FBI ends legal battle with Apple after breaking into iPhone 5c

What I read was they did not. They just found some [presumably hackers] who did it, thus all theories about prior ability are wild speculation. Apple has a marketing problem now. Some bought it as "unbreakable" and their early attitude was to lie and claim it couldn't be broken into. Then the rest of this pitch about "rights" instead when it became clear that is "hard" but not impossible. This is marketing damage control, don't elevate marketroids into heroes. Like everything else, somebody found a more "natural" back door that was already there, no need to ask for another one. I'm glad because it makes Apple out to be the hypocrites they actually are.

And they want the government to further reveal exactly what the mechanism is that was exploited? I say let them pay for it. After all, had they and the hackers gotten together to fix it, Apple would have paid. Why is this any different? The false premise of "perfect" code that was pitched is just a fairy tale. I hope more Android phones are sold to disillusioned former Apple buyers. If it isn't "perfect" for the purpose of hiding their naked selfies they took while drunk, they might as well spend less to do it all over again. Free enterprise is the winner here.
You say they have a marketing problem, but do they really? Apple never claimed their encryption was unbreakable, they just said they don't have the encryption keys.
Apple is probably going to have to pay the people who found the exploit to find the vulnerability and patch it. The reason it's different, is that now they don't have to pay someone to find a flaw in their encryption or create one for any other reason than improving security instead of undermining it.
I don't think this is going to make a huge dent in iPhone sales, but I guess I'll have to wait and find out.
 
Actually, they do have the problem. They claimed it was unbreakable. They lied and just said so. Some people bought into it, that's why they lied in the first place to maintain the mystique/myth. There is no other reason for the original deflection. You are attempting to parse some words you want to apply. Ask that portion of the customer base that got that "impression" if you are of a mind to defend them; I'm not. The rest wouldn't care either way. I think Apple knows exactly what and who their customer base is and how best to manipulate them for maximum profits. The rest that has been in the news is arguably a smokescreen so they can wrap themselves up in "privacy rights" to cover the fact that in fact, it is a mediocre product, pretty much everything is. It is routine to find back-doors and other flaws. They just wanted to set themselves apart from that on false premises.

Lets see what they say after they somehow deal with the flaw. I suspect they will eventually pay the same people that found this one [and probably a few more] and then wait for the announcement of perfection having yet again being achieved [until the next one after that, which is inevitable].
 
Actually, they do have the problem. They claimed it was unbreakable. They lied and just said so. Some people bought into it, that's why they lied in the first place to maintain the mystique/myth. There is no other reason for the original deflection. You are attempting to parse some words you want to apply. Ask that portion of the customer base that got that "impression" if you are of a mind to defend them; I'm not. The rest wouldn't care either way. I think Apple knows exactly what and who their customer base is and how best to manipulate them for maximum profits. The rest that has been in the news is arguably a smokescreen so they can wrap themselves up in "privacy rights" to cover the fact that in fact, it is a mediocre product, pretty much everything is. It is routine to find back-doors and other flaws. They just wanted to set themselves apart from that on false premises.

Lets see what they say after they somehow deal with the flaw. I suspect they will eventually pay the same people that found this one [and probably a few more] and then wait for the announcement of perfection having yet again being achieved [until the next one after that, which is inevitable].
Could you find a source of that happening for me? If they actually claimed their encryption was perfect then that would be hilarious.
 
Much ado about nothing but I'm glad they've cracked the device. The password was probably "Allah" anyway. That chump never struck me as someone being higher up the IQ tree, they never are. Their masters don't need them to think for themselves, just believe all their horse manure and obey their command.
WELL SAID SKID..........
 
Could you find a source of that happening for me? If they actually claimed their encryption was perfect then that would be hilarious.

Agreed. Marketroid manipulation to a foolish buying public doesn't take the form of convenient source references. Ask some of the fanbois who brag about what "security" their little toy had [in their heads from the above]. In any case, it was widely quoted that Cook said "it cannot be done". That is, until he changed his mind and then said it was a lot of work, and then said they don't want to for all those wrapped-in-the-American-flag reasons.
 
These people who say that Apple Inc. should face legal ramifications seem to forget that said corporation offered to decrypt the Iphone themselves. That way the code stays within Apple, and the FBI know that they can trust the source. This absolutely was a battle to create the legal precedent. If there were a legal precedent then next time there was a case like this (say with an Android phone) the FBI would have a lot easier of a time convincing the courts to find in their favor.
 
Back