B
Care to join the fray?The butthurt is real in these comments lol.
Yeah. Although Musk's philosophy is simply keeping his face in the news at all costs. And when I say costs, those are always absorbed by someone else.I agree with Musk's philosophy. You need to be optimistic and ambitious. Also, he first sets a nearly impossible goal, and then works towards it. You may think of this as foolish, but this is actually the correct way to deal with projects.
And BTW, all that s*** about Musk not taking taxpayer money, is exactly that. Space-X only contracts, (I believe), are with the government. Where the hell do you think that money comes from, it not the taxpayers?
That would make me pretty much entirely correct, thus far.Cranky, with regards to who Spacex is building their rockets for, 10 of their 21 successful launches have been for private corporations, and their launch manifest for the year ahead has 18 launches scheduled and only 2 of them are US Government launches. They did blow up a ISS resupply mission so their total so far is 1 private and 12 public launches,
If it's all then same to you, I'm going to wait until any of that happens to say I'm wrong. And even if it does, I'n not wrong NOW. Them's public fundsbut by the end of 2016 it will 26 private and 14 public launches. The majority of their money will be coming from corporations paying to get their satellites into orbit not government contracts.
Oh look, you worded exactly what I said, differently. I'd also so it's a pretty cheap 'n dirty way of getting all that free attention and your face plastered all over the news, by getting one "costume" made.And the "space suit" won't work the way it is rendered but Spacex got free advertising and they aren't going to turn that down.
But then again they are talking about going to Mars, so their best interest in off the table to begin with.Certainly not in the best interests of the crews ....
Well, ya better stuff a couple pairs of long johns under that bold fashion statement, cause it gets mighty durn cold on Mars: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_of_MarsWhile "space suit" is not very accurate, this is exactly the kind of suit people are working on for the surface of Mars.
They're using form fitting and elasticized panels to provide pressure on the body in near vacuum conditions rather than the current bulky space suits.
The NASA suit looks very very similar. Soooo yeah. How many rockets has Nasa launched lately? Riiiight, Elon Musk does it for them.NASA is in the process of creating a trimmed down suit that allows greater flexibility and less bulk, but they are years away from deployment. No doubt that Musk is an innovator, but this looks a bit too much like sacrificing safety for appearance. Certainly not in the best interests of the crews ....
Musk is a big, arrogant arse hole with a BIGGER mouth and a lot of money so people think he's great.
This is the biggest piece of **** I have ever seen. It will never work in space. He's like a giant and stupid child.
Yeah. Although Musk's philosophy is simply keeping his face in the news at all costs. And when I say costs, those are always absorbed by someone else.
Here we have a piece of crap which panders to Musk's super sized, super hero ego, can't possibly contain enough of any current insulation for doing work on Mars, and we haven't yet gotten to the part about lacking the necessary radiation protection.
But you know what, it doesn't seen to have cost him anything. After all, "he's taking bids to see who he'll "allow" to produce it">
And BTW, all that s*** about Musk not taking taxpayer money, is exactly that. Space-X only contracts, (I believe), are with the government. Where the hell do you think that money comes from, it not the taxpayers?
I do not know Musk personally, and I've never seen him speak, so I have no idea what kind of person he is. But you should keep in mind that he is a business man that does what any sane business man does. It seems that the fact that he is rich clouds your judgement.
I'm not an American, so I have no idea about taxpayer money shizzle. What I've heard is, that Musk could bring goods into space for much less than the original organizations that the U.S. government and NASA had contracts with, so I really don't know what you try to say.
Also, the photo is merely speculation, so don't draw any conclusions. Even if this suit is what the designer made, then they still need to change it a lot (I thought this was obvious) to make it actually suitable for space/mars. But this way they can set a goal, like, ideally we would want the spacesuit to look like this. Above all, just because you don't think such a slim suit is possible, doesn't mean that future technology can actually allow this. I mean, think of all the other things that have become very slim (the very monitor you are staring at right now, for instance).
Here I thought Americans were ambitious by nature, striving to achieve the impossible, trying to make science fiction come true, no matter how ridiculous. But the comments here make me have serious doubts about thatBig disappointment..
See, this is why I'm continually complaining about CEO's in general. For example, how many CPU's do you think the CEO of Intel has personally developed the design for, drawn the schematics to, or was actually involved in growing the chips? Well, none.I'm sorry how many companies are you CEO of? How many rockets have you launched into space then landed?
I agree with Musk's philosophy. You need to be optimistic and ambitious. Also, he first sets a nearly impossible goal, and then works towards it. You may think of this as foolish, but this is actually the correct way to deal with projects.
I'm sorry how many companies are you CEO of? How many rockets have you launched into space then landed?
Well thus far, it has largely been tax credits, loans, and taxpayer money that "a millionaire" has been spending. So, IMHO, we do get a say.To the date still people don't know how to multi quote and complain about how a millionare spends his money... lol
Dude, because Musk is your hero, in no way obligates us to make him ours. So off the top of my head, I'd say both sides are pretty much dead on topic.Stop with the rage guys, you are not building towards the topic
Well thus far, it has largely been tax credits, loans, and taxpayer money that "a millionaire" has been spending. So, IMHO, we do get a say.
Dude, because Musk is your hero, in no way obligates us to make him ours. So off the top of my head, I'd say both sides are pretty much dead on topic.
BTW, I do know how to "multi-quote". In fact, I'm practically a "visionary" at it (*). Why, I practically invented it. A few nights ago I dreamed about a universe where multi-quoting was all the rage. Now excuse me, while I go hold a press conference about it. I'm going to introduce the "Crank-o-Matic Multi-Quote Typewriter", as soon as I get Fisher-Price to do a mock-up I can parade in front of the cameras...(y)
(*) Yo soy "El Salvador del citar multiple", por esos de ustedes que hablan Espanol y esperar a invertir en mi compania.
Useless, I think not:I
The thing is, you are ALL -not just you cranky captain- raging about it with no objective, some people will like him, some don't, whatever you or I or Capitán Citación Múltiple could say -if you type ALT+164 you can get ñ btw- even writting on his "Crank-o-Matic Multi-Quote Typewriter" without "ñ".
So you are just fueling the most useless invention ever created. This is like one of those Goldberg contraptions... we could call it "CaptainCrank-o-Matic".