Firefox increased its market share in Europe thanks to Digital Markets Act

[Puiu]

That was impressive...said no security expert. Only one of your suggestions has any application to real user security, and even then only barely. Good showing.

Since when did I say that I will give you security only? And I intentionally didn't cover specific security problems. I was obviously talking about "all aspects" and I pretty much touched a lot of the different parts of the browser.

But hey, you do you.

In case you didn't know, there have been many zero day security risks, bugs and other security issues some of which remained unfixed for MANY years. From data theft, browser history, and even camera/mic exploits. But all browsers have been full of holes, not just Safari.

 

[ZedRM]

Since when did I say that I will give you security only?

Oh?

I am a better security expert than you.

You said that and then followed up with only a weak arse response.

 

[Puiu]

Oh?

You said that and then followed up with only a weak arse response.

Should I prove myself to you? Why? I know my job, my skills and experience and and I'm confident in what I do.

Explaining in details is not my goal. Just to tell you my thought process and to use facts to support my opinion.

You focusing on just security even though I never did that shows that you have a very specific goal in mind: to make excuses for what Apple is doing using bad faith arguments.

You are not denying the 7 points I've given, you are just focusing a specific one because you could not accept that I said that I'm better at security than you.

Did you ever work with a cybersecurity company for a security audit and implemented their audit results? Yes or no.

 

[Burty117]

You said that and then followed up with only a weak arse response.

Not standing up for anyone here, but the original comments were advocating for not opening iOS up to allow for different browser engines and forcing only WebKit like it currently stands.

If you see the flaws in that logic, you're already better at understanding security than the original poster.

 

[pnntmp]

I am a better security expert than you.

Aspects:
1. Website compatibility (or general implementation of html/js/etc specs - it's a serious issue)
2. New technology compatibility/implementation
3. Bugs, stability and performance (until recently animating "position:fixed" objects used to cause major FPS drops - for years I had to make workarounds for it, and JS performance is a joke)
4. UI/UX issues
5. Customization
6. Update cadance
7. Development tools are a joke compared to any other browser

Imagine being in 2025 and Safari on iOS still not fixing a major rendering bugs for half a decade like with background-attachment:fixed not working at all and aspect-ratio not respecting the set value.

All browsers have issues in these areas, Safari is in no way notable in that regard. None of that is related to security.

Apparently your security expert certificate is self-signed

 

[Puiu]

All browsers have issues in these areas, Safari is in no way notable in that regard. None of that is related to security.

Apparently your security expert certificate is self-signed

True, none of that is related to security per se. But it doesn't mean that we should accept Apple's excuses. It's all about money and having complete control.

My self-signed certificate has fooled enough people to give me their money for my services. Does this make me a zero day bug?

 

[ZedRM]

Should I prove myself to you?

To me personally? No. You made the claim and then didn't explain further. That's all I'm pointing out.

 

[Puiu]

To me personally? No. You made the claim and then didn't explain further. That's all I'm pointing out.

I did explain, more than enough. Are you here to tell me that "security" is not an excuse for Apple and the Safari browser is not falling behind the rest of the browsers in all aspects?

Explain to me how I am wrong. Take the list I've given and show me how any of those are wrong.