EV makers delay and cancel models as US tax credits vanish under Trump's new bill

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 739   +15
Staff
Bottom line: The electric vehicle industry is facing a period of turbulence as automakers across the globe adjust their strategies in response to shifting policies and a cooling market in the United States. While EV sales continue to climb worldwide, a wave of delays and cancellations is reshaping the future of many highly anticipated models.

A major turning point for the US market arrived with the recent passage of President Donald Trump's $3.4 trillion "Big, Beautiful" budget bill, which included the abrupt end of the federal EV tax credit. Set to expire at the end of September, the $7,500 credit has long been a cornerstone of EV affordability for American consumers. The new law, which also reversed stricter emissions standards, has left automakers scrambling to adapt their product plans and pricing strategies.

Dealers are now racing to move inventory before the incentive disappears, but many in the industry fear a sharp drop in demand once the credit is gone. The uncertainty has prompted several manufacturers to pause, delay, or even scrap new EV projects as they gauge the market's next move.

Nissan, once an EV pioneer, is scaling back its ambitions. Production of the next-generation Leaf, a key part of Nissan's recovery strategy, has been reduced due to rare earth mineral shortages and the looming end of US tax credits. Two new electric SUVs planned for the company's Mississippi plant have also been pushed back by nearly a year, with the Japanese firm citing slowing demand and policy headwinds in the US as key factors.

Ford, another major player, has canceled its planned three-row electric SUV, a project that had already been delayed before the latest policy changes. Instead, Ford is focusing on hybrid models and a new generation of electric pickups, shifting away from its earlier EV-heavy investment strategy. The company's decision is expected to cost up to $1.9 billion in write-downs and reflects a broader trend among automakers to prioritize hybrids and conventional vehicles in the near term.

Honda has also altered its course, halting development of a large electric SUV that was scheduled for a 2027 launch. This move follows an earlier decision to end a joint EV project with General Motors. While Honda still plans to introduce its Honda 0 models in the US next year, the company has scaled back its EV investment through the end of the decade.

Luxury brands are not immune to these shifts. Lamborghini, for example, has postponed the launch of its first fully electric vehicle to 2029, citing a lack of readiness in the high-performance market segment. The Italian automaker will instead focus on hybrid models for the foreseeable future, joining competitors in taking a more cautious approach to electrification. Ferrari, meanwhile, is preparing to debut its first all-electric car later this year, but the company has not committed to a timeline for a second EV amid concerns about demand for high-priced electric sports cars.

The landscape is equally challenging for newcomers and brands targeting budget-conscious buyers. Rivian, buoyed by fresh investment from Volkswagen, remains committed to launching its R2 SUV in 2026, though details about its more affordable R3 hatchback remain scarce. Slate Auto, which had promised a sub-$20,000 electric truck thanks to federal incentives, has been forced to raise its expected price into the mid-$20,000s after the loss of tax credits.

Volkswagen is seeing global success with its EV lineup, with sales rising by about 50 percent in the first half of 2025. However, the company is struggling to gain traction with its ID.Buzz electric van in the US, casting doubt on whether its more affordable models, such as the ID.EVERY1 and ID.2all, will make it to North American showrooms.

Tesla, the market leader, is also feeling the pinch. The company is on track to sell fewer EVs for the second consecutive year and has yet to announce a release date for its long-rumored affordable model, which is expected to be a less expensive version of the Model Y.

While US automakers grapple with policy changes and wavering consumer demand, China's EV market continues to expand rapidly. The country now accounts for nearly two-thirds of global EV sales, dwarfing the US share. Analysts estimate that China's battery-electric market is seven times larger than that of the United States, and the gap is expected to widen further in the coming years.

Despite the current wave of delays and cancellations, industry experts believe that electric vehicles are not going away. Many consumers who have switched to EVs are sticking with them, and the technology continues to improve. However, the pace of adoption in the US will likely slow as incentives fade and automakers take a more cautious approach to new model launches.

Permalink to story:

 
Credits vanish across entire economy, like farts in the wind, is all Trump's doing.

