Firefox's upcoming "cookie-less" tracking comes under fire by Austrian privacy watchdog

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 1,712   +502
Staff
Facepalm: Mozilla recently introduced a controversial technology designed to help advertisers while preserving users' privacy. However, a European privacy watchdog says that while it's "less invasive" than tracking cookies, it is still tracking without consent. It has asked regulators to open a GDRP investigation.

Mozilla introduced the Privacy-Preserving Attribution API with Firefox 128, stating that it would measure ad "performance" without employing third-party servers to track what Firefox users were doing online. The European Center for Digital Rights, also known as Noyb (none of your business), has now filed a complaint against the US company, lamenting that the new API is just switching control of the tracking process to the browser instead of eliminating it.

Nyob claims that Firefox is tracking users now instead of individual websites. Privacy-conscious users could consider this an improvement over traditional behavioral profiling with invasive cookies. However, Mozilla doesn't ask users for permission and enables the feature by default. The opt-out feature is similar to Google's Privacy Sandbox initiative, which promised to kill third-party cookies using browser-based tracking but failed.

While PPA is considered a less invasive tracking alternative in the US, Nyob stated, it still violates Europe's General Data Protection Regulation.

"Mozilla has just bought into the narrative that the advertising industry has a right to track users by turning Firefox into an ad measurement tool," said Nyob data protection lawyer Felix Mikolasch.

Users have not been informed or asked for consent about the new tracking API, and Mozilla doesn't even mention the feature in its policies. Users should always have the right to choose, and Firefox should turn off PPA tracking by default.

"It's a shame that an organization like Mozilla believes that users are too dumb to say yes or no," Mikolasch said.

Nyob is now asking the Austrian data protection authority (DSB) to investigate Mozilla and request that the company delete all "unlawfully" processed data. Mozilla recently explained that Privacy-Preserving Attribution was an attempt to usher in a "new era" for privacy and digital advertising – a prototype it would have proposed become a new standard approved by the World Wide Web Consortium.

As the DSB considers Nyob's complaint, Mozilla is in the earliest phase of PPA implementation. The organization confirmed that Firefox 128 included the feature's initial code. However, it remains unactivated and hasn't begun collecting, recording, or sending end-user data. Mozilla has already started limited testing of the PPA API on its Developer Network website, and the company still thinks this is the right approach to improve advertising and privacy online.

Permalink to story:

 
If you're a Firefox user who cares about privacy. LibreWolf makes it easy, it's a privacy focused Firefox. PPA API is disabled by default.

If you prefer to stick with official Firefox for whatever reason, you can disable it manually. Open "about:config" and toggle: dom.private-attribution.submission.enabled

If it doesn't exist, create the entry and set it to false.

That's the beauty of Firefox. Even when Mozilla oversteps, you're still in control.
 
I had to double take that. I thought it was Australian, and I'm like no way, they love watching their citizens. I was correct...
 
If you're a Firefox user who cares about privacy. LibreWolf makes it easy, it's a privacy focused Firefox. PPA API is disabled by default.
This is a good alternative.
If you prefer to stick with official Firefox for whatever reason, you can disable it manually. Open "about:config" and toggle: dom.private-attribution.submission.enabled

If it doesn't exist, create the entry and set it to false.
This is the better option. Thank You.
That's the beauty of Firefox. Even when Mozilla oversteps, you're still in control.
True
 
Last edited:
The Mozilla tech lead said users HATE interruptions with such popups and he is right. And you can disable it anytime you want. Even NOYB admits this is better than traditional cookie-based tracking. So all of this is nothing more than a publicity stunt, really.
 
If you're a Firefox user who cares about privacy. LibreWolf makes it easy, it's a privacy focused Firefox. PPA API is disabled by default.

If you prefer to stick with official Firefox for whatever reason, you can disable it manually. Open "about:config" and toggle: dom.private-attribution.submission.enabled

If it doesn't exist, create the entry and set it to false.

That's the beauty of Firefox. Even when Mozilla oversteps, you're still in control.
That's great and all, until 6 updates from now where that option is removed and you now are mandated to use the new system.

Firefox devs dont care about the users. The last 15 years have made that BLATANTLY clear. They have, consistently, made unpopular changes, claiming that users "didnt know what they wanted", doing things despite feedback, and ignoring or banning users from their forums who object to changes.

But people will defend this turd because "well well well its not chrome" as if that justifies the fecal matter staining your carpet. At least its not vomit?
 
This is a good initiative by Mozilla, and perhaps the only initiative, because no other browser maker is going to do it like this, assuming they want to do it.

Ad companies can continue getting blanket banned by adblockers, or, start using this and get at least some user data rather than almost none. It will be wonderful when the next iteration will start helping users to monetise their own data. That's still a pipe dream, but Mozilla helped bring us one step closer to it.
 
Just checked and the entry was set to false by default in FF 130.01

I'm running 130.01 and just checked - in mine, it was set to 'true'. This is disheartening; are they just randomly assigning the default to true, in order to...well, I've no idea why they'd randomize the default.
I switched it to 'false', but Jesus H. Christ in a chicken basket, what are you doing, Mozilla???
 
I'm running 130.01 and just checked - in mine, it was set to 'true'. This is disheartening; are they just randomly assigning the default to true, in order to...well, I've no idea why they'd randomize the default.
I switched it to 'false', but Jesus H. Christ in a chicken basket, what are you doing, Mozilla???

Damn, must be regional. I'm in Australia and hadn't even heard about this until this story, so never changed it.
 
And they still get it mostly right. Ease up, eh? The fix is simple and is disabled in the latest versions.
"Mostly right" is not good enough for a browser for which the only selling point is that it's not a spyware like Chrome and its many iterations.
 
Last edited:
So can we. Except some people out there don't care about what's legal. Companies should at all times keep in mind that some portions of the public will do them dirty..

True.

Yeah, because that always works.

That means they can do what they want as long as it's legal, right?
 
Not always. I care more about what is genuinely honest and fair.
Everyone cares for what they think is "honest" and "fair" for themselves. They don't actually care for what's truly honest and fair, because that could mean them getting the short end of the stick.
 
Everyone cares for what they think is "honest" and "fair" for themselves. They don't actually care for what's truly honest and fair, because that could mean them getting the short end of the stick.
Was that an attempt at clever retort? It really wasn't.
 
Back