1. TechSpot is dedicated to computer enthusiasts and power users. Ask a question and give support. Join the community here.
    TechSpot is dedicated to computer enthusiasts and power users.
    Ask a question and give support.
    Join the community here, it only takes a minute.
    Dismiss Notice

Facebook denies UK allegations after Six4Three document dump

By Cal Jeffrey · 4 replies
Dec 5, 2018
Post New Reply
  1. Facebook has seen almost no end to public scrutiny since the Cambridge Analytica scandal. It comes as no surprise that revelations and criticisms leveled at the social media titan in recent weeks have spun the company into turmoil and had the denial machine working overtime.

    On Wednesday, a British parliamentary committee made public numerous damaging internal emails and documents showing that the company allowed “special access” to users’ data to partner companies like Lyft and Netflix while denying access to competitors such as Vine.

    “Facebook have clearly entered into whitelisting agreements with certain companies, which meant that after the platform changes in 2014/15 they maintained full access to friends’ data [sic],” stated Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee Chairman Damian Collins in his summary of the document dump known as the “Six4Three files.” He adds, “It is not clear that there was any user consent for this, nor how Facebook decided which companies should be whitelisted or not.”

    "The documents were selectively leaked to publish some, but not all, of the internal discussions at Facebook at the time of our platform changes. But the facts are clear: we’ve never sold people’s data."

    Facebook quickly responded to the Six4Three files with a rebuttal saying they were “cherry-picked” and taken out of “context.”

    “We changed our platform policies in 2014/15 to prevent apps from requesting permission to access friends’ private information,” said a Facebook spokesperson referring to the whitelisting allegation. “In some situations, when necessary, we allowed developers to access a list of the users’ friends. This was not friends’ private information but a list of your friends (name and profile pic).”

    Collins also points out emails that spelled out the collection of user call and text logs on Android devices. He claims Facebook went to great lengths to keep users from realizing such data was being collected from them.

    “Facebook knew that the changes to its policies on the Android mobile phone system, which enabled the Facebook app to collect a record of calls and texts sent by the user would be controversial. To mitigate any bad PR, Facebook planned to make it as hard of possible for users to know that this was one of the underlying features of the upgrade of their app.”

    Facebook flatly denied the allegation saying that users had to “opt-in” to share their call and message logs. The company pointed out that it only used this information to improve Facebook Lite and Messenger apps' abilities to make call suggestions and rank contact lists. It says that an audit conducted this year showed that such data is not as useful after it becomes old insinuating that it no longer collects such logs.

    “After a thorough review in 2018, it became clear that the information is not as useful after about a year,” the spokesperson said. “You are unlikely to need to call someone who you last called over a year ago compared to a contact you called just last week.”

    However, the company stopped short of explicitly saying that it no longer collects this information.

    There were four other areas that Collins expressed concerns over ranging from the valuation of friends’ data to increase FB revenues to using data collected from the Onavo VPN app. Facebook had “explanations” for them all and maintains that Six4Three only selected "some, but not all" documents and discussion in these matters.

    You can check out the full 250-page document dump including the DCMS’s summary at the UK parliament’s website. Facebook's response is posted in its Newsroom.

    Permalink to story.

  2. Squid Surprise

    Squid Surprise TS Evangelist Posts: 2,109   +1,140

    And this is why Facebook, if not the entire internet, should never be used to post anything you actually want to remain private on.

    Always assume anything you do online will eventually be available to EVERYONE and act accordingly.
    senketsu and Eldritch like this.
  3. Eldritch

    Eldritch TS Booster Posts: 48   +61

    Whoa, so the social network site sells my data to third parties. *Shocked*

    The call and message collection is a unresonable and dangerous breach of privacy and it has become so prevalent in Android apps that Google had changed its policy drastically and now only apps who are default phone and messaging apps can access it along with some cherry picked exceptions.
    Reehahs likes this.
  4. seeprime

    seeprime TS Guru Posts: 269   +257

    They're lying with the truth. Facebook did not sell peoples data. They gave it away to advertisers that spent at least $250,000 annually, according to Ars. It's a lot like Bill Clinton saying "it depends what the meaning of is is." Lie by telling part of the truth.
    senketsu and Reehahs like this.
  5. senketsu

    senketsu TS Guru Posts: 828   +554

    The ship is leaking Zuck ….. may it continue until the titanic is sunk!

Similar Topics

Add your comment to this article

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...