His actions remind of an old saying -
Kill a few people, they call you a murderer, kill millions - they call you a conqueror, go figure
As in, steal or damage economy in the region - you'll be jailed. But go f-k up economy of the entire country for many years to come, they will call you a reformer.

In the meantime, people in US are losing interest in EV-s, tired of the preached false good, shoved down their throats.
 
Last edited:
Goes to show the actual interest in EVs appears to be largely synthetic, dependent entirely on tax breaks to attract customers.
It was the same for hybrids. It's generally so that manufacturers can invest in new tech and production lines knowing that they'll be able to move a sustainable amount of cars until the technology matures and prices come down.

This just put the US back a decade compared to Europe and Asia in terms of adoption rate, production and infrastructure.
 
It won't disappear but I guarantee there will be a future movie with some environmental type driving an electric. That's where you will see most of them. I am hoping for gas to get so cheap they will build "muscle cars" again. No reason for taxpayers to support people buying EV's. I would rather my taxes went to protecting the country.
 
As someone in the oil and gas industry, this hate of EV's is fascinating to me? I have solar and an EV. America won't be the first to run out of petroleum, but we also won't be the last. Having a well developed alternative will save us a lot of pain down the road. This is very short sighted. America will be behind in the future. Thats not "strong."
 
It was the same for hybrids. It's generally so that manufacturers can invest in new tech and production lines knowing that they'll be able to move a sustainable amount of cars until the technology matures and prices come down.

This just put the US back a decade compared to Europe and Asia in terms of adoption rate, production and infrastructure.
I am not an big EV fan. But I am absolutely sure that American made EVs should be able to compete with those made in China. Yes, it means huge subsidies. But if we are left behind, China will be dictating prices. And those won't anywhere close to what they are now. They want to kill competition; it is their national goal.
Give those credits, encourage every EV built here, fully or partially. We cannot afford to stay behind.
 
As someone in the oil and gas industry, this hate of EV's is fascinating to me? I have solar and an EV. America won't be the first to run out of petroleum, but we also won't be the last. Having a well developed alternative will save us a lot of pain down the road. This is very short sighted. America will be behind in the future. Thats not "strong."
The most negative thing I have regarding EVs is governments taxing people to force them to switch. Governments deciding to ban gas cars. I hate that very much. I hate when the government comes after working class people "for the sake of environment" taxing those that already pay enough.
As for EVs merely as a tech, they are not ready if they need a giant credit for a buyer. Their range is not long enough unless you pay a very premium price, and the batteries do not last as long to convince people who hold their cars for more than 8 years to buy them. If they last longer, why are car makes so hesitant to give a warranty exceeding 8 years? Because they know very well where the technology is.
Let them be. But let's not let the government to dictate what to buy and how to drive.
 
Why oh why is everything related to Trump. Yes, he shut off the incentives for EV's, but let's face it, EV sales have been dropping long before the election. So, the end result is that instead of the average price being 60k, it will now be a few thousand more. Most consumers couldn't afford EV's in the first place, and the people that could and wanted one can still buy any one they want.

So what's going on, you may ask? EV's are mostly toys for the wealthy. The majority of EV's were a second or third car for most families, and the inflation and economy of the last 4 years has lead to market saturation. Add on that everyone making cars in the US was more or less forced by the EPA to get into the market, and you have more vehicles, more choices, and fewer buyers.
Until something dramatic changes in the price/performance equation, EV's have peaked. Ford, for example in the article, will spend 1.9 billion to reverse their 3+ billion all in bet that had them losing $40k on every EV sold.

In reference to a previous poster, I have never been "anti-EV", my wife has a hybrid and they are great for a segment o the population. But no amount of EPA rules, tax credits, and current technology are going to make them the "ultimate one size fits all" solution.

How about let the market decide? Everyone who want one should be able to get one, and where they don't fit, the rest shouldn't be forced to buy them either.
 
Why oh why is everything related to Trump. Yes, he shut off the incentives for EV's, but let's face it, EV sales have been dropping long before the election. So, the end result is that instead of the average price being 60k, it will now be a few thousand more. Most consumers couldn't afford EV's in the first place, and the people that could and wanted one can still buy any one they want.

