the process that initialiy implements the RAID operation?
'Initialize' can mean two things... A quick partition removal or a more thorough, unconditional format. In both cases, it prepares the RAID array for use. If Michelle performed a quick initialization, regular partition recovery utilities should be able to get her data back... And quite completely. My personal favorite is
Active@Partition Recovery, because I've used it many times and it has worked so many times for me. I've never used this program on a RAID array though, so I don't know if there will be complications. It's a free download (to try, at least!)... So you can find out if will work or not before you commit to purchasing it (it's inexpensive). There may also be newer, better tools out there... Not sure.
If the array has been initialized unconditionally (would have taken a long, long time to initialize), then Michelle has gotten herself into quite a pickle. Her data will be substantially more difficult to recover... There IS software out there that can get
some of the data back, but I've been largely unsuccessful attempting such recovery. It would seem attempting recovery at the software level (after an unconditional format) is only useful when you just have a few documents or pictures you want back. If you want your whole directory structure back with large files etc... I would deem it unlikely. These data forensic programs are very expensive as well, such as
Ontrack's data recovery suite which apparently now runs at $1500 or so. :\ I remember when it used to be
only $900....
and could you just create volumes of equal size on each Disk to make up the array and have the unused space available for other purposes?
Not that I'm aware of, but I know what you're thinking of. The controller will use the smallest drive as the size of the volumes, so larger disks will have unused storage capacity. You would think the left over space would be partitionable, but I don't think it is (However, I don't know this for sure).
BUT, even if it is partitionable, I believe this would be a very improper setup anyhow, as RAID 5 is usually hot-swappable and if you have miscellaneous partitions on a couple of the disks, things could get very messy during an emergency.
