vnf4ultra
Posts: 1,360 +2
Soul Harvester said:Front Side Bus is very important and has a large impact in performance, a far greater impact than CPU speed does. It doesn't matter if your cpu is running at 10 billion GHZ, if you are using a slow FSB, your entire system is going to suffer from it.
Bus speed makes a huge difference for CPUs of the same type and speed. It is better to take a lower speed processor with a much higher FSB than a faster CPU with a slower FSB. You need to study up a bit more on how the CPU communicates ram and the motherboard.
I know bus speed affects system speed, but I'm saying, the cpu itself won't perform much differently(or is that wrong?). I know, and said "The difference would be the speeds that they support ram at, and also some models have Hyperthreading, so they perform somewhat better." , that you'll use faster ram(pc3200) with a 800fsb cpu, it'll make the system faster to have a faster fsb, but will the processor itself actually be faster(ie in cpu benches?).
Tom's cpu charts seem to support my statement.
http://www23.tomshardware.com/index.html? modelx=33&model1=28&model2=18&chart=4
all the 3ghz models(regardless of fsb) score similarly.
"It is better to take a lower speed processor with a much higher FSB than a faster CPU with a slower FSB"
Not always.
http://www23.tomshardware.com/index.html?modelx=33&model1=21&model2=28&chart=27
The p4 2.4ghz 800fsb is beaten by a few 533fsb models, it isn't all about fsb, it's the combination of fsb and cpu.
I'd rather have a 10billion ghz cpu and a 400fsb than a 3.8ghz 800fsb anyday, at least you'd have braggin' rights