So what's going on, you may ask? EV's are mostly toys for the wealthy. The majority of EV's were a second or third car for most families, and the inflation and economy of the last 4 years has lead to market saturation. Add on that everyone making cars in the US was more or less forced by the EPA to get into the market, and you have more vehicles, more choices, and fewer buyers.
Until something dramatic changes in the price/performance equation, EV's have peaked. Ford, for example in the article, will spend 1.9 billion to reverse their 3+ billion all in bet that had them losing $40k on every EV sold.

In reference to a previous poster, I have never been "anti-EV", my wife has a hybrid and they are great for a segment o the population. But no amount of EPA rules, tax credits, and current technology are going to make them the "ultimate one size fits all" solution.

How about let the market decide? Everyone who want one should be able to get one, and where they don't fit, the rest shouldn't be forced to buy them either.
Everything has to be about Trump because, aside from a political ideology that demands everything be political, the all electric future has some serious inconvenient truths to deal with that nobody wants to discuss. Whether it be the high purchase costs, the difficulty in replacing the batteries, the technical problems, the lack of charging infrastructure, ece, its clear that EVs are still experimental and the ramifications for the lower class are rather disturbing.

Far easier to scream about the Cheeto then admit the Green Dream is rather flawed from the outset.
The most negative thing I have regarding EVs is governments taxing people to force them to switch. Governments deciding to ban gas cars. I hate that very much. I hate when the government comes after working class people "for the sake of environment" taxing those that already pay enough.
As for EVs merely as a tech, they are not ready if they need a giant credit for a buyer. Their range is not long enough unless you pay a very premium price, and the batteries do not last as long to convince people who hold their cars for more than 8 years to buy them. If they last longer, why are car makes so hesitant to give a warranty exceeding 8 years? Because they know very well where the technology is.
Let them be. But let's not let the government to dictate what to buy and how to drive.
If EVs were so great, they wouldnt need the incentives to sell.
As someone in the oil and gas industry, this hate of EV's is fascinating to me? I have solar and an EV. America won't be the first to run out of petroleum, but we also won't be the last. Having a well developed alternative will save us a lot of pain down the road. This is very short sighted. America will be behind in the future. Thats not "strong."
Every time you see someone say "I just dont get the hate?" you know they merely want to sound "intellectual" while adding nothing of value
It was the same for hybrids. It's generally so that manufacturers can invest in new tech and production lines knowing that they'll be able to move a sustainable amount of cars until the technology matures and prices come down.

This just put the US back a decade compared to Europe and Asia in terms of adoption rate, production and infrastructure.
Yeah, but with hybrids the tech was successful and able to run on its own four wheels without constant government handholding.

EV's OTOH, have seen billions in investment for development and infrastructure and still are not ready. Unlike hybrids, the flaws and drawbacks of EVs stand in the way of their use and enthusiasts seem really unwilling to address those concerns (oh range anxiety doesnt exist you just have to learnt he technology ece ece).

Perhaps if the billions upon billions the government spent on chargers had resulted in an actual charging network akin to what is seen in, say, norway, you'd see far better adoption numbers.
 
As someone in the oil and gas industry, this hate of EV's is fascinating to me? I have solar and an EV. America won't be the first to run out of petroleum, but we also won't be the last. Having a well developed alternative will save us a lot of pain down the road. This is very short sighted. America will be behind in the future. Thats not "strong."
Sorry to say, but you guys voted for this, now enjoy the results. All the Trump voters believe oil reserves are ever lasting or at least won't run out during their lifetime, so why worry about it? Not only is this short sighted, it's downright *****ic.

The whole world is moving forward while America moves backwards. Yes, get rid of all the electric cars, all the solar panels, wind power, etc. They're all ugly, expensive, so who needs them? I absolutely love all of Trump's policies. Let's move everything back to the 1950's, apparently that was America's golden age according to the orange imbecile.
 
Want more EVs in the US? Open up to Chinese car companies, with their stylish twenty thousand buck EVs. No can do, say BOTH political parties.
 
Back