EV chargers now outnumber gas pumps in California

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 579   +13
Staff
In brief: California is leading the nation's shift to zero-emission vehicles (ZEV), establishing key benchmarks in its efforts to advance clean transportation and infrastructure. With just 11.3 percent of the U.S. population, the state accounts for 30 percent of all new ZEV sales nationwide, according to the California Air Resources Board. It also notes that for two consecutive years, one in four Californians has opted for a zero-emission vehicle over traditional gas-powered models.

The state has also made significant strides in building an expansive electric vehicle charging network. Governor Gavin Newsom recently announced that California now boasts 178,549 public and shared private EV chargers, surpassing the state's approximately 120,000 gasoline nozzles by 48 percent.

Of these chargers, over 162,000 are Level 2 chargers designed for longer charging sessions, while nearly 17,000 are fast chargers capable of quickly replenishing battery levels. Beyond the public infrastructure, the California Energy Commission (CEC) estimates that more than 700,000 Level 2 chargers have been installed in single-family homes across the state.

State agencies have invested heavily in infrastructure improvements, allocating $1.4 billion to expand the country's most extensive EV charging and hydrogen fueling network. This funding supports initiatives like the Fast Charge California Project under CALeVIP, which aims to install fast-charging stations at businesses and public locations statewide. Additionally, thousands of dollars in grants and rebates are available to assist low-income residents in adopting EV technology.

The CEC has improved its tracking methods to ensure chargers are accurately counted and deployed where they are most needed. In 2024 alone, nearly 38,000 new chargers were installed, while an additional 35,554 existing chargers were identified through updated data sources.

Efforts to streamline charger deployment are also underway. State agencies are working to cut red tape and expedite permitting processes for EV chargers while establishing reliability standards and planning for increased grid demand. Attorney General Rob Bonta recently issued a legal alert reminding local governments of their obligations under state law to facilitate charger installations efficiently.

The state's focus on clean transportation is evident in its dominance of the zero-emission vehicle market. In the fourth quarter of 2024 alone, Californians purchased over 108,000 ZEVs, accounting for more than a quarter of all new vehicle sales statewide – a slight increase from the previous year. By the end of 2024, California had surpassed two million ZEVs sold since adoption began.

Permalink to story:

 
Here in Norway I think we have like 10x Ev chargers for every gas nozzle now. It’s gotten to a point where it’s a bit laughable as even libraries, convenience stores etc. has Fast chargers.
 
This is all good news and I look forward to the day when no one needs to spend any time worrying about how / when / where they'll charge their EV.

Meanwhile, I'm sad to see a state government who appears as averse to straightforward talk as any for-profit marketing department. It makes no sense to directly compare a recharging station that can take 4-10 hours to recharge a vehicle to one that can do it in minutes - of course you're going to need a lot more of the former vs. the latter, as evidenced by the admission they are still pushing for rapid installation of many more.

Same with the "zero" in ZEV. I understand the emissions from the power plant are cleaner as compared to coming from a much less sophisticated individual vehicle combustion engine, and again it's a good thing, but why the need to exaggerate an already good situation into a deceptively labelled one?
 
This is all good news and I look forward to the day when no one needs to spend any time worrying about how / when / where they'll charge their EV.

Meanwhile, I'm sad to see a state government who appears as averse to straightforward talk as any for-profit marketing department. It makes no sense to directly compare a recharging station that can take 4-10 hours to recharge a vehicle to one that can do it in minutes - of course you're going to need a lot more of the former vs. the latter, as evidenced by the admission they are still pushing for rapid installation of many more.

Same with the "zero" in ZEV. I understand the emissions from the power plant are cleaner as compared to coming from a much less sophisticated individual vehicle combustion engine, and again it's a good thing, but why the need to exaggerate an already good situation into a deceptively labelled one?
To a person that travels often, it makes total sense to want a five minute recharge. Four hours of driving every 250 miles is not efficient, when it takes four more hours to "fill 'er up".
 
Removing the marketing spin...

In the state with the most "environmentally focused" people and the highest government subsidies bringing down prices, just 25% of people choose EVs over gas.

And CA now has 14% as many fast chargers as gas pumps.
 
Wait wait hold on here! Are you telling me, that if you build the infrastructure,people will buy EVs?

What?!?!?!?!!? No way, how did they ever figure this out?
 
This sounds like a lot, but you've to consider that EVs need charging more frequently and for a longer time than combustion engines (which can be retanked in 5 minutes or less), which means that even a higher number of EV charing stations is able to service less cars in the same time.

Also because the number also includes private chargers, which are only accessible for one or few cars (versus petrol stations, which are rarely non-public, or service at least a relatively large fleet of vehicles), the numbers get even worse, as most of these charging stations have a terrible use/idle ratio. Which makes the number of EV cars serviced even less.

So, the comparison of raw numbers is pretty much pointless, or at least flawed and misleading.
 
This sounds like a lot, but you've to consider that EVs need charging more frequently and for a longer time than combustion engines (which can be retanked in 5 minutes or less), which means that even a higher number of EV charing stations is able to service less cars in the same time.

