But what about yellow? When will #AsianLivesMatter? What about rest of the world, of which many were also slaves at some point in history? When will their lives matter?
White moves first, FYI.Anyone got some stats on whether Chess Grandmasters prefer black to white pieces? I forget who moves first in chess, the only thing I really know about is that I lose.
Hmm, you forgot Native Americans.At least checkers is sensible, black vs. red. No white at all.
What! Did you really say "blacked out parts" That's it banned from comments for life! ?History books are going to start looking like confidential files with blacked out parts. ?
3. Blackout : Evil white men have made it a point to keep people of color away from power and this is symbolized in the term blackout which insinuates Lack of power. Patriarchy at its most devious!
It will take you approximately 39 seconds to read this email.Trump was never elected
The majority refused to vote for Trump or Hillary
But they're not listening!
Of those who did vote, the majority voted for Hillary
But they're not listening!
The next election will be the same
So, now who's listening?
ELECTORAL COLLEGE !!!The Majority in this country does not elect the President. The Founders KNEW what they were about. Start listening!
It will take you approximately 39 seconds to read this email.
Last month the newly convened, Democratic-controlled House of Representatives introduced a bill to eliminate the electoral college. (https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-joint-resolution/7)
It seems that, since they couldn't win the last presidential election under the rules that have existed for almost 250 years, they want to
change the rules. Below is an excellent explanation of why this is a very bad idea
In their infinite wisdom, the United States' Founders created the Electoral College to ensure the States were fairly represented. Why
should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation?
The following list of statistics has been making the rounds on the Internet It should finally put an end to the argument as to why the
Electoral College makes sense. Do share this. It needs to be widely known and understood.
There are 3,141 counties in the United States… Trump won 3,084 of them. Clinton won 57.
There are 62 counties in New York State… Trump won 46 of them. Clinton won 16.
Clinton won the popular vote by approximately 1.5 million votes.
In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (the Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; Trump won Richmond). Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the entire country.
These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles. The United States is comprised of 3,797,000 square miles.
When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national election.
Large, densely populated Democrat cities (NYC, Chicago, Los Angeles, etc.) DO NOT and SHOULD NOT speak for the rest of our country!
Well worth the 39 seconds to read? Now please pass it on!
WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, I AM NOT SAYING IT, THAT’S JUST HOW IT WORKS:You are of course free to express your bias whenever you like but your opinion is just a biased as the next and just as viable or non-viable.
It seems you're saying that a minority population should be able to elect the president. You're saying that some votes should count more than other votes. If more people choose to live in a city than in a more rural area, then for some random reason their votes should count less?
That seems to be your bias. I don't agree with it. Try this, just as an example:
Small, underpopulated Republican rural areas (Wyoming, South Dakota, Alaska, etc.) DO NOT and SHOULD NOT speak for the rest of our country!
WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, I AM NOT SAYING IT, THAT’S JUST HOW IT WORKS:
When Americans vote for President and Vice President of the United States, they are actually voting for presidential electors, known collectively as the Electoral College. It is these electors, chosen by the people, who elect the chief executive. The Constitution assigns each state a number of electors equal to the combined total of the state’s Senate and House of Representatives delegations; at present, the number of electors per state ranges from three (District of Columbia) to 55 (California), for a total of 538. To be elected President of the United States, a candidate needs a majority of 270 electoral votes.
When Americans vote for President and Vice President of the United States, they are actually voting for presidential electors, known collectively as the Electoral College. It is these electors, chosen by the people, who elect the chief executive. The Constitution assigns each state a number of electors equal to the combined total of the state’s Senate and House of Representatives delegations; at present, the number of electors per state ranges from three (District of Columbia) to 55 (California), for a total of 538. To be elected President of the United States, a candidate needs a majority of 270 electoral votes. SUGGEST YOU READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE:
https://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/electoral-college
It will take you approximately 39 seconds to read this email.
Last month the newly convened, Democratic-controlled House of Representatives introduced a bill to eliminate the electoral college. (https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-joint-resolution/7)
It seems that, since they couldn't win the last presidential election under the rules that have existed for almost 250 years, they want to
change the rules. Below is an excellent explanation of why this is a very bad idea
In their infinite wisdom, the United States' Founders created the Electoral College to ensure the States were fairly represented. Why
should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation?
The following list of statistics has been making the rounds on the Internet It should finally put an end to the argument as to why the
Electoral College makes sense. Do share this. It needs to be widely known and understood.
There are 3,141 counties in the United States… Trump won 3,084 of them. Clinton won 57.
There are 62 counties in New York State… Trump won 46 of them. Clinton won 16.
Clinton won the popular vote by approximately 1.5 million votes.
In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (the Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; Trump won Richmond). Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the entire country.
These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles. The United States is comprised of 3,797,000 square miles.
When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national election.
Large, densely populated Democrat cities (NYC, Chicago, Los Angeles, etc.) DO NOT and SHOULD NOT speak for the rest of our country!
Well worth the 39 seconds to read? Now please pass it on!
No you don't apologise. For the next generation stuff, you address the problem and move on. That is exactly what this announcement is about. It's NOT about YOU. Master/slave origins are clear as day. It's recognising the REAL VICTIMS and deciding casual racism, classist language is just poor form and has no place in society for people empathetic to the real victims of racism.I get where they're coming from, a politically correct appease everyone stance, but that doesn't mean I agree at all.
I always considered IT to be a politics free zone. Should I be apologizing to my old secondary IDE hard drive for setting its jumper to slave? No. That's pure nonsense.
No you don't apologise. For the next generation stuff, you address the problem and move on. That is exactly what this announcement is about. It's NOT about YOU. Master/slave origins are clear as day. It's recognising the REAL VICTIMS and deciding casual racism, classist language is just poor form and has no place in society for people empathetic to the real victims of racism.
Everyone here complaining about this is butthurt like they are the real victims in all of this. US society (and many other countries) had slavery in the conventional definition. US still to this day has enormous wealth disparity from black to whites from entrenched wealth and power of the wealthy class in many many cases without merit.
Honestly ask yourself what the best way of getting high paid jobs are across the board? NETWORK. Look at the demographics of who are running the boards, in the senior positions. NETWORKS are NOT MERIT BASED.
Here is another example of how bias trumps merit traditionally.
https://www.theguardian.com/women-in-leadership/2013/oct/14/blind-auditions-orchestras-gender-bias
People are way too sensitive about everything. Everyone's a snowflake these days. For god's sake, who gives if it's called blacklist or whitelist? You know how much that matters? NONE.
You know how much world hunger and other big issues matter? A lot. We're wasting our time and resources on things that don't matter.