Also because the number also includes private chargers, which are only accessible for one or few cars (versus petrol stations, which are rarely non-public, or service at least a relatively large fleet of vehicles), the numbers get even worse, as most of these charging stations have a terrible use/idle ratio. Which makes the number of EV cars serviced even less.

So, the comparison of raw numbers is pretty much pointless, or at least flawed and misleading.
In a world where information is a keyboard away, it amazes to see things like this.

Everything that can be whined about is, and yet nobody bothers to mention the obvious facts.
In the US, in just 12–14 years, 63% of the population lives within 2 miles of a charging spot.
And even worse, they never remind you that every EV owner can "retank" at home, every day, with no more involvement than plugging in a cell phone.
They don't have a clue how unnecessary public charging spots are for so many people.
Even a range of 225 miles will last well over a week in normal, everyday life.
Then, park and charge at home.

To a person that travels often, it makes total sense to want a five minute recharge. Four hours of driving every 250 miles is not efficient, when it takes four more hours to "fill 'er up".
See what I mean. Not even mentioning the obvious blunders (like on average, people drive 27 miles a day) even an EV from 2015 can add 100+ miles in 25–30 minutes. And that is from 10 years ago.
 
Last edited:
What is this 4 hour charge claim? You can't sit and charge 4 hours anywhere. Most charge station have a limit of 1 hour of use. My F-150 Lightning has the extended battery and from about 5% to 80% is 20 to 25 minutes charge time depending on the quality of the charge station. This is a non issue with everything except first generation EV's. What is it with the desire to make up crap about EV's? Especially easily refutable claims like this?
 
What is this 4 hour charge claim? You can't sit and charge 4 hours anywhere. Most charge station have a limit of 1 hour of use. My F-150 Lightning has the extended battery and from about 5% to 80% is 20 to 25 minutes charge time depending on the quality of the charge station. This is a non issue with everything except first generation EV's. What is it with the desire to make up crap about EV's? Especially easily refutable claims like this?
Slow chargers works in like parking garages - where you intend to stay for X amount of hours and just want to "top of the battery" before heading out again.
I use a charging spot at the airport when I'm out traveling which allows me to maintain sentry mode when I'm abroad, which is an extra layer of safety if someone provides me with a fender bender
 
In a world where information is a keyboard away, it amazes to see things like this.

Everything that can be whined about is, and yet nobody bothers to mention the obvious facts.
In the US, in just 12–14 years, 63% of the population lives within 2 miles of a charging spot.
And even worse, they never remind you that every EV owner can "retank" at home, every day, with no more involvement than plugging in a cell phone.
They don't have a clue how unnecessary public charging spots are
Even a range of 225 miles will last well over a week in normal, everyday life.
Then, park and charge at home.


See what I mean. Not even mentioning the obvious blunders (like on average, people drive 27 miles a day) even an EV from 2015 can add 100+ miles in 25–30 minutes. And that is from 10 years ago.
A blunder? I used to drive between 375 and 720 miles per day. You assume too much.
 
See what I mean.
Yes, I see. You're hellbent on saying something you think is positive about EVs whenever someone says something you think is negative about them, without being able to address any of the points and facts brough up. We all see it.
 
Here in Norway I think we have like 10x Ev chargers for every gas nozzle now. It’s gotten to a point where it’s a bit laughable as even libraries, convenience stores etc. has Fast chargers.

Same problem with "internet access" in America. We are a bit spread out.
California & Texas land area is about the same size of Norway, and we still have 48 other states!
To build out something like nationwide internet access, EV charging stations, it WILL take a while.
 
Yes, I see. You're hellbent on saying something you think is positive about EVs whenever someone says something you think is negative about them, without being able to address any of the points and facts brough up. We all see it.
Then by all means. What did I miss? Tell me. I will answer back with every bit of researched knowledge I can.
But I really don't often defend EVs so much as I know the truth, so I tell it.
Besides, as someone that goes out and says everything false he can, most of it lies, or ignorant of the facts at best, why would you point the finger?
At least I can prove what I say man. So, just curious.
 
As much as the politically discontent hate Tesla right now, the simple fact is that if Tesla owned 100% of the public chargers we'd actually be in a better situation with EV simply because Tesla's charging network is the best designed and most reliable. I personally use EVgo. I had two years free and using their network has been such a slog that I should write a book about it. It's terrible. It's unreliable. The network is designed so poorly it might as well be a Ponzi Scheme. Electrify America is only marginally better. Tesla however would allow you to do cross country road trips with ease, but for non-Tesla's the fees are so high you might as well have a gas powered car.

We basically need big box mart stores to recognize that if they set up chargers in their parking lots, they'll attract customers they otherwise wouldn't have. Movie theaters, malls, schools, colleges, businesses... We really need about 10x the number of chargers we currently have before we can realistically replace gas cars - and we need to cut charging time in half ( 30 minutes for a full charge)
 
Still don't have good options for people in my area, I need something at my apartment, not blocks away, nor do I have time to sit around waiting for vehicle to charge. I'll stick to public transit as the better option for greener transit.
 